new for 2014 S&W M&P Bodyguard 380

[rbuzz]

It looks like Smith & Wesson has reworked the Bodyguard 380 and has given it the M&P treatment. With a new slide with the M&P logo, adjustable sights, and now without the built in laser, it is now officially a part of the M&P family.

Product: Model M&P BODYGUARD® 380

 

[GKC]

I owned one, and sold it. I liked it much better than the LCP or TCP....but I didn't trust it.

Did they eliminate the laser? I don't see the buttons. I couldn't tell from the video. If so, I'd sure consider one!

 

[shawn mccarver]

My only issues with the original Bodyguard .380 were the laser, which would not hold zero and the odd appearance with the pelican looking cust cover. This is a vast improvement in appearance. Unfortunately, with the pocket 9mm pistols now, such as the Shield, G26, SIG 290RS, Beretta Nano, etc., I am not sure exactly what need there is for a .380. For those who wish a .380, I cannot see anything wrong with the new M&P Bodyguard .380.

 

[RussC]

Did they rework the trigger? I dry fired the older version today and the trigger feels like 12 lbs.

Russ

 

[RedWings05]

Exactly.... whats the trigger pull. Glock 42 might be irrelavant before it even comes out

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk

 

[NCooper]

Damn, now my wife wants to up grade hers.

 

[AR-Getsome]

I just ordered one. Just cause. Add to my M&P collection. I'm glad the laser is gone.

 

[BrianE]

That thing is still ugly..

 

[Nakanokalronin]

Here's a better close up: Just Announced: New Smith & Wesson M&P Bodyguard 380 Pistol

Notice frame pins are solid now and second strike capability.

 

[jimmib]

I just bought the old one in Dec....the story of my life but I like the one I have so far after 100 rounds...just bought 3 more mags for it...kinda like buying a new cell phone...the day you buy it a new one that is faster and cooler is coming out

 

[Captain Skippy]

I agree that with the size of the small 9mm pistols why spend so much time developing a .380? I think Glock is crazy bring out one when we all want a single stack 9. Why not just bring out the 9 with a .380 barrel?

 

[b_san]

I agree that with the size of the small 9mm pistols why spend so much time developing a .380? I think Glock is crazy bring out one when we all want a single stack 9. Why not just bring out the 9 with a .380 barrel?

Because despite all the caliber snobs on various gun forums, 380's are big sellers.

 

[NOLASHOOTER]

I want one. I was on the fence about one before but now with the laser gone and the placement in the M&P line I am sold.

 

[Ransom]

Notice frame pins are solid now and second strike capability.

The original BG380 has second strike capability as well.

My only issues with the original Bodyguard .380 were the laser, which would not hold zero and the odd appearance with the pelican looking cust cover. This is a vast improvement in appearance. Unfortunately, with the pocket 9mm pistols now, such as the Shield, G26, SIG 290RS, Beretta Nano, etc., I am not sure exactly what need there is for a .380. For those who wish a .380, I cannot see anything wrong with the new M&P Bodyguard .380.

Yep, for those who want the small package and light weight with less recoil, the .380 is a good compromise. A 9mm in the same package would be too painful and hard to shoot well for many people. The BG380 is small enough to be a true pocket pistol, unlike the Shield, etc. Yes, some people pocket carry a Shield, but those are exceptions.

I've got a Shield and a BG380 and like having both. I would have gotten the M&P BG380 if that were an option at the time.

 

[Vinney47]

Aside from adding "M&P" to the slide, and missing the laser... is there any difference between old and new BG 380's?

 

[Ransom]

Aside from adding "M&P" to the slide, and missing the laser... is there any difference between old and new BG 380's?

Drift adjustable front sight (rear sight already was) and two magazines instead of one.

 

[SpringGunTunes]

As much as I like S&W, I think the Beretta Pico would be a better choice for a pocket .380. 0.725 width on the Pico. I can't find the width on the Bodyguard.
Rob

 

[GKC]

As much as I like S&W, I think the Beretta Pico would be a better choice for a pocket .380. 0.725 width on the Pico. I can't find the width on the Bodyguard.
Rob

I haven't dealt with Beretta in a couple of years, but my last experience with their customer service wasn't positive...and unless it's changed, they don't have a lifetime warranty.

I much prefer to buy new guns from companies like S&W, Ruger, and Springfield, who have great CS, lifetime warranties, and they pay for shipping.

That being said, sometimes another manufacturer has a gun that works best for you...and then you just have to take your chances that you won't need CS. Many people never do...but if there is anything that can go wrong with something I buy, it usually does.

 

[Ransom]

As much as I like S&W, I think the Beretta Pico would be a better choice for a pocket .380. 0.725 width on the Pico. I can't find the width on the Bodyguard.
Rob

Interesting. I have not heard of the Pico before. Looks like a nice little gun. The BG380 is .75" wide.

 

[ammodave]

I like my Kahr CW380, much better trigger than the LCP and it's about .25" shorter than the LCP or BG380.