Pythons
I think the pythons and diamond backs are classic designs and are great looking revolvers & testament to Colt's ability to produce beautiful revolvers, having said that.....I have been a "revolver mechanic" since the early 70's and was an agency armorer for decades.....there are reasons why you did not see Colt revolvers dominating the law enforcement market, PPC matches, the bullseye matches, pin shoots, IPSC , ISHMA revolver, etc....the fellow who was my mentor as a armorer had been in the trade since the 40's and worked on thousands of Colt's and Smith's. He always made jokes abt the Colt's and their innards....they were the "big hammer" guns in his vernacular.
I've owned them, shot them and fixed them....but the vast majority of my revolvers are Smith & Wessons and most of my 1911's are Colt's. As far as spending a couple of thousand of dollars for a python....they can have them as far as I am concerned & leave the Smith's for me.
I think the pythons and diamond backs are classic designs and are great looking revolvers & testament to Colt's ability to produce beautiful revolvers, having said that.....I have been a "revolver mechanic" since the early 70's and was an agency armorer for decades.....there are reasons why you did not see Colt revolvers dominating the law enforcement market, PPC matches, the bullseye matches, pin shoots, IPSC , ISHMA revolver, etc....the fellow who was my mentor as a armorer had been in the trade since the 40's and worked on thousands of Colt's and Smith's. He always made jokes abt the Colt's and their innards....they were the "big hammer" guns in his vernacular.
I've owned them, shot them and fixed them....but the vast majority of my revolvers are Smith & Wessons and most of my 1911's are Colt's. As far as spending a couple of thousand of dollars for a python....they can have them as far as I am concerned & leave the Smith's for me.
Last edited: