"davegarage" - May I ask where you came up with this information? because I'd really like to read it > "All of the bullet fragments recovered from every source point to the one weapon." If you believe in the "magic bullet" theory (one shooter, three shots - two hits, one miss), the bullet that was found or planted on Connally's gurney in the emergency room is the only bullet ever recovered from the crime and could have been fired previously before the crime took place. The bullet that was a miss according to the Warren Commission, hit the curb (which was cut out and replaced by the government afterwards) near the underpass, disintegrated and fragments of it slightly injured a bystander = not recovered. The last shot that hit Kennedy in the head - if it came from behind, it would have hit somewhere or someone in the car forward of the president and been found OR, if from the front, its still buried somewhere in the grass field opposite the knoll = never recovered. Please point me to the evidence because I love the discussion but the discussion should remain factual.
According to Wikipedia and many other sources, here's what the "magic bullet" did > "...a three-centimeter (1.2″)-long copper-jacketed lead-core 6.5-millimeter rifle bullet fired from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository passed through President Kennedy's neck and Governor Connally's chest and wrist and embedded itself in the Governor's thigh. If so, this bullet traversed 15 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, and approximately 15 inches of tissue, struck a necktie knot, removed 4 inches of rib, and shattered a radius bone..." All of this was concocted by Arlen Specter who was a Warren Commission staffer at the time and the Commission concluded that Kennedy and Connally were both hit by this same bullet. That was the only way they could make their preconceived theory of one shooter (Oswald) work. I can't for the life of me understand how anyone can believe the bullet I posted above did all that and then looks like it does afterwards.
One thing is for certain, ask a million people and you will get a million different opinions. What I always found difficult to believe is that so many people that weren't there when it happened discount the observations of those that were there - credible witnesses that were told afterwards they made it all up in their heads. How can people not question or discount why the president's body was illegally removed from Texas before the autopsy? Why are the statements made by the physician's in the hospital emergency room discounted as wrong? Why do the x-rays taken in Dallas differ from those released from the "official" D.C. autopsy? Why was this autopsy, probably the most important of all time, performed by people that had no forensic experience? Where did the president's brain disappear to and who made it disappear (it disappeared because it would show the truth)? Who faked the infamous picture of Oswald holding the "proven" murder weapon (how convenient)? Why did Warren refuse to take Ruby to a "safer zone" for the true story when Ruby asked when Warren supposedly wanted to find the truth? Why did the physicians in Dallas describe Kennedy's neck wound as a frontal wound and the doctors in D.C. describe it as an exit wound? Who / why..................................?
I apologize for adding onto all this as it is probably now boring most. I'll stop now!