Stratajema
Member
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2013
- Messages
- 239
- Reaction score
- 87
Just because you all have a Shield that works, why is it necessary to discount the opinion of the Shield owners who have identified problems?
The terrible truth is that S&W does not do a final quality control review of the Shield after it is assembled. (Unlike the Ulm proof house used in Germany by H&K and Walther.) The Shield gets shot once, maybe more and that's it. That is why a Shield shows up in the customer's hands with an out-of-spec recoil spring, a poorly drilled hole for the striker safety block that causes the gritty trigger feeling (and in turn causes people to buy the Apex trigger kit which by the way doesn't fix this underlying problem), tooling marks on the barrel from the use of dull cutting tools, a trigger safety that does not return freely, an overcut feed ramp entering the barrel on the 40 S&W models (have a happy kaboom), etc.
The Shield is a budget gun. I own one.
But I will never be in denial about its quality or lack of quality.
The terrible truth is that S&W does not do a final quality control review of the Shield after it is assembled. (Unlike the Ulm proof house used in Germany by H&K and Walther.) The Shield gets shot once, maybe more and that's it. That is why a Shield shows up in the customer's hands with an out-of-spec recoil spring, a poorly drilled hole for the striker safety block that causes the gritty trigger feeling (and in turn causes people to buy the Apex trigger kit which by the way doesn't fix this underlying problem), tooling marks on the barrel from the use of dull cutting tools, a trigger safety that does not return freely, an overcut feed ramp entering the barrel on the 40 S&W models (have a happy kaboom), etc.
The Shield is a budget gun. I own one.
