Former Glock carriers?

[Trons]

I wouldn't rely solely on any internet info for your decision.

I don't know if I would rely on the internet for a decision, but I will say that it greatly affected mine. When I got my CCDW, i started looking for a EDC. I wanted 9mm for various reasons, and I wanted single stack (effectively taking glock out of the picture, but I did look strongly at the G26). I ended up with the shield specifically because of what I had read on the internet. I could not find a better gun for even close to the price.

I do tend to take people talking bad about something with a grain of salt. People talking good about something is completely different, in my opinion.

I did hold the Shield first (but couldn't shoot it). I also held several other guns. Most felt pretty similar (unless you get to the 1911 grip angle which I don't like) and the trigger on the Shield pretty much beat the rest out.

I love my Shield and my friend who owns several Glocks is almost converted as well.

Long story short, I do a lot of research before a major purchase, most of it on the internet.

 

[Alpha Sierra]

I kicked both (Glock and S&W) to the curb. A CZ P-07 took their place.

 

[BIGMAC116]

I kicked both (Glock and S&W) to the curb. A CZ P-07 took their place.

Some folks drive Fiats....

 

[kudzu3]

Please explain this. If you're of the opinion that these guns are so worthless, why are you here? If you're not a fan of these firearms, fine. I'm not going to try to talk you into it. Please enjoy the rest of the forum and leave us to discuss the guns we enjoy in peace.

Off subject, sorry, but this is an unreasonably harsh response to a reasonable comment.

 

[Rastoff]

Off subject, sorry, but this is an unreasonably harsh response to a reasonable comment.

Unreasonably harsh? Hmmm, I thought it polite and to the point.

 

[Kanewpadle]

Off subject, sorry, but this is an unreasonably harsh response to a reasonable comment.

Hell I thought it was a good statement.

I mean really. Why make an unsubstantiated statement like that specifically on the M&P sub forum?

Certainly people are free to do as they choose. But when one makes a stupid statement it affects us all because we have to read it!

 

[GKC]

Unreasonably harsh? Hmmm, I thought it polite and to the point.

Hell I thought it was a good statement.

I agree.

I don't understand why people join a forum that focuses on guns they don't own...well, I can understand "lurking" to learn more about a potential purchase, and joining to be able to ask questions...but what I don't understand is to comment that no purchase is now or ever planned based on the comments made in the forum. If the "new member" arrives at that conclusion, then he or she should just log out and go away.

UNLESS one wants to troll and provoke a reaction...

 

[JeffShrugged]

I have a G19 I will be keeping forever. It's just a great pistol. I'm going to start IDPA and plan to use the G19 as my competition pistol. I also have a Shield 9 for carry, but I just bought a Springfield Armory EMP 9mm. It's a beautiful pistol, amazingly accurate, and I plan to give it some carry time. I'd like to get a G23 one of these days too. I need to get it before it falls off the roster as well. The goal of course is to eventually make all guns unavailable in California. They are very patient.

 

[bilkay]

I own and carry a G26, G19, PPQ M2, XDs, M&P 45c, and a PPS. When it came to single stack 9mm pistols, I shot the PPS better than the Shield, or I would have a Shield instead (still might get one, now that it is available without a safety). Of the group, the PPS and the G26 are easiest to carry, although the "compacts" listed above are also very easy to carry. I'll probably trade or sell the XDs, because it's not the same after the recall "repair". If I trade it, it'll probably be for a Shield or M&P 9c. Or an S&W revolver.

 

[Rastoff]

I'm going to start IDPA and plan to use the G19 as my competition pistol. I also have a Shield 9 for carry,...

The next time you're at the range, take both guns. Practice with the G19 for a while and then try to shoot a controlled pair, from concealment, quickly, with the Shield. I think you'll find it a little difficult to place those two shots accurately.

IDPA was started so guys could practice their self-defense skills. Using guns with different grip angles could compromise your ability when it counts most; protection from evil.

Some people are not affected by it, but most are. Since you will shoot your IDPA gun a lot more than your carry gun, it's a good idea to at least have two similar guns.

 

[MCM]

"Shield 9mm and a S&W J Frame (model 38) are what I carry"
Me too. Plus a G-22 .40. (I am limited to three guns on my CCW) But did pick up a G30s .45 and a G42 380.
Will shoot them for a while and see if they displace anything.
For me part of the fun is trying new guns. The slim 30s 10 shot .45 just appeals to me. And being 6' 3" 220 the G-42 is probably as small as I want to go. The slim design of the G-42 seems pretty slick to me. Do own more S&W products than any other. But am not blind to other great guns like my German Sigs and Glock's.

I have 2 Gen 3 Glock 19s that I will never get rid of, but a Shield 9mm and a S&W J Frame (model 38) are what I carry.
Could never warm up to the G26. Didn't like the 2 finger grip and was always getting pinched with the mag extension. Can get 3 fingers on the Shield (small hands). Put a Pachmayr slip on grip to give a little ore thickness and grip.

 

[g17]

Have carried glocks since 1988 without a hiccup so never felt the need to change. Have owned one M&P 9mm FS that came in a package deal and although I didn't have any problems with it, I just never could gain any confidence in it so it was sold.

 

[Fatdaddy]

I'm still consider myself a Glock fan but the ergos of the M&P are the best out there period. The biggest gripe I have about Glocks are the trigger. That little safety trigger just irritates my finger when shooting for any length of time.
Smith and Wesson really did there homework on the M&P series including the Shield, even the trigger is ergonomic.
I'd say they are equal as far as reliability.
The Shield has almost fully replaced my trusty G27.
9 times out of 10 the Shield is in my waisteband.

 

[Stu Honea]

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Gaston Glock made the world take notice. He built a better mouse trap. Don't get me wrong as I am a S&W fanboy, but they are a stable platform that functions admirably. I am happy that S&W saw this and jumped in with their take on it. If I'm picking between two loaded corvettes, I'm choosing the one that looks better; the M&P.

Agree on the nice looks of the M&P but not a good basis for choosing a fighting pistol,but I kind of have the same sentiments. My conversion actually started with the introduction of the Shield. I simply saw it as a modern pistol made with proven modern materials and technology that,with a few minor tweaks could actually become what the ASP aspired to be in it's day,but at a price point and availability that just about everyone could afford.
With Glock dragging it's feet on recent production issues that everyone knew existed and that they adamantly refused to address for a long time,while Smith&Wesson continued to strive to make the M&P's better, that didn't give much wiggle room when making a decision.
A recent production M&P 9FS and a 45 midsize have joined the party. Long on Glocks and short on M&P's but that's changing.The M&P 9 is my favorite pistol since the Mod.39-2.
I plan to continue to support this American company.No chinese potato chips in my house either!

 

[MCM]

Funny you mention it, the Glock 42 I just ordered is made in the USA. Paid $419.00

 

[gunny4053]

Although I carry a Shield 9mm, I'm still a Glock carrier. I've had many over the years, and though they never seem to fit my hand exactly right, I continue to come back to them because they work. I recently grabbed a Glock 30SF. The SF is quite simply the first Glock I've owned that actually fits my hand well. Because of the ability to run several different calibers from the same platform, as well as both 10 and 13 round mags, it's my workhorse gun. Grip angle and plastic sights aside, it's like anything, with enough practice you can overcome those issues. You just have to be willing to do so.

As for the M&P's, I have the Shield, but something about the larger models has yet to endear them to me. Maybe one day.

 

[PurpleMountainOutdoors]

So the question is, do I go M&P 40c to compliment my shield, or a G27 to compliment my 19?

 

[MCM]

The 27 is a 40.

Maybe a 26 & share mags?

Tough call if your like me and have to pick 3 for the permit.

 

[kalei]

I'm a Glock guy, although I had to sell mine off to acquire several other guns. Now if I can sell my S&W 24-3, I will be getting a couple more Glocks.

 

[fdw]

Ok, not a Glock owner but seriously have wanted to be for the last few years and have tried and tried to like them. I even almost purchased the 10mm the other day because I got a bonus and tried again to like it. But here's my problem, every time and I mean every single time I pick up a glock I feel like I'm reaching for the trigger.

I guess maybe my M&Ps have just spoiled me... I just can't get comfortable holding a glock and if it had even been somewhat close I would have purchased the 10mm is a skinny minute. Not even at the good price I was offered could I get around that "reaching" feeling.

My gun range clerks are big Glock people but I bet if they would really admit it, they like the feel of the M&P BETTER. And...last time I went to an outdoor range there was a big glock guy with us and I let him shoot my 9. He'd never shot one and worked in a gun store and could certainly tell you about all the horrible trigger stories associated with the M&P. Well after he shot mine, I could just see it in his expression how much he liked it, but man oh man he would never admit that.