I would go with the GI M1 carbine.
I think the logistics of a AR gun BAN is impossible.
However, making a magazine that holds more than
10 rounds illegal is much simpler.
Quick law making procession of a 10+ mag a felony.
Dumpsters placed at all City and County Police Departments
and Sheriffs stations and sub-stations nationwide.
Order given....they are now contraband.
90 days to turn them in for destruction or your subject
to a felony arrest.
That is what Bill Ruger (bless his little ol' heart) tried to do. If they do a large capacity magazine ban it should rightly be called "the Bill Ruger Magazine Ban to Save the Children and Prevent Global Warming Safety Law" or something to that effect.
"We have to do SOMETHING"!!!
In his letter to members of the House and Senate on 30 March 1989, Bill
Ruger stated in that which has come to be known as "The Ruger Letter":
"The best way to address the firepower concern is therefore not to try to
outlaw or license many millions of older and perfectly legitimate firearms
(which would be a licensing effort of staggering proportions) but to
prohibit the possession of high capacity magazines. By a simple, complete,
and unequivocal ban on large capacity magazines, all the difficulty of
defining "assault rifles" and "semi-automatic rifles" is eliminated. The
large capacity magazine itself, separate or attached to the firearm, becomes
the prohibited item. A single amendment to Federal firearms laws could
prohibit their possession or sale and would effectively implement these
objectives."
In addition to the furor amongst hunters, sportsmen and shooters caused by
"The Ruger Letter", Mr. Ruger made additional comments during an interview
with NBCs Tom Brokaw that angered 2nd Amendment proponents even further, by
saying that "no honest man needs more than 10 rounds in any gun…" and, "I
never meant for simple civilians to have my 20 and 30 round magazines…"