3914 Lady Smith - Range Report

HarrishMasher

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2011
Messages
1,721
Reaction score
2,653
I had posted here a couple of weeks ago that I found a nice 3914 lady Smith on Gunbroker and purchased it. I finally got to pick it up yesterday! The gun is absolutely in mint condition. It had not been shot that much and it certainly wasn't carried. Anything you see that looks like wear in the pictures below is just the lighting or oil/lube. While S&W made a pretty good number of the 3913 Lady Smith's which were the Stainless ones, they made VERY few of the 3914 Lady Smith's. I managed to score it on Gunbroker for $426.06. So I think I got an amazing deal. It even came with the Lady Smith Purse, cleaning kit, and all the paperwork. All of which is also in excellent condition.

41162719691_22bc69683a_k.jpg


41118791282_a3eec7965c_k.jpg


39094453940_284377256d_z.jpg


I have generally always had at least one S&W Gen 3 single stack 39xx in my collection, but for some reason I have always wound up selling them. At different times over the past 15 years I have had two 3913 Lady Smiths (one was an 3913NL), two regular 3913 pistols, and one 3953 (DAO variant of the 3913). So who did I get rid of them? And why did I buy another???

Aside from the fact that I generally avoid guns that have slide-mounted safeties/decockers, the vast majority of the compact single stack Gen 3 Smiths are stainless steel. I just don't love the look of pistols that are ALL stainless. A two-tone I can live with, but I never seem to hold on to stainless semi-autos very long. However, note that the 3914 is BLUED, and I have NEVER had a blued single stack S&W Gen 3 before. It also only has the safety/decocker on one side of the slide; which I can live with. I can't, however, live with safety/decocker on both sides of the slide; it is just awkward in too many ways. I don't see myself ever selling this Blued 3914 with the single decocker/safety.

I would have bought one of the Double Action Only compact Gen 3 pistols, but I briefly owned the 3953 and I really disliked the trigger system. It was like a revolver trigger. Which is great for a revolver, but a very long trigger reset on a semi-auto pistol is just not at all for me. I look for a very short reset on the semi-auto pistols I buy and carry. That's what I like about trigger on the DA/SA Gen 3 Smiths, they have a super short reset!

In my opinion, the S&W Gen 3's are some of the best single stack DA/SA 9mm pistols ever made. While I am not generally a fan of DA/SA triggers, I personally think a DA/SA trigger is not such a bad thing on a smaller compact carry gun. Ever since I had my daughter 3 years ago, my striker-fired guns with no safeties have given me a bit of pause. I find myself carrying guns with safeties since she was born. I'm not saying everyone should do this or there is something inherently unsafe about a striker-fired trigger with no safety; it's just my personal preference at the moment.

Turning to the 3914 I actually purchased, after doing the transfer paperwork I headed to the range at the back of the shop that did the transfer for me. I broke the gun down and applied some much needed lube. Why is it that ever single gun I buy on Gunbroker, which is an average of 2 a month lately, come absolutely bone dry? It was clear the gun had been cleaned, nothing was dirty inside, but there was not a drop a lube anywhere. Not only do I lube my guns regularly, I run them pretty wet. Machines need lubrication to run properly, so lube them up fellas!

After lubricating the Lady Smith I proceeded to run a 150 rounds through it. I will show you my results, they give some initial impressions of the 3914 LS.

Here is the first two groups I shot today right after I picked up the 3914 LS and lubed it. They are 8-round groups I shot at about 8-9 yards offhand. The mags hold 8 rounds, so 8 round groups are what you get.[/size=4]

41118791522_3685eb7a2b_k.jpg



How is this for a strange looking group??? 124gr Federal HST 8 rounds at 8-9 yards offhand[/size=4].

41118791602_2e88846833_k.jpg


Judging by my results one might think the gun is shooting below the point of aim. The gun DOES NOT shoot low, I just always struggle with the factory S&W sights that are on the Gen 3 compact pistols. You can see my first shot hit low and I literally worked my way up to the bullseye one shot at a time! If I can't find a set of Straight 8 Night Sights for it (my favorite sights), I might have to do a black rear and front night sight. We will see what I can find.

I am going to need to spend more time with my 3914LS until I can finalize my thoughts about it. But I wanted to mention a couple of things about my shooting experience today with the 3914. The gun was completely reliable in the 150 rounds of mixed 9mm ammo I put through it today. I ran 115gr, 124gr and 147gr factory FMJs. I also ran Federal HST ammo in the 124gr and 147gr standard pressure varieties. Every round fired and ejected flawlessly. Which is exactly what I have come to expect from Gen 3 Smith & Wesson pistols.

The other observation I want to share...I was very surprised how nicely this compact single stack handles recoil; it is surprisingly mild and very controllable. One of the reasons it surprises me, the axis of the bore is noticeably higher above my hand than with the Gen 3 Smiths when compared to most modern polymer guns. That's why I was surprised it felt like this gun has less recoil than my Glock 19. I will have to shoot them side by side to confirm that though!

Once I have had a chance to replace the sights, get a bunch more rounds downrange, purchase a quality holster, and come the recoil side-by-side with a Glock 19, I will write up a more detailed report. Thanks for reading!
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Nice report. My impression is that any 3rd Gen will out shoot any Glock any time of the day.

That's just me being completely anti Glock. ;)

That being said, I do find that my 3rd Gen compact 9mm guns (whew) tend to be bullet fussy. 115gr shoots consistently low, 124gr shoots much closer to point of aim, and 147gr will shoot where you aim.

The first two groups you shot look like what I get with 115gr.

Your 124gr grouping is indeed a bit odd. I tend to string a bit like that when my hand becomes fatigued after a lot of shooting.

My totally unsupported theory is that 3rd Gen (and most 9mm of that period) were designed for use with 147gr.

115gr became popular during the ammo shortages, but I don't think it's optimal.

Just my pet theory.
 
About what would be expected from 39xx. The indoor range I'm a member of has 50' only distance, so I only get to shoot at that 25ish' range when I'm out in the sticks. And then focus more on draw, presentation, and making the steel silhouettes sing. Not a bullseye gun, but super reliable and more than accurate enough to get the job done. Nice pistol...first 3914ls I've ever seen. Did you find out how many were produced?
 
About what would be expected from 39xx. The indoor range I'm a member of has 50' only distance, so I only get to shoot at that 25ish' range when I'm out in the sticks. And then focus more on draw, presentation, and making the steel silhouettes sing. Not a bullseye gun, but super reliable and more than accurate enough to get the job done. Nice pistol...first 3914ls I've ever seen. Did you find out how many were produced?

I don't know how many were produced. I have seen pics of them before, and certainly of the standard 3914. But the LS version is definitely a rare bird. You don't see them very often.

But if anyone knows how many were made, please share!

As far as accuracy goes, I can do much better with this gun. Different sights would make a huge difference for me. I put a set of Straight 8 configured night sights on my tiny Glock 42 380 and can do this at 10 yards offhand.

35762937206_d52f302819_z.jpg
[/url]


This is me with a S&W J Frame at 10 yards. I assure you the 3914 is easily as accurate as my snubby!

35714222414_e5349a18c6_k.jpg



And the same with the 3914's successor the M&P Shield at 10 yards:

35594267892_d77a5001fa_b.jpg


35764063875_ffc8934e92_b.jpg



There is no doubt I can shoot 1.5" groups at 10 yards offhand with the 3914 if I had it set up to my liking. I would expect performance much closer to this with a gun the size of the 3914:

36106057132_75a536a5ea_k.jpg
 
Last edited:
That's some nice shooting.

And a beautiful 3914--kinda makes me wish I had my 3913TSW back.

I can't get groups like you're getting with striker-fired guns. Granted... I don't shoot SF guns very often. But with a G19, my target resembles something like a tight dispersion of shot from a 12 gauge. I just can't time the trigger break correctly to keep the gun in the same place each time.
 
Back in the early to mid 1990s I carried a 3914 for a while. Very nice gun! Easy to shoot, conceal and carry. I liked it a lot. I've never really cared for a bobbed hammer, so I put a standard hammer for a 5906 in it. Worked perfectly. ;)
But when the CCW laws changed here in 1996, it got put away in favor of my Colt Commander. I don't think it even came out of the safe for several years. I finally sold it during the Y2K scare. Many times I've wished I had kept it. :(
 
Back
Top