5 Shot Snubby of CCW?

An altercation with a 300lb man armed with a blade in a bathroom will almost assuredly involve contact being made. If you think you can hold a #2 just because you took a Craig Douglas class, have done some force-on-force training and routinely practice rention shooting at the range, good luck with that.

I'm not much of a huge fan of .357 magnum out of a lightweight snub. I've seen way too many incidents of crimp jump to dismiss it, plus there's the controllability factor and to a lesser degrees, failures in one form or another. Most civilian defense scenarios take place inside 3 yards. One handed shooting is the norm at such distances and justifiably so since mobility and using the off hand for protection are often required and I don't see the relatively slight ballistic advantage the magnum offers worth the trade-offs and risks.
 
An altercation with a 300lb man armed with a blade in a bathroom will almost assuredly involve contact being made. If you think you can hold a #2 just because you took a Craig Douglas class, have done some force-on-force training and routinely practice rention shooting at the range, good luck with that.

I'm not much of a huge fan of .357 magnum out of a lightweight snub. I've seen way too many incidents of crimp jump to dismiss it, plus there's the controllability factor and to a lesser degrees, failures in one form or another. Most civilian defense scenarios take place inside 3 yards. One handed shooting is the norm at such distances and justifiably so since mobility and using the off hand for protection are often required and I don't see the relatively slight ballistic advantage the magnum offers worth the trade-offs and risks.

I agree with your position on j-frames being enough — IF — the risk your protecting against is being the target of an opportunistic predator. You just happen to cross paths with an ambush predator(s) and he/they think you will be an easy mark. They aren’t looking to get shot. I think pocket .380’s work in that scenario also.

If your life circumstances put you at a higher threat level, say from a determined, vengeful ex-husband or an ex-con you put in prison, I’d want more than five. That’s how I look at it anyway.
 
You're right, just a hit in the head isn't enough. It has to be in the 4"x3" zone in the center. Only there is it a guaranteed stop.

We agree on many things, Rastoff.

This is not one of them.
 
When I am invited out I CCW a 12 gauge M870 with magazine extension, a M1 Carbine with a 30 round magazine, two M1911 .45acp pistols, two hand grenades, several fighting knifes, and a flame thrower on wheels.

*** I haven't been invited out in several years. I am unsure if being nude or under armed was the reason ?

I'd say it's a safe bet to say you're ready for whatever! Just need someone who can fly in airstrikes for you when you need it.
 
I have defended using a revolver, even using a single action, but this attitude is misplaced.

From the article posted by Mister X:Just because a .38Spl can stop a bad guy doesn't mean it will. Remember, you have to hit that bad guy with that tiny piece of lead. That's easy to say on the internet, but not so easy to do in practice, even at a quiet range. It's very difficult to do under the pressure of potentially being killed by a moving, angry bad guy who's got body armor or is on drugs.

Very well said! Situational awareness is crucial as is the ability to perform well under intense immediate pressure and it's never gonna go how you expect and no matter if it happens to you once or ten times, you'll always look back and find at least SOMETHING you did wrong and need to improve upon. Something is bound to happen that you don't expect. It's like crashing on a motorcycle, only the people who have experienced it can tell you what they were able to do.
 
War Story - 20 years ago or so, I joined a department that had recently transitioned from S&W Model 66 to the then newer 4043. The predominant off-duty gun was the J Frame and a few of the most tactically minded guys had purchased 4053s.

There were some mostly younger, more tactically aligned guys who lobbied for allowing personally owned Glocks and SIGs. Two years later, 75% of the officers were carrying something other than Smith & Wesson. Most of the off-duty guns were Glock 23s, SIG P229s and a few G27s. The old guys with mortgages and kids in college were the only guys who didn’t switch. The dozens of guys and gals that switched wanted more rounds, less weight and better ergonomics - on duty and off.

I had a J Frame then with speed strips. I carried a J Frame last week on vacation out of state (swimming pool) and frequently as a winter pocket gun. My frame of reference is five-round J Frames are dated, but nothing carries quite the same.

To the original posters question, I switched to a Glock 26 years ago, which has more than twice as many of a more effective cartridge at an equivalent size to a J Frame. Now I have 12round Magpul magazine that allows 13 to be carried and a tactical light on the Glock. No way a G26 is as comfortable to carry as a J Frame but the additional capacity and speed of reloading were major determinants for me. Bonus is that the G26 shot better for me out of the box and requires less practice to remain proficient.

On capacity, the Trolley Square incident in SLC is what I think of when someone says X-amount of rounds are enough off-duty or in a civllian scenario. Same for the Skokie IL shootout where more than 15 .45ACP rounds did not get the job done against a determined felon.

I am here because I am just old enough to appreciate classic Smiths. My guess is most of the folks speaking up for the five-shot J Frame are over 40 and predisposed to be good shooters.

I am almost 40,but not quite yet, couple more years to go! I do carry a J frame every day, but I am a recent convert to revolvers. I grew up shooting all kinds and I never liked revolvers at all. Always loved semi autos and never wanted anything but. I loved so many of them. As of a couple years ago, I started watching a lot of old black and white private detective shows and movies and being that I love all things 50's-70's I started to wonder why I didn't like revolvers. I bought a snubby and then 4 more of them. I was and am madly in love with a gun I swore I'd NEVER own. I do like them because they are old school, I'll admit to that, but they do make pretty practical guns even still. I believe everyone should own, love and carry whatever they like. If someone doesn't like revolvers then so be it. I guess a lot of people who dislike revolvers feel that they are such and old design and aren't technologically advanced that you may as well throw a rock in self defence. The thing is, for me at least, I cannot speak for other revolver owners, I carry a gun to get me out of a gun fight or out of a self defence situation, not to engage in them. If I'm in a store or a bank, I absolutely will not try to intervene unless it meant my life or someone else's. I am in no way, shape or form trying to die over some money some insurance company may have to pay off. It's not like they'd reward me if I did stop it. I have a gun with enough rounds to, when needed, get me out of harms way and back to safety. If I had to shoot someone in self defence, I'm going to try my best to just incapacitate that person, not kill them. I don't even wanna deal with the legal nightmare of that. If I have a gun that can shoot someone and I get the drop on that person first, I'm going to use it to get me out of there. I don't think more than 5 will "likely" be needed to accomplish that. There is a chance I HAVE to be involved in a firefight, but again, my goal would be to get out of there, not stop everyone shooting at me. It's just that the chances of something like that happening to me are about the same as winning the lottery. Yes it is possible, that's why I carry, but I highly doubt that will ever happen to me.

As far as the church shooting (I believe that's what you were referencing, sorry if I'm wrong), I would never think to take a gun into church. However, had someone been armed in there, even with just 5 rounds, they may have been able to stop the guy before more than a couple or any people were dead. Yes, in that situation, I'd wish I had an auto, but if someone drew a gun as this guy is pulling out his, he could've been dead before anyone else was hurt. I feel any gun is better than no gun. Even my Derringer, when I have to go places I don't want my gun to possibly show, I grab my 38 spec Derringer. It's only 2 single action shots, but at least it's something. Plus I still carry my speed strips just in case. I don't normally carry that, but it still makes me feel a lot safer than not having it. If someone else has a gun out and you point a Derringer at them at close enough range, very many may think twice before doing something stupid because at least one bullet is gonna hit them. I would imagine there are at least a good amount of criminals who would give up at the risk of being shot. Not all would, in fact maybe even most wouldn't, but I'll take it over nothing any day. I'm guessing that played a part in that guy's decision to go to a church. He probably assumed no one would have a gun and criminals will act differently if they know that no one has a gun as opposed to knowing they do. Anything is possible, and if I was in a jam and needed more than my 5 and back up 10 rounds, I'd certainly hope someone with an auto would join in and help out, but the likelihood of that happening to any one person has got to be astronomically small. Again, I think everyone should carry what they want, but I truly belive situational awareness and ability to use what you have play a far larger role in SD situations than the type of gun or caliber it holds. Plus, some people intentionally put themselves in harms way and I dont really do that so I think trouble would have a harder time finding me at an exact location at an exact time for a very short duration. Like I said in other posts, anything is possible, I could even win the lottery, but even though I play I'm not making plans for that giant paycheck because it probably won't happen.

It's just really weird for me though because a couple years ago I was on the other side of the fence and even hated revolvers. I was so far on the other side of the fence, I couldn't even see the fence. Now I wonder how I ever lived without revolvers especially my J frames.
 
Last edited:
Why a 5 shot today, kinda pointless.?
I don't carry a 5 shot, but I can see some value. Especially in the scenario you've brought up. I can jab a 5 shot revolver in the chest of a bad guy and still fire it. Can't do that with a semi.

Also, we have to live in reality. I can't have the perfect defense for every possible situation that might or might not come up. What I can do, is prepare for the most likely situations. For me, being assaulted by a 300lb guy in a bathroom is so unlikely it's as close to impossible as probability will allow. So, no, I don't train for that.
 
I would be stunned if I ever met anyone that agreed with me 100%. Even so, what is it that we don't agree on here? That shooting someone in the cranial ocular cavity isn't a guaranteed stop?

Yes. Principally, bullets can and do bounce off skulls. They'll even do very odd things like enter in the front, travel under the skin, and exit out the back. They'll get stuck in gums and teeth. Skulls are designed to protect the brain from penetrating injuries. That's their job, and they're good at it.

Second, I don't believe striking the CNS guarantees incapacitating damage. Remember this guy?

boy-in-the-window-640x409.jpg


He wasn't just limping from being hit in the leg. He was shot in the brain. He was conscious, but had difficulty speaking. Still, he got up, made his way to a window, and managed to crawl out of it. If he can do that, I'm pretty sure Cletus can get another couple stabs in.

The immediate results of traumatic brain injuries are unpredictable. Peter and Joan Porco were attacked by their axe-wielding son. After the attack, Peter got up out of bed, retrieved the paper from the front yard, made himself a bowl of cereal, and started back up the stairs before he finally collapsed and died.

Third, I believe the difficulty of the shot must also factor in. The head is a small, moving target. If you miss it, your shot is wholly ineffective. In comparison, the torso is big and full of important stuff. If your counter to my "bullets bounce of skulls" objection is to dismiss such things as misses, well, you might as well ask for someone to simply shoot their attacker's trigger finger off.

Now, to be clear, if you're dumping round after round into the Center of Cletus and he's not dropping, it's time to shoot someplace else. But to me, a lot of the "just aim for the head" hyperbole sounds an awful lot like "just shoot the knife/gun out of his hand".
 
I have an unusual way of looking at carry. It is pretty simple, stay within the law, carry what YOU feel is the best choice for YOU. No need in debating it with persons who will likely never wear your shoes.
 
Why not have two spare tires in your trunk instead of one?

Why not install a sprinkler system in your house in case of fire?

Why not wear body armor 24/7?

Why not put bullet resistant glass in your home's windows?

These are all things you can do, but few do them. Wonder why?

Bingo! That is correct.
 
I don't carry a 5 shot, but I can see some value. Especially in the scenario you've brought up. I can jab a 5 shot revolver in the chest of a bad guy and still fire it. Can't do that with a semi.

Also, we have to live in reality. I can't have the perfect defense for every possible situation that might or might not come up. What I can do, is prepare for the most likely situations. For me, being assaulted by a 300lb guy in a bathroom is so unlikely it's as close to impossible as probability will allow. So, no, I don't train for that.

Unlikely is why we carry though isn't it? Again, I am fine with anyone's choice, but the rationalizations are funny for the most part. As to contact shooting, can be done with a semi, just don't push it into the guys body. Unless he is on top of me, I can likely do that.
BTW, any situation I can think of has actually happened at one time or another so saying it is unlikely is like saying I am fine playing golf in a lighting storm. Unlikely to be hit until you are. I just like people to think thru their decisions before committing because you ultimately live or die with that decision.
 
Last edited:
Let me set finances aside for a moment to consider if I would wear a Rolex or a Timex wrist watch?

If I still had an "outside job" working with my hands I would probably be practical and pick the budget timepiece.

But I'm at a place in my life where I enjoy the touch of nice things. I would probably chose a Rolex today. I would enjoy looking at it. Cleaning it and fondling it. They are beautiful, classic, and something to pass to one of my sons.

I don't wear a watch though. I have a smart phone that I can't escape. My job requires that I'm always in contact. So I carry that cellphone in a fine leather case instead of in a Wal*Mart toe sack stuck up under my belt.
If I want to know what time it is....I whip out that fancy cellphone of mine.

I carry my weapon everyday. I don't get into a gunfight everyday.

When my feet hit the floor I think about the Lucchese elephant boots that I'm going to slip my feet down into. I think about the Ranger belt with the silver buckle set and the starched jeans with creases. The starched roper long sleeve shirt. The Resistol or Stetson hat of the day.

Right then I decide if I'm going to want to carry a beautiful, classic S&W revolver or a sharp stick. I hold it up and admire the classic lines. The heft is comforting. It's cool steel from spending the night on the bedside table will soon be my own body temperature from the most intimate and personal contact with me. All day long I will be enjoying the comfort and luxury of that fine firearm next to me.

Why?
Because I can.

I have some semi-autos that I can shoot much further much more accurately. My finger gets tired pulling the trigger before I run out of rounds. I just don't get the same esthetic feel from them that I get from my steel S&W revolvers. They lack the beauty and feel of quality that my revolvers give me.

So what I'm telling you is that I could run a foot race better in sport trainers or tennis shoes but I feel better in a nice pair of boots. It's about what I do. The accessories that I choose for my mission.

Either you dig this trip or it's blowing past ya.
I'm not going to worry about shooting 5 guys tomorrow or 19 guys. I'm gonna worry about "The Total Package" of being outfitted with gear that will fit my needs, with style and class.

So is 5 rounds enough for what I have to do tomorrow?
I'm really thinking about this silver rodeo buckle that I saw last week end. It had this chrome plated, pearl handled one shot derringer mounted to it on a spring loaded hinge. You mash a hidden button on the top of the buckle and it springs out into action, firing a shot into the gut of the person standing in front of you.

Yeah, the longer I'm studying on this....I could probably get by tomorrow with just one bullet.

Very nice, I personally can dig it.
 
5 Gunfighting Myths Debunked By Massad Ayoob
5 Gun-fighting Myths - Massad Ayoob | 1911Addicts -The Premiere 1911 Forum For Enthusiasts

an interesting story why you need more the 5 or 6 shoots .. and officers who survive because they had those additional bullets to fire ..

I think autos are great for law enforcement, but not everyone is a police officer. They can be in harms way a lot especially based on where you work. If I had went into LE like I originally was going to, I'd expect at some point I'd have to shoot it out with someone regardless of where I work. I'd imagine that's a hazard of the job. However, I'm not in LE and I stay out of trouble these days. My chances of being involved in a big shootout are much smaller than someone who is issued a gun as part of the job.
 
Unlikely is why we carry though isn't it?
Indeed, but I find it interesting that when some have an issue with a particular choice, they always come up with an even more unlikely scenario.

Case in point:
I have ridden motorcycles a lot. I prefer a full face helmet. A friend once told me, "I'll never wear a full face helmet. If you go down, and are sliding feet first under a truck, the chin bar will catch on the rear axle can break your neck." True story and he only wore half helmets. But think about it, even if what he said about the chin bar were true (which is isn't), what are the odds of a person crashing their bike and sliding feet first under a truck? So rare I'll bet it's never happened.

Has someone been attacked by a 300lb person in a public bathroom? I'm sure it's happened. The possibility is just so low for me that I don't take it into consideration. I try to think of the most likely, and realistic, situations for me and prepare for those. Then if the weird one happens, I'm at least a little ready because of my practice.

Heck, I'll just settle for a person to practice anything at all with their carry gun because most don't. If there's no practice, it really doesn't matter what you carry. You'll be equally unprepared no matter what.
 
I live a pretty low risk life. I've always figured I'd be dead if it came to the point that I needed to reload.

Funny!!!

A low risk life and never smile in public..... most will not bother us........ AND
Don’t show up to sit in with a band, playing in a Biker bar, with my:
Harley Harley made of tin
Ride it out and push it in.
Baseball Cap.

A 460 Snub .... 5 shots that may prevent reloading. :D
 
Has MA ever been in a gun fight? If he has I have not come across the accounts of it.

While, to an extent, that argument holds (some) water, I would suggest the following:

(1) Being in a gunfight doesn't tell you very much about gunfights in general. Just the one you were in.

(2) I can't think of anybody who has studied more cases, and interviewed more survivors, than Ayoob.

In this case, I can't find anything to disagree with him on:

*Sometimes you need more than five or six shots.
*If your gun or extra magazine is in your car, you might as well have left it at home.
*Practicing point/instinctive shooting is good.
*Practicing aimed fire is good.
*Learning to hit stuff further than 3 yards away is good.
 
Back
Top