New Charter Arms .44 Bulldog

Another 44 Bulldog fan here. I had one several years ago, shot it a few times then sold it off to buy something else. Then I saw this one at my dealers a few weeks back. I got it for something like $325 or so. After all, I had 44 Special ammo. I needed a gun to go with it.





According to Charter it's from Bridgeport, circa 1983. It was dry as a bone when I got it, but a little oil, went a long way.
 
I had one in the early 1980s and really liked it but at the time there was very little 44 special brass around. I even had trouble finding factory rounds. This was before the S&W 24s were reintroduced. I found that I could use 45 acp brass resized by running them into a 44 S&W full length resizing die. The result was a short case that I reloaded to 44 S&W specs. I still have some those skinny 45 acp rounds with cast 44 bullets that worked fine in my bulldog.

I used to do the same thing, but over the years had forgotten about it. Your post brought back those memories. I am sure if I go dig around I could find some of that repurposed 45 acp brass.
I cast bullets during the winter months, think I will see if I can find that brass and stuff some of my cast 44’s in them for old times sake.

Interesting. How do those modified 45acp cases headspace since the brass has no rim and they are way shorter than the 44 special brass?

You must be resizing them the entire length of the case wall - including the web - all the way down to the extractor groove - to form a kind of semi-rim. Do they extract OK?

Otherwise I'd think that they'd just drop too far into the cylinders since they are too short to headspace on the mouth. I'd like to see a picture of some of those modified cases.
 
Last edited:
44 shorty

Interesting. How do those modified 45acp cases headspace since the brass has no rim and they are way shorter than the 44 special brass?

You must be resizing them the entire length of the case wall - including the web - all the way down to the extractor groove - to form a kind of semi-rim. Do they extract OK?

Otherwise I'd think that they'd just drop too far into the cylinders since they are too short to headspace on the mouth. I'd like to see a picture of some of those modified cases.


Yes, they have to be full length resized and the web has to be swaged down in the sizing die.
You start with a sized 45 acp brass, then size it in a 44 sizing die in increments, and you keep the brass wet with lube, otherwise you are courting disaster.
A sized 45 acp case at the base in front of the extractor groove is .471.....resized in the 44 die it becomes .465 and the rim of the cartridge is .476.
So the extractor will index and pull the case out, as you can see in the photo with my wife holding the Bulldog.
You can see the swaged web on the case on the left in the photo of the before and after photo.
While this can be done, I would never bother doing it while I can obtain 44 spl brass.
But this process is one those options a reloader has if he or she cannot find 44 spl brass.
 

Attachments

  • EF8357B4-94AA-4FDA-944F-D99A7F594590.jpg
    EF8357B4-94AA-4FDA-944F-D99A7F594590.jpg
    19 KB · Views: 115
  • 9D126270-2E10-4B5F-B5A8-B1AD444572D9.jpg
    9D126270-2E10-4B5F-B5A8-B1AD444572D9.jpg
    41.5 KB · Views: 95
Last edited:
Yes, they have to be full length resized and the web has to be swaged down in the sizing die.
You start with a sized 45 acp brass, then size it in a 44 sizing die in increments, and you keep the brass wet with lube, otherwise you are courting disaster.
A sized 45 acp case at the base in front of the extractor groove is .471.....resized in the 44 die it becomes .465 and the rim of the cartridge is .476.
So the extractor will index and pull the case out, as you can see in the photo with my wife holding the Bulldog.
You can see the swaged web on the case on the left in the photo of the before and after photo.
While this can be done, I would never bother doing it while I can obtain 44 spl brass.
But this process is one those options a reloader has if he or she cannot find 44 spl brass.

Good to know. I have 500 or 600 pieces of 44 special brass, but it is good to know this can be done in an emergency. Looks like the minimum charges and pressures are fairly close for a 200gr LRN using AA#2 for both the 44 spl and the 45acp.
 
Earlier this week, I took the Bulldog to the range (as I earlier mentioned it is probably a first year production Bridgeport), and I am somewhat disappointed with it. Picture below:
ptDEfmd.jpg


1. My handloads used an X-Treme plated 240 grain lead bullet. MV was chronographed at 628 ft/sec (average). Firing over sand bags seated at a bench, I was doing well to keep most shots on the paper at 50 feet. I might have been able to keep most shots in the chest area of a man-sized target at that distance, but not much better. After that performance I didn't even bother to try grouping by firing unsupported. No idea whether the problem was with the gun or my handloads.

2. Recoil was uncomfortable and unpleasant even with that mild load. I think much of that was due to the small grips which do not fit my hand well. I am thinking about looking for a larger pair.

3. Mechanical issues. First, opening the cylinder was a little difficult, and I found that it was usually easier to do it by pulling forward on the extractor rod knob than by using the thumb latch. Ponderiing this situation, I noticed that the cylinder release screw is just that - a screw. It can be screwed in too far or not far enough. If it is screwed in too far, the spring loaded plunger cannot be moved forward enough to release the cylinder. If it is too loose the cylinder cannot be closed. This is certainly an odd design, but I don't know what can be done about it. Has anyone else noticed this problem? Second, the cylinder has just enough lateral play to slip over the cylinder stop stud on the frame. This is somewhat disconcerting, and it seems that the stud should have about twice the height that it does. This is something that I had to be very careful about when unloading as the cylinder would move over the stud. Again, has anyone else encountered the same problem?
 
DWalt...I had the same problem with the cylinder screw thingy, and came to the same conclusion that you did. I found that a small screwdriver with the correct sized blade and a long shank could be used to screw the thing in and out. Curiously, what appeared visually to be the correct setting was not the most efficient. So I played with the screw in and out, each time pressing forward with the release button until it opened easily. With the hammer cocked, you can see where the screw is from above. I have some removable locktite that I am going to apply from the rear of the screw to hold it in place. Haven't done so yet, but don't see why that would not work well to keep the screw from working loose under recoil.

I haven't put any of the handloads that I mentioned above together yet, but I will be sure to post the results when I do. So far, I have only fired the cowboy loads that I posted above, with the 200 gr billets. The recoil was mild, and accuracy seemed good, but I was only firing at 21 feet (7 yards).

Best Regards, Les
 
I've wanted a Bulldog for years, but now my hands are too trashed to handle the recoil. Alas for wasted opportunity. I passed up a chance to buy an older one, finish-worn but mechanically solid, twenty years ago. Dry-firing it, I didn't notice any reset problem; but it was well broken in, to put it mildly.
 
Last edited:
"I have some removable locktite that I am going to apply from the rear of the screw to hold it in place. Haven't done so yet, but don't see why that would not work well to keep the screw from working loose under recoil. "

I had thought of the same thing to hold the cylinder release screw in position except I was thinking about applying a dab of Super Glue instead of Loctite. It's not under any particular stress, so the Super Glue should hold. Also could be easily dissolved by Acetone if needed. My original intent was to reload with some 180 grain .44 bullets which I thought I had some of, but when I looked, I had only the 240 grainers. So I used what I had. For sure, I will not be loading any more 240 grain bullets for use in the Bulldog.
 
Bulldog

Never encountered any mechanical issues with mine, but it sounds as though you an Les qre on the way of sorting your’s out.
As mentioned in my previous post, my handloads use either the Lyman 249241 or a cast wadcutter at 200 grains, or 200 grain factory loads.
The Bulldog weighs 19 oz’s, and it can be vicious when shooting the heavier bullets. Mine has the standard factory grips and I have large hands, which I end up with my little finger curled under the butt of the revolver.
Skeeter Skelton addressed the recoil in his article, he shot his normal 44 spl SWC load in the gun and the cylinder latch sliced open his thumb. This bulldog can bite.
I don’t have an answer for your accuracy issues, but I have not encountered what you document.
 
Last edited:
I bought one, about 40 years ago.

I was aware that the .44 Special was factory loaded "light", so didn't give recoil a second thought.

WOW ! Those lightly loaded factory rounds, really gave a thump ! I guess I am a wussy, as to recoil tolerance.

Even my even lighter loaded reloads, made it too unpleasant to routinely shoot, so I gifted it to a friend, that fancied it.
 
For anyone who has trouble with the recoil of the old Bulldogs with the wood grips, try a set of the "full combat" Neoprene grips that Charter has on their website. One size fits all Charters, old or new. They're about the most comfortable grips I've ever used. I had a set on a previous Bulldog, and they make a world of difference.

About $20.00 so it doesn't cost an arm and a leg to try them.
 
Last edited:
“About $20.00 so it doesn't cost an arm and a leg to try them.”

You will pay 1/2+ the cost of the stocks for shipping. I bought a pink set for my daughter for a .32 Long.
 

Attachments

  • C487995F-C633-4B09-941C-F83C876FBD0B.jpg
    C487995F-C633-4B09-941C-F83C876FBD0B.jpg
    87.2 KB · Views: 52
After looking harder, I did find some 180 grain .44 Cowboy bullets I earlier thought I had, they were just well-hidden. I am going to make up some light loads using them for the Bulldog this week. Haven't yet checked out the grip situation.
 
Quality has varied a good bit over the years. I owned a couple that were decent guns for the money, but had a couple that had various mechanical issues. The latest guns seem to be pretty well built. I had zero issues with my last one, but sold it when the S&W 69 came out.
 
Last edited:
I'm a big fan of the .44 Special and have several S&Ws in that caliber. A couple of years ago this popped up for sale locally and I just couldn't resist. :rolleyes:

BomCjIJ.jpg


It came with the box, all the paperwork, the original grips, a set of Pachmyer Compacts and the sales receipt showing it had been bought locally on Sept 4, 1985. It also came with a box of Remington 246 LRN ammo containing 45 rounds.
I bought it from its second owner who said the he knew the original owner. The story was that the first guy bought it new and fired 5 rounds. The guy I got it from said he had never fired it. Considering its condition, I believe the story. :D

BTW: those Pachmyer grips make a BIG difference in felt recoil. ;)
 
Last edited:
I have one of the originals that I carried as a BUG in '73 and '74. It's now in pieces, awaiting a barrel.
Around 5 years ago I found a bargain basement target bulldog. I run Pachs on mine also. It's a good shooter, but Lordy, is the finish ugly.
 
I ordered Pachmayr Presentation rubber grips for it yesterday. Seem to be somewhat larger than the factory wood grips. From eBay, $23.50 shipped, should arrive early next week.
----------------------------------------------------------
Grips arrived in the mail this afternoon. Feels great, should really tame the recoil:
VyUg6b9.jpg
 
Last edited:
I took the Bulldog out to play with the Pachmayr Presentation grips on it on Monday. I made up some loads using a 180 grain lead bullet (Cowboy) and 5.5 grains of 700-X. The average chrono MV was 777 ft/sec. Even with the large grips, the felt recoil was still fairly stout but at least tolerable. I may drop down the charge to somewhere in the 4.5-5.0 grain level to see if that is an improvement.
 
Back
Top