Model 610

[kmfleming]

I've noticed that Smith & Wesson has reintroduced the Model 610 in 4" and 6.5" barrel lengths. I am just wondering from those of you who own them which length you prefer. I see it is a N-Frame as well.

Thanks for any input

 

[S&W-Keeper]

I like my 4".Very accurate.

 

[AManWearingAHat]

I'm considering one for a backpacking / bear gun. I would be getting the 4". I think I will be waiting for the initial reviews to come out first.

 

[kmfleming]

I'm thinking the same thing. I'm partial to 4" revolvers. The only 6" i have is a Model 29. Of course I would have to see the reviews too.

 

[tlawler]

I've got a no dash 6.5 inch already, so I'm anticipating the addition of one of the new 4 inchers soon. My only 4" N frame so far is a .41 mag model 57 and I love the way it handles.

 

[jughed440]

4". Excellent woods carry and home defense revolver.

I sold the 6 1/2" because the small velocity increase compared to that of the 4" wasn't enough to carry it instead.

 

[Fazer386]

I vote FOUR INCH also. I packed a 6" 686-3 for a few years, then I stumbled into a 4" 586. I bring both guns on family camping trips, most prefer the 4" 586 with .38's vs magnum loads.

Get the 4" and never look back.

 

[Breakaway500]

Do the 610s use moon clips? Interesting development.I have a lot of 40 S&W and would like a revolver to shoot them, and bulk 40 is now very cheap as somehow..it has become the redheaded stepchild of ammo. Trends are so odd..

 

[Coastie762]

610's do indeed use moon clips. Shooting .40 S&W through a 610 is akin to shooting .38 specials through a .357 magnum.

As far as barrel lengths, I'll be the one to go against the grain here. I'm looking at the 6 1/2" barrel length. This will primarily be a range gun for me, the added sight radius when shooting irons is a plus. If I decide to use it for hunting, it'll likely get scoped and carried in a chest rig.

Not to say the 4" wouldn't work. Truth be told don't be surprised if I end up with one of those as well. I'm kind of weak-willed that way...

Now if S&W decided to release a 610 with a 5" barrel, I'd be at the head of the line!

 

[RSBH44]

Do the 610s use moon clips? Interesting development.I have a lot of 40 S&W and would like a revolver to shoot them, and bulk 40 is now very cheap as somehow..it has become the redheaded stepchild of ammo. Trends are so odd..

This is my sentiment as well. At this point I'm not really looking for another caliber to reload but since it will also shoot .40( which I have a ton of) I'd consider it.

 

[tlawler]

4". Excellent woods carry and home defense revolver.

I sold the 6 1/2" because the small velocity increase compared to that of the 4" wasn't enough to carry it instead.

Looking on BBTI it's about 100fps and 50ft/lb difference average. I agree that's not that significant of a difference to not go with the 4".

 

[Loyaljeeper]

Remember that on ballistics by the inch they don't include the cylinder length. A 4" revolver will actually have the same velocity as a 5" barrel tested. A 6" revolver will be the same as a 7" BBTI test.

 

[robertrwalsh]

I've got a 4" that like like just fine. I suspect a 6" with the full underlug would be a little nose heavy, but some people like them.

 

[colt_saa]

I am exceptionally fond of both the 6 1/2" and the 5"

I will be buying a 4" when they come out

I have re-chambered all of mt 310/610 revolvers to accept the 10MM Magnum cartridge

So now my revolvers can shoot all three of the cartridges

 

[Invictus357]

This reintroduction is fantastic news.

If you guys look closely at the new 610 the SW logo is stamped and not laser etched. Looks so much better.

I can't wait to get mine in 6.5".

 

[deputydon]

610's do indeed use moon clips. Shooting .40 S&W through a 610 is akin to shooting .38 specials through a .357 magnum.

As far as barrel lengths, I'll be the one to go against the grain here. I'm looking at the 6 1/2" barrel length. This will primarily be a range gun for me, the added sight radius when shooting irons is a plus. If I decide to use it for hunting, it'll likely get scoped and carried in a chest rig.

Not to say the 4" wouldn't work. Truth be told don't be surprised if I end up with one of those as well. I'm kind of weak-willed that way...

Now if S&W decided to release a 610 with a 5" barrel, I'd be at the head of the line!

I have a 5" but not a Classic. NO!, not for sale.

 

[colt_saa]

If you guys look closely at the new 610 the SW logo is stamped and not laser etched. Looks so much better.

I can't wait to get mine in 6.5".

The majority of the 610s already in the marketplace have roll-marked text and logos, not laser etched

 

[hkcavalier]

6.5" full underlug is just too muzzle-heavy for me. Out of the two, 4", but I'd rather have a 5". OR a 6" standard lug.

 

[Invictus357]

The majority of the 610s already in the marketplace have roll-marked text and logos, not laser etched

Yes that is true. Some years ago SW started laser etching most new revolvers.

I am glad they brought back the 610 with the roll-marking.​

 

[Groo01]

Groo here
Wish they put it on an L frame