DWalt
Member
This brings up another point. My first reaction to the above post was, "That would be awesome. I have a 45". Then I thought, "Why?". Do we really need the extra performance and cost? The vast majority of my bullets go through a sheet of paper then into a backstop. My 357 and 44 calibers kill deer handily. I believe they would work fine on two-legged varmints. Why should I pay more for a gun and loads?
I don't shoot large quantities of .400 Cor-Bon, I just like the idea of being able to shoot numerous calibers in the same gun, and I also like odd cartridge calibers. I have a M1911 (a real Colt M1911) set up to shoot 9mm, .38 Super, .45ACP, .400 Cor-Bon, and .22 LR. I haven't fired many rounds of .400 CB recently, but did shoot up two boxes yesterday. In my gun, the .400 CB groups better than .45 and shoots exactly to the fixed sights at 15 yards. I don't load .400 very heavily and only with lead bullets. The .400 CB does not provide any advantage in magazine capacity vs. the .45 ACP, and that probably makes it less attractive to many potential users.
Part of the attraction of the .400 CB to me is that it requires only a barrel change and a set of dies. I think I paid maybe $50 for a barrel around 10 years ago, off eBay.