Model 22 (45 ACP)

...Here is my pre-war commercial 1917 that someone cut the barrel down to 4".

Looks like someone was ahead of his times...

Depends on when the cut was made. What I find interesting is the reuse of the factory front sight and the front sight boss. That took a bit of skill to transplant it.

Mine is a bit different.

Kevin
 

Attachments

  • BEF670B3-0475-43AB-AE33-623B3214777B.jpg
    BEF670B3-0475-43AB-AE33-623B3214777B.jpg
    43 KB · Views: 101
  • 6DF1B4A0-39F5-4B99-93F6-7B08094B5ABE.jpg
    6DF1B4A0-39F5-4B99-93F6-7B08094B5ABE.jpg
    42.1 KB · Views: 82
  • 4CAA53E1-F376-4E0D-87D5-8E5C8531D1AA.jpg
    4CAA53E1-F376-4E0D-87D5-8E5C8531D1AA.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 82
  • 0CDA2C1E-6F0F-4191-96DB-A5A1CCC550BC.jpg
    0CDA2C1E-6F0F-4191-96DB-A5A1CCC550BC.jpg
    44 KB · Views: 77
  • 9DA7625A-9714-4EE3-A44B-4485123B4439.jpg
    9DA7625A-9714-4EE3-A44B-4485123B4439.jpg
    42.8 KB · Views: 75
Here is my pre-war commercial 1917 that someone cut the barrel down to 4".
Looks like someone was ahead of his times...

I found a Brazilian 1917 that was cut down to 4" for super cheap. No one wanted it because it was "Altered". It now wears Crimson Trace grips. My wife claimed it as hers:
 

Attachments

  • SW1917_BRAZIL.jpg
    SW1917_BRAZIL.jpg
    23.6 KB · Views: 131
I am a huge fan of 45acp revolvers and would love to one of those.
 
I want one

Having had this particular wheelgun for several years now, I decided to give you nice folks my impression of it.

Here is a stock picture of it from the IMFDb:

www.imfdb.org_images_thumb_a_ac_150195_large.jpg_450px_150195_large.jpg


Mine differs only in the presence of plainclothes Magna stocks and a T-grip adapter.

It is an N-frame S&W in 45 Auto with a 4" barrel and loads with either moonclips or with the 45 Auto Rim (AR) cartridges. 45 AR is ballistically identical to the 45 Auto rounds but instead of being rimless, it has an ultra-thick rim allowing for proper headspacing. Personally, I use the moonclips. They are quite fast to reload with and also prevent the cases from scattering all over the place.

A fair description of it could be that it is a 4" version of the M1917 wheelgun from WWI. I have the 'new' 5 1/2" (Model of 1917) version of it as well. Both this handgun and the new '1917' version are +P-rated. Unfortunately, S&W dropped their new Model 22 from the production line several years back. I forget the exact date I acquired them but it was after 2005 and before 2008.

The other day, I took it out to my range and gave it a workout. About 70-80 rounds went downrange and the gun handled well. Most, in fact, almost all of them were close range hip shots and the paper man was killed as dead as could be. The DA pull on this gun was quite good coming from the factory which is unusual, as many, if not most of this particular model as well as the M-1917 already referred to, had totally crappy triggers. Mine is good in that regard but the M-1917 produced around the same time, was not and my gunsmith had to do quite a bit of work on it before it was good.

I had an interesting encounter on my way to the range. I stopped and looked at some construction work and one of the local police chiefs happened by. I took the opportunity to show him my setup and he seemed to be favorably impressed with what he saw but suggested that I add some height to the berm, saying that if someone shot there who did not shoot well, it could be a problem. He also showed me the method of close-range hip or point shooting that the police are being taught here. It is basically a version of what refer to as the old speed-rock where the gun is held quite close to the body. It is no doubt familiar to many of you.

Anyway, back to the Model 22--if someone likes wheelguns and wants to carry a 45 ACP, this would be a good selection. It is rugged, and shoots a good combat-proven cartridge. I love mine.
... I want one now!
 
Depends on when the cut was made. What I find interesting is the reuse of the factory front sight and the front sight boss. That took a bit of skill to transplant it.

Mine is a bit different.

Kevin

Not difficult at all. You cut it off, file the bottom flat, file a flat on the barrel where you want it, and braze it on. I did this one:

c70f4180-0203-4d48-9974-e82d80664bef-zpsfff60db3.jpg
 
Last edited:
Yes, it has been done and usually with telltale braze lines or similar. The one I mentioned seemed seamless. Not normally seen.

Kevin

The one you mentioned is mine too. It’s just the angle of the photo and some cold blue. Otherwise they are the same.
 
I’ve shot 255’s loaded in a.c.p. brass in my M22. They shot well but POI was high for me. I like the idea though.

My gun shoots jacketed bullets very well, and also with “some” lead bullets. I have tried a few lead projectiles that have been horrible. Noticed a pretty big lead build up in the forcing cone. After a good cleaning I could see the forcing cone was very rough. I cut to 11 degrees and polished it smooth. So far I’m seeing some improvement with different lead rounds. More testing to come, but the lead build up is greatly reduced so far.

Dan
 
I've tried the Lyman #454424 SWC, about 255-260 grains in .45 ACP revolvers. As I recall, accuracy was good, but with significant recoil and my handloads weren't particularly heavy. I can't imagine what advantage there would be to using such heavy bullets over somewhat lighter ones that don't punish the shooter.
 
I've tried the Lyman #454424 SWC, about 255-260 grains in .45 ACP revolvers. As I recall, accuracy was good, but with significant recoil and my handloads weren't particularly heavy. I can't imagine what advantage there would be to using such heavy bullets over somewhat lighter ones that don't punish the shooter.

No advantage unless you’re shooting at critters. 😎

Dan
 
Here is my 22-4. Mine has the TRR serial number for Thunder Ranch but does not have the logo. I shoot mine with 230 grain FMJ in moon clips. I added some Pachmayrs instead of the magnas shown.
ARzQOe2.jpg

toyman-albums-s-and-w-gallery-1-a-picture21570-22-4-a.jpg

Very nice, I am looking for a nickel one to add to my rack.
That's interesting about the serial number.
I was not aware that they had produced any with the TRR prefix that were not blued.
I have two blue ones, one under TRR180 and one above TRR2060.

Ya never know what tidbit of info may pop up here. :D
 
Last edited:
I also have a TR 22-4. The nice thing about the .45 Thunder Ranch guns is that other than the serial number, the only nod to Thunder Ranch is the grips. On the .44 Special TR guns they added gaudy gold markings on the starboard side. Another plus with the .45 is that it shipped with a very nice green cordura case, even though the box was plain cardboard. The case is large enough to carry the pistol, some loaded moon clips, and is also big enough that my moon/demoon tool fits as well.

I don't mind the grips on my revolver, and added a T-Grip. One day I might put some stags on it.

Some of the early TR .45's had the wrong size front sight, but mine came with one that appears just right for 230 grain ammo and they print POA at 7 yards.
 
Groo here
I have a "few" 45acp revolvers.
The M-22 is a true and righteous "Fighting Revolver" [like the m10/13 and the M-58]
Every thing you "need" nothing you don't...
Tuff ,reliable , hard hitting,and lighter, but not an easer to damage target gun.
Wish mine was a RB though.[easer to fit grips to my hand]
My using guns tend to be SS or a non-rusting finish so I changer
to a TR m-325 ,, missed out on a Nightguard......
45acp has enough powder for most things, but if needed +p 250gr will mimic the 45colt and 45 super will come close to mid range 44 mag or heavy 44spec [aka Skeeter load]
 
Groo here
I have a "few" 45acp revolvers.
The M-22 is a true and righteous "Fighting Revolver" [like the m10/13 and the M-58]
Every thing you "need" nothing you don't...
Tuff ,reliable , hard hitting,and lighter, but not an easer to damage target gun.
Wish mine was a RB though.[easer to fit grips to my hand]
My using guns tend to be SS or a non-rusting finish so I changer
to a TR m-325 ,, missed out on a Nightguard......
45acp has enough powder for most things, but if needed +p 250gr will mimic the 45colt and 45 super will come close to mid range 44 mag or heavy 44spec [aka Skeeter load]

For a round butt, consider the Model 625-6 Mountain Gun but it has adjustable sights. The are some “fixed” sights that are designed to replace adjustable sights. Or consider having the Model 22-4 rounded. Here is a Model 28-2 I round butted back in the 80s. Also a Model 625 MG that wears a pair of rb/sb conversion stocks I built for it.

Kevin
 

Attachments

  • CF8AFEA9-666B-402D-8831-4EB6D72E8821.jpg
    CF8AFEA9-666B-402D-8831-4EB6D72E8821.jpg
    104.7 KB · Views: 52
  • 03AA7E74-3F35-4111-9B5B-CC5C339274DA.jpg
    03AA7E74-3F35-4111-9B5B-CC5C339274DA.jpg
    106.6 KB · Views: 47
Sorry for the late reply.

It's actually a mixed bag. I qualified with and carried a 625 (among other guns) when I was a PI in Kansas, so I am familiar with it, and I liked the stainless steel, but the action on the 625, while it was good in mine, was not as good as the one in my 4" Model 22.

And that is strange because most of the actions of the 22's that came from the factory had abysmal trigger pulls. Mine was one of the relatively few exceptions.

I also have another Model 22 with a 5 1/2" barrel that is a dead ringer for the 1917 of WWI fame. That one really gave me problems, as I could not count on it going 'bang' when I fired it. That one went to two gunsmihs one of whom finally mostly fixed the problem. It had a very rough action which was what I took it to the first smith for and all he seemed to have done was to lighten the trigger pull by bending the mainspring.

So, my experiences with S&W 45 ACP wheelguns has been a mixed bag.

Here is my problem child.

thumbnail_img_0289-1-jpg.183934


As long as I don't shoot stuff with hard primers, it does all right. It is soon going to my gunsmith for a longer firing pin.
 
I got a 22-4 barrel from the factory to put on a Brazilian from the first shipment. With heavy loads i did get some bullet creep. Later tried the same load in my 628-8 and no creep. That demonstrates the big difference in the weight of the two. I also changed the front sight on the 22-4 barrel, very easy to do and made it much easier to get a good sight picture.
 
Back
Top