Show me where in the Constitution it says anything about training, fees, AR's, pistol braces, etc.
You all did take an oath, correct?
You all did take an oath, correct?
Sure, but involving government at any level is bad. I don't trust any of them. Especially around here.
Give em an inch...........
Unfortunately, the good pastor likely assumed merely presenting the weapon would allow him to control the situation. He compounded that mistake by being close enough to the assailant for him to initiate a struggle for the gun.
All the soul searching about killing needs to be done before introducing deadly force into the mix.
That's a cop out my friend. You can't have it both ways. Yes you explained why. "You are not in favor of everyone carrying " says it all. It's okay for some but not others.
That statement suggests that you want restrictions on people that YOU think shouldn't carry.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion. I don't care either way. But your statement says much more than you think it does.
Do you drive a car? Is your Doctor licensed? There are all sorts of things that require a license and those are issued by the state. The CCW is a license in most states. However, that said I don't care if the individual has a license. I just want them safe to care. Just like a Hunter Safety Course. Do you think that is to much to ask?
Actually, no - it doesn't.
Show me where in the Constitution it says anything about training, fees, AR's, pistol braces, etc.
You all did take an oath, correct?
And I'm not really in favor of it.I don't favor unwed motherhood...
Again, not what I said. I don't favor everyone carrying.The Constitution for me, but not for thee.
Show me in the Constitution where having a driver license is required. We have laws and that is what makes a civilization. Some laws we agree with and some laws we do not. Where in the Constitution does it call for a CCW?
! took an oath to defend the country against all enemies foreign and domestic. Is there someone here an enemy?
Presuming to know what another person thinks or wants is fraught with the risk of utterly misunderstanding what was said. I try to stay with what folks say while avoiding extrapolation.Yes it does. But let's call it good because we don't agree.
....I suspect, without any proof, he just hesitated to fire. Tragic.
That sums it up to me.
A couple questions we'll never know the answer to. Like did the pastor try to fire, only to forget to disengage a safety. Did he forget to chamber a round. We don't know what kind of gun the pastor drew.
I suspect, without any proof, he just hesitated to fire. Tragic.
Presuming to know what another person thinks or wants is fraught with the risk of utterly misunderstanding what was said. I try to stay with what folks say while avoiding extrapolation.
You're correct in believing that we don't agree.
Again, not what I said. I don't favor everyone carrying.
Your mechanical reading skills seem fine; comprehension seems off. What people say is what they say.You said you were in favor of some not carrying guns. How is that a misunderstanding?
It's quite clear. I comprehend English just fine. I simply read your statement and have come to correct conclusion that you want to limit gun rights. There's no other way to interpret your statement. None.
If that's not what you meant then retract or change your statement.
Thank you the right question. I could care less who carries so long as they understand that a firearm is not a magic wand, and that poor judgement on their part one way or the other will have consequences. Don't carry if you don't have the requisite skills and judgement.Who DO you favor carrying?