Mine here in Florida has a photo very much like a drivers license. We have to renew them every 7 years. Of course for the original they require fingerprints and background checks. And we are still a gun friendly state with a fantastic governor.
Here in Florida our pictures are on our concealed weapons permits but our addresses no longer are.
I had not noticed that. I renewed mine last year and not sure if the one before had the address or not.
Missouri doesn't. The CCW permit is only valid when accompanied by valid state photo ID . . .
Doesn't seem to make sense, having your picture on the CHP. There's also a bill to make the current carry permit permanent, so over time, your picture wouldn't match up with you as you age anyway.
I have no problems with a photo CHP ID. At least whomever in the legislature is proposing these changes is doing it in favor of concealed carry, considering the current atmosphere in D.C.
Not necessarily.Your first sentence and your third sentence are in direct conflict . . .
K
I don't see the issue. It's 2021. And this has been ongoing since 30 or 40 years ago. All government identification cards have pictures. Drivers' licenses, military ID, Federal, State, and local employment IDs/credentials, and gun licenses and permits. Even my Dallas Police Department Volunteer ID card has my picture on it.
As a matter of fact, Texas uses the same picture on TDLs and LTCs. Saves a lot of time and trouble.
No politics. It's a no brainer and pictures ought to be required. If North Carolina was issuing concealed handgun permits without photos they were in the Dark Ages............
Not necessarily.
Paraphrasing...
1st sentence:
"Having a photo on the CHP doesn't make sense."
3rd sentence:
"Shrug."
That's not an accurate paraphrase. Your response is duly noted . . .
It's an interpretation to clarify the possible meaning. By definition, a paraphrase is not an accurate quote.![]()
Here in Florida our pictures are on our concealed weapons permits but our addresses no longer are.