First time reloaded at the range.

Pat73

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
18
Reaction score
13
Location
Quebec, Canada
After more than a year reading books and lurking on forums, i finally try my hand at reloading. I used my 629-6 and my Henry Big Boy.

I've used once fired Starline brass with IMR 4227, CCI 300 and some 240gr plated bullets from a Quebec company, Campro.

The loads where:
20.4, 20.7, 21, 21.3, 21.5, 21.9, 22.2, 22.5, 22.8 and 23.1 target was at 15 yards for revolver and 50 yards for my lever action.

From 20.4 up to 21.3, the recoil was strong, but ok and grouping was 1" to 1/4"

From 21.5 to 23.1 recoil was very strong and grouping grew bigger than 3"

For the lever action, all reloaded ammo where excellent and grouping was 3/4" for all rounds.

I need more practive with the revolver. Only down side was the unburnt IMR 4227 kernel no mather the amount of powder and how dirty it was.

Needless to say i will try the other powders bougth last month:
Titegroup, HP-38, Universal, Hs6 and W572.

Please feel free to gave me advice on all powder i have and that you are using.
 
Register to hide this ad
HP-38 and HS-6 are usually for non-magnum loads.

Your 4227 loads in the carbine are not the fastest you will find, but accuracy will be hard to beat! I sold my 44 mag lever guns long ago, but 4227 is my prefeed powder in 357 carbine.

Ivan
 
IMR4227, in the work-up I did for 44 mag revolver, required a very heavy crimp to lessen the unburnt powder. Were you still getting unburnt powder with the rifle ?
You listed those powders in burn rate, titegroup being the fastest, W572 being the slowest.
Of those 5 I would be trying W572 first as it's a faster burner than IMR4227 and shouldn't be a unburnt powder problem. Next would be HS6.
 
IMR4227, in the work-up I did for 44 mag revolver, required a very heavy crimp to lessen the unburnt powder. Were you still getting unburnt powder with the rifle ?
You listed those powders in burn rate, titegroup being the fastest, W572 being the slowest.
Of those 5 I would be trying W572 first as it's a faster burner than IMR4227 and shouldn't be a unburnt powder problem. Next would be HS6.

In fact, i had unburn kernel in both revolver and carbine. I use the Lee factory roll crimp die. So, you suggesting me that i use a stouter crimp?

I will post a pic of one of my dummy round tommorow. As a new reloader, achieving a good roll crimp is a bit a mistery.
 
IMR 4227 is my choice magnum hand gun powder . I ALWAYS , ALWAYS use a full magnum primer . In the 44 magnum CCI 350 . Not one of those " in between primers " like Winchester , Remington . 23 grs is my 44 magnum load using a 245 gr swc , the " real " keith bullet . I shoot them in my 2 , 29-10's . One is a 4 " barrel and the other is 6.5 " . Regards Paul
 
As promised yesterday, i took pictures of my dummy rounds.

Both are 240gr bullets crimped with the Lee crimping die.

It's hard for me to tell a weak from a stout crimp.

Please let me know what you think.
 

Attachments

  • 20210322_173507.jpg
    20210322_173507.jpg
    76.9 KB · Views: 160
  • 20210322_173552.jpg
    20210322_173552.jpg
    65.5 KB · Views: 130
IMR 4227 is my choice magnum hand gun powder . I ALWAYS , ALWAYS use a full magnum primer . In the 44 magnum CCI 350 . Not one of those " in between primers " like Winchester , Remington . 23 grs is my 44 magnum load using a 245 gr swc , the " real " keith bullet . I shoot them in my 2 , 29-10's . One is a 4 " barrel and the other is 6.5 " . Regards Paul

I will try cci 350 next time. I have 100 at hand right now. Thank's for the tips.
 
Did your bullets have a cannelure? It looks like a fairly deep inset just above the crimp. I normally use a standard roll crimp with good success in both lever guns & revolvers, plus my bullets do not have a cannelure. An image is below. To me, the crimp looks deep and the brass looks distressed, not smooth at the crimp location. Hopefully others will comment on the use of the Lee crimping die.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • P1010002.jpg
    P1010002.jpg
    73.2 KB · Views: 548
Did your bullets have a cannelure? It looks like a fairly deep inset just above the crimp. I normally use a standard roll crimp with good success in both lever guns & revolvers, plus my bullets do not have a cannelure. An image is below. To me, the crimp looks deep and the brass looks distressed, not smooth at the crimp location. Hopefully others will comment on the use of the Lee crimping die.

I love the Lee FCD's, and of course, one in a revolver caliber is going to have a roll crimp. I have one for every caliber I load.
One thing you might think of, though, and that is that you CAN get a Lee FCD in revolver caliber that are taper dies.
The reason for that is specifically for use with non-cannelured bullets.
If you run a strong magnum load, you should stay with cannelured bullets and roll crimp die. But if you back off to a mid range load with no cannelure, you might like how a taper die works for you.
Roll crimping a smooth bullet aggressively will deform the bullet and very likely affect accuracy.
As long as a crimp keeps the bullet in place when it should, no matter whether it's a roll or taper crimp, you're good to go.

Don't confuse all this with autoloader loads because those need taper crimps since autoloaders register on the mouth of the case and need the correct mouth width.
 
Last edited:
I've used once fired Starline brass with IMR 4227, CCI 300 and some 240gr plated bullets from a Quebec company, Campro.

I use the Lee factory roll crimp die. So, you suggesting me that i use a stouter crimp?

I've come to the decision, after working up many combinations, that I'm happier loading my plated bullets with medium/moderate speed powders (Power Pistol, LongShot), as the slowest powder, with them.

With those speed powders a taper crimp will suffice in aiding ignition & you'll avoid distorting your plated bullets by trying to get a meaningful roll crimp on them.

I save the slow powders for jacketed bullets which allow a firm roll crimp be used.

Typically plated bullets are restricted to slower speeds (than jacketed) which pairs them better with medium speed powders too.

.
 
There is a cannelure in the plated bullet. The bullet is seared halfay in the cannelure. Coal is 1.610"

So, what is it i'm doing wrong when applying the roll crimp?
 
Last edited:
Decker, I know how they work and their uses, but you did not comment on the appearance and quality of the OP's crimp. I am not sure that the original plated bullet had a cannelure either? The groove showing above the brass looks deeply inset and not smooth, plus the brass is distressed. His question is whether that crimp is excessive? My thought is that it is a very heavy crimp.

My tapered crimped calibers show no evidence of distressed brass and are so smooth that it is hard to even see the crimp other than the fact the the brass is set flush with the bullet when completed. I find that roll crimp cartridges work best for me in my lever-guns and the OP is shooting these in both a revolver and a lever gun. With that in mind, if I were loading one load for both guns, I would prefer a roll crimp. Lastly, I have pulled my plated bullets from their cases and inspected the bullets, finding only a smooth ring around the bullet which looks the same as a standard cannelure and no changes in the bullet dimensions, so do not think I am upsetting my accuracy in any way.

The issues of roll crimp vs taper crimp is long and often debated. I find that taper crimp will prevent bullets from traveling forward in the case, but do not do so well preventing bullets from getting pushed into the case when stacked in the magazine of a lever-gun. I recently shot with a friend with a 44-40. He had plated bullets installed with taper crimps and loaded his rifle with 10 rounds, then started shooting. By the third round, his gun jammed and after some hassle, he got the gun unloaded to find that the bullets were pushed into the case so far that they would not chamber. I have been shooting lever guns for decades with roll crimps and never had that issue, so think that the roll crimp may be better for seating bullets that will stay in place whether being pulled forward when shooting a large caliber revolver to getting shoved into the case from a magazine lever gun.
 
Last edited:
Regarding crimps, whether rolled, tapered, or what have you... there are no standards as to degree of crimp, so light, medium, and heavy have different meanings, depending on who is doing the interpreting.

I've found that whatever crimp method is being used, crimp enough to prevent bullet movement and no more. This is enough to insure complete proper powder burn as well, except in rare instances.

Don't take blanket Internet advice on crimping. Try crimps at three different levels and shoot some benchrested groups. Do this at 25 yards and you'll quickly find out what works best, paying attention not only to group size but possible bullet movement in the case as well.

Use the Lee Factory Crimp Die if you wish. It isn't necessary if you're doing everything right, but may do no harm as long as you don't overdo things. Whether or not it offers any advantage, you be the judge of that based on your testing.
 
Did your bullets have a cannelure? It looks like a fairly deep inset just above the crimp. I normally use a standard roll crimp with good success in both lever guns & revolvers, plus my bullets do not have a cannelure. An image is below. To me, the crimp looks deep and the brass looks distressed, not smooth at the crimp location. Hopefully others will comment on the use of the Lee crimping die.

attachment.php

What is the seater/crimper that you use?

I have both a Hornady seat/crimp and Lee fcd.

Maybe i'll just take more time and properly adjust my Hornady die. I just notice that my Hornady press is camming, so that might explain why my bullet ended up seated deeper.
 
When you get a load that groups 1/4" ... it makes living with a few unburned grains of powder very easy .
Take that load and try it with a magnum primer... make up a few loads above it and a few loads below it and check results ... what you are doing is finding your guns "sweet spot" . 4227's burning is sometimes helped by the hotter magnum primer ... it usually leaves fewer unburned grains . The revolvers preferred load may not be the rifle's preferred load and that's where you might have to compromise ... If one of my guns shot 1/4" groups with a load , I would call it a keeper and if necessary work up another load for the other gun .
Chances are the 1/4" load will shoot well in the other .
I would definitly give the magnum primer a shot (bad pun)
Good Luck,
Gary
 
When you get a load that groups 1/4" ... it makes living with a few unburned grains of powder very easy .
Take that load and try it with a magnum primer... make up a few loads above it and a few loads below it and check results ... what you are doing is finding your guns "sweet spot" . 4227's burning is sometimes helped by the hotter magnum primer ... it usually leaves fewer unburned grains . The revolvers preferred load may not be the rifle's preferred load and that's where you might have to compromise ... If one of my guns shot 1/4" groups with a load , I would call it a keeper and if necessary work up another load for the other gun .
Chances are the 1/4" load will shoot well in the other .
I would definitly give the magnum primer a shot (bad pun)
Good Luck,
Gary

You're right on all counts. A magnum primer is often worth trying. It seems that shooters today needlessly obsess over "dirty" powders or "dirty" loads as well as a few flecks of unburned powder.

If they can get beyond this and concentrate on accuracy, they'll be way ahead. I only use conventionally lubed cast bullets in handguns so everything is dirty, but accurate. A real dirty handgun takes no longer to clean than one that is only slightly dirty, but some have yet to figure this out.
 
Once again, thank you all for sharing your knowledge with me.

I don't have a ransom rest nor a chronograph. During my last visit at the range, i found that 20,4 to 21.3 gr where pretty good, arround 1" to 3/4" at 25 yards and shoooting boths arms in the air . But, Lyman 50th edition show the starting load at 19.3 as opposed to Hornady 10th ed showing strating load as 20.4

By reading a lot about IMR 4227, it seem that this powder is more accurate near top load and compressed. But, the target reacquisition is longer for me. Also, i'm concerned about the well being of my 629-6 for always shooting full magnum load all the time.

As for "dirtier" powder, it's a little concern to me. Cleaning is also part if the ritual.
 
What is the seater/crimper that you use? . . .

Pat, I am simply using my Lee carbide die set with the bullet seating/crimp die. I guess my concern about your crimp is that if one overworks the brass, it can shorten the life of the case substantially. Excess crimp often will cause the mouth to split over a relatively short time, so as Rockquarry states, just do enough to secure the bullet, no more is required.
 
Carbine alright but I would not advise shooting such top end rifle powder loads out of the 629 whatsoever before figuring things out a bit more. Throw some trusted 2400 in there at mid range and see what is going on first. Can shred your hand and face only once...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top