469 v 645

rwadley1

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2018
Messages
362
Reaction score
1,068
Location
North Carolina
I have been hanging around the revolver forums for a while and am becoming interested in the early S&W semis. Recently a 469 and a 645 came across my path. I my opinion, both are nice shooter grade examples. I know they are both second generation models and that the 645 is the first model S&W did in 45 acp.

Is one more desirable than the other? What should I know about either?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210817-163710_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20210817-163710_Chrome.jpg
    111 KB · Views: 276
  • IMG_20210814_130421565.jpg
    IMG_20210814_130421565.jpg
    95.2 KB · Views: 302
Register to hide this ad
I too own a 645 and 1. it has never missed a beat and 2. shooting from a rest it shows great accuracy. In my hands unsupported...well...not so much.
Not a knock on the design but learn how to remove the firing pin. There will come a time when schmutz develops around it and its spring and will require disassembly and cleaning. But for me that was after several years of use.
 
The 469 is a double stack 9mm, and is the DA/SA type of action. It can be carried hammer down on a chambered round and safety off. Can grab and go (shoot) just like a revolver and all follow up shots are Single Action with a lighter trigger pull. It has an alloy frame and isn't too heavy to carry all day. 12 round mag's, and dubbed the "Mini" due to the compact size.

Mine has been modified into a two tone, I have never had a problem with operation or accuracy.
 
The 469 is a double stack 9mm, and is the DA/SA type of action. It can be carried hammer down on a chambered round and safety off. Can grab and go (shoot) just like a revolver and all follow up shots are Single Action with a lighter trigger pull. It has an alloy frame and isn't too heavy to carry all day. 12 round mag's, and dubbed the "Mini" due to the compact size.

Mine has been modified into a two tone, I have never had a problem with operation or accuracy.


That is one sharp looking rig!
 
I'd lean toward the 645. I'm biased toward stainless, and I see you're in N.C.
Second, there are far fewer of them in my A.O. than 9mms. Third, it's far easier to get the grips off for cleaning on the big boy. The 469 is more involved.
 
I appreciate the feedback. I expected a lot of, "buy both". Of course, that's always the right answer. We'll see what happens.
 
Desirable?

The 645 almost always commands a higher price than a 469...

In terms of collectability,, the 645 was S&W's first .45 and the 469 was their first "minigun" of the modern era.

Hence the argument for having both.

And on the bright side, owning a 645 and a 469 is less costly than owning 2 645s! ;)

John
 
If they're anything close to the same price the 645 is the better value
S&W's first .45acp semi , iconic , a proud place in your S&W collection .

As a working pistol for it's original intended purpose , the 469 .
 
1Sd1mOm.jpg


645 for sure!

I had a 669 and it was just "meh". For 9mm, the 3rd Gens are a must unless you're talking about a gun like the 639. But for a compact double stack, the 6904 smokes the 469 all week and twice on Sunday.
 
It really does depend on what you want to use them for. The 469 is hard to beat as an everyday carry gun. I carry one every day in a fanny pack. The price I saw in your photo is decent in this market, and extra mags used to be pretty easy to get.

The 645 is a bigger gun. If you were going to carry it, you would want a shoulder holster or a solid OWB holster. But for a home defense gun in a drawer, it would be great.
 
Back
Top