new Python 2.5" recoil

Joined
Aug 9, 2005
Messages
8,919
Reaction score
10,991
I've fired at least 200 rounds of handloaded .357 Magnum ammo through a new 2.5" stainless Python. This is a bulky and heavy revolver, but it's not uncomfortable to shoot with magnum ammo like all of the J-frame .357s I've had experience with. I can shoot a full box of magnum ammo with the Colt without feeling beaten.

Of course, being easier to handle helps the shooter to do much better. Worth considering if you're looking for a snubnose .357.
 
Register to hide this ad
I have shot my new 2.5” Python and 1964 example extensively. I agree that their heft is effective in attenuating recoil, making them pleasant to shoot; I can’t say the same about 357 J frames.
 

Attachments

  • AE121528-916E-41F1-B66C-9FAE0019A67E.jpg
    AE121528-916E-41F1-B66C-9FAE0019A67E.jpg
    79.2 KB · Views: 79
  • A1B57FB5-42CC-4140-8EC5-7629EB81B326.jpg
    A1B57FB5-42CC-4140-8EC5-7629EB81B326.jpg
    80.9 KB · Views: 68
Last edited:
My .357 load for the last few years is a 158 XTP a stout charge of H110 and a CCI Magnum primer.

My smallest Colt is the 3 inch. 50 rounds? No problem!

Way more accurate than you would think a 3 incher would be. I love my new Colts. I do wish the cylinder was longer so I could use my Lyman 173s.
 
My .357 load for the last few years is a 158 XTP a stout charge of H110 and a CCI Magnum primer.

My smallest Colt is the 3 inch. 50 rounds? No problem!

Way more accurate than you would think a 3 incher would be. I love my new Colts. I do wish the cylinder was longer so I could use my Lyman 173s.

I presume you're speaking of the #358429. I've used this one and the HP version #358439, but prefer the H&G #51 original .357 SWC at 160 grains. With the Lyman designs, either put a light roll crimp at max. length for your cylinder or crimp over the bullet shoulder. Both methods seem to work well and I don't recall accuracy suffering in any way. Of course with the #51, you can crimp in the crimp groove.
 
Heavier barrel, heavier cylinder, heavier frame, larger grip, so yeah, a Colt Python 2 1/2" is going to be easier on the hands than a J-frame. Try carrying that Python in your trouser pocket, that's where the beauty of the J-frame shines.
 
Heavier barrel, heavier cylinder, heavier frame, larger grip, so yeah, a Colt Python 2 1/2" is going to be easier on the hands than a J-frame. Try carrying that Python in your trouser pocket, that's where the beauty of the J-frame shines.

I like the J-frames, too - in .38 Special. Nothing better for concealed carry though some would disagree. I mentioned the Python only because some like to shoot and carry larger revolvers. I only shoot them, no longer carry.
 
Your premise was entirely wrong from opposite angles. You don't buy a 2.5" revolver for the purpose of shooting full house .357 loads on a regular basis. And, you shouldn't buy a steel .357 revolver and expect the weight of a j-frame. Just get a j-frame!
 
Your premise was entirely wrong from opposite angles. You don't buy a 2.5" revolver for the purpose of shooting full house .357 loads on a regular basis. And, you shouldn't buy a steel .357 revolver and expect the weight of a j-frame. Just get a j-frame!

Your interpretation of the the premise read a lot into the general comments I made, but no point in arguing.
 
My .357 load for the last few years is a 158 XTP a stout charge of H110 and a CCI Magnum primer.

My smallest Colt is the 3 inch. 50 rounds? No problem!

Way more accurate than you would think a 3 incher would be. I love my new Colts. I do wish the cylinder was longer so I could use my Lyman 173s.

Crimp on the edger of the front shoulder.....I do.......So they work in my Python and 27's.
 
I've fired at least 200 rounds of handloaded .357 Magnum ammo through a new 2.5" stainless Python. This is a bulky and heavy revolver, but it's not uncomfortable to shoot with magnum ammo like all of the J-frame .357s I've had experience with. I can shoot a full box of magnum ammo with the Colt without feeling beaten.

Of course, being easier to handle helps the shooter to do much better. Worth considering if you're looking for a snubnose .357.
I am looking for one, but waiting for a 2 1/2” BLUED Colt Python to drop! I got a 3” Stainless already.
Larry
 
The length of the python cylinder will work with the 173 gr swc . I recently got acquainted with a forum member that trained Law Enforcement officer , police in Mexico city and Rurales in Guadalajara . They all , at that time used 4" Colt Pythons . They loaded the cast bullet in a 38 special case on top of 13.5 grs / 2400 . The Keith load . The mold they used was the MP mold that would hollow point the bullet . They also powder coated . He sent me pictures of training there . I had to have the MP mold and tried that combo in my Pythons . It's a winner for sure . I also tried 12.0 grs / 2400 to more or less duplicate the 38/44 load . Both shot extremely well . So yes , you can shoot the Keith swc in a python . Regards Paul
 
So far, I have just the new blued 4 inch Python. I would be interested in a 3 inch blued Python if offered. Love my 3 inch 686-6+.



Very nice, but I still cannot wrap my head around the concept of a Colt Python with three slots in a 4 or 4.25" barrel.
 
[Very nice, but I still cannot wrap my head around the concept of a Colt Python with three slots in a 4 or 4.25" barrel.[/QUOTE]

It's what consumer advocate John Stossel has called "the incredible shrinking package" for years: less product (the add'l metal cut out from the bbl rib) for the same, or more $. I still haven't recovered from Hebrew National going from 7 to 6 franks in the package.:(

Kaaskop49
Shield #5103

P.S. Just checked my 2020 version 4.25" Python: 2 cutouts in the bbl rib. Eat your heart out, America!:)
 
Back
Top