First year pre 29

Joined
Dec 15, 2022
Messages
236
Reaction score
543
Location
SE Al.
Pictures of my newly acquired pre 29". I had a nice 4" black case that I'd bought in hopes of finding the right revolver. I didn't realize these older blued guns are as hard to photograph as nickel guns but I don't pretend to be a photographer. The informative letter is attached as well. We are very fortunate to be able to get this type information.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5248.jpeg
    IMG_5248.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 2
  • IMG_5247.jpeg
    IMG_5247.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
  • IMG_5181.jpeg
    IMG_5181.jpeg
    2 MB · Views: 5
Register to hide this ad
... I didn't realize these older blued guns are as hard to photograph as nickel guns but I don't pretend to be a photographer...
Photographing a dark subject on a white background causes the subject to be underexposed because camera's exposure meter 'sees' and exposes for the white background. There are a couple ways to get better results. Easiest way is to use a darker background. You could also use exposure compensation of maybe +2. I personally avoid using any kind of direct lighting for my gun photos.

Here's a sample of a blued gun on a dark background with only indirect light from a nearby window.

627581-1aee6b9204ec5e8abfaee59db1dcd0a8.data
 
Last edited:
Few things in life bring such pleasure as a four inch five screw 44 Magnum!
Just added your serial to my growing four inch 44 database.

There are several interesting things about the early four inch 44 Mags that make them very unique as well as the timing of their introduction especially when putting it in comparison to the other big new SW model introduced just around the same time being the Combat Magnum.
Both early examples have the 6 groove tangs, unfortunately no 5 screw Combat Magnum exists because it was introduced as a 4 screw in early 1956 where the four inch 44 was introduced as a 5 screw and (except for two in my notes ) really began to ship out months later in Dec 56.
Another interesting tidbit is that while there were under 1800 six groove Combat Magnums prior to the 10 groove change the number of 6 groove four inch .44 Magnums is less than half that.

One other oddity is that the 44 Mag was introduced as a 6.5" initially then as a 4" afterwards where the Combat Magnum was introduced as a 4" and a 6" didnt appear until some (7 or 8 ?) Years later, probably because the CM was intended as a duty weapon where the 44 was likely intended for hunting and field use.

On a side note there was a post recently about a custom ordered four inch .44 Special that was built right around the time the .44 Magnum was being produced which makes a great comparison, heres a link if interested:

 
Last edited:
RT44nut - that is one fine looking pre-29. I hope you don't mind, I took the liberty to run one of your photos thru some adjustment to better highlight the gun.

Larry

View attachment 784685
Wow! I see one of your abilities. Looks great. I tried a half dozen of the recommendations yesterday with different backgrounds and still had poor results. Some people have it, the rest of us don't.
 
Congratulations on completing your search. That is certainly one of the most gorgeous stock revolvers I've ever seen! A photo of the completed package would be cool to see. Thanks for sharing your magnificent pre-29.
 
Ok, if we're going to show other first year 4 inch 44 Magnums I'll show this one too and tell the story. Probably told it here before but years ago. I stop by a small LGS which I've visited before and have rarely seen anything S&W and don't see any on the shelves this time either. The owner wants to know if he can show me anything and I say something to the effect that he could show me some old S&Ws if he had any but the shelves are barren. He says, yeah, sorry don't get many of those. I'm turning to leave and he says "ah, wait a minute, I just bought some guns and I think there is a S&W."

So on the concrete floor behind the counter is a "pile" of well used shotguns, a "customized" Arisaka, a few old 22 rifles and this 44 Magnum. Which turned out to be shipped in November of 1956 to a hardware store in Amarillo.

IMG_1010.jpeg
 
Pictures of my newly acquired pre 29". I had a nice 4" black case that I'd bought in hopes of finding the right revolver. I didn't realize these older blued guns are as hard to photograph as nickel guns but I don't pretend to be a photographer. The informative letter is attached as well. We are very fortunate to be able to get this type information.
Very very nice .44. mine is later but still a joy to shoot.
 
Pictures of my newly acquired pre 29". I had a nice 4" black case that I'd bought in hopes of finding the right revolver. I didn't realize these older blued guns are as hard to photograph as nickel guns but I don't pretend to be a photographer. The informative letter is attached as well. We are very fortunate to be able to get this type information.
You seem to be having a bit of good fortune with S&W products lately Randy. Keep doing what ever it is your doing!!!
(feel free to pass on your secret to me if you will) lol Still looking for that 6.5 Nickel M-24
Rick
 
On the photos, just a suggestion - take it outside on a semi cloudy or overcast day or a shaded area and put the gun on a non-reflective surface, put the phone in camera mode, touch the screen where you want to focus and shoot. This is from my back yard a few minutes ago. The top pic is in a shaded patio, the bottom one in direct filtered sunlight. I think this gives a decent amount of detail without requiring a studio or special lighting.

Colt 45 2.jpg

Colt .45.jpg
 
I don't have one of them, but I do have its Model 57 cousin. Re: taking pictures, I take most of them on this bench in the afternoon after it's not in direct sunlight. The blue in the sky highlights the bluing very well, and you can even see the line of green hills & mountains on the cylinder. And the plainness of the wood on the bench makes quality stocks really stand out. I usually use an old 2007-spec Nikon DSLR.

pQi08rJ.jpg


JoH2hSg.jpg
 
Back
Top