Model 27 - 5" or 6"

Register to hide this ad
If you're just buying one to shoot, the 6" models are much more available and much cheaper. Both are great. 5" models are more desired by collectors.
 
I have 5", 6" and 8-3/8" M27s. For sheer shootability/accuracy, the longer the barrel the better. On the other hand, the 5" has great handling characteristics, rides well in a belt holster, and as far as I'm concerned, is among the best looking revolvers ever made.
IMG_5138.jpeg
 
I have owned one 6", three 5" and a 4". I ended up never firing the 5" because they were to collectable new in the box. I shot the hell out of my 6" used it for bullseye for years. The 4" I bought used and is a great packing pistol. I sold my 6" and all the 5" kept the 4" because it fit my needs best. Should I ever find a used 5" at a good price I might be tempted. Till then I am happy with what I have. If I was only doing fun at the range my 6" was perfect. Very accurate (better then Pythons I sold after ransom rest competition).
 
Looking at a few pre-lock 27's, the 5" seems to demand a higher price. Are they that much rarer? What would you buy. Just for fun at the range.
I tend to like 5" but that might be just me - I have 5" S&Ws in .38 Spl., .357 Mag, .44 Mag, .45 Auto-rim and .45 Colt.
S&W 5in 27 165 GT at 25 yds.webp

I had a 6" M-28 but I never fired it - I ditched the barrel and converted it to a .45 Colt/.45 Auto-rim (two different cylinders).

But I like other barrel lentghs as well :) I have a 6.5" Triple lock made in 1912 that thinks it is a rifle! and a 1950 target that isn't quite as accurate but adequate.

S&W 44 spl Triple Lock 1912 and Pre-24 - compressed.webp


Riposte
 
For range shooting it realy doesn't matter ...
If you ever plan to carry it in a holster ... 5" is a bit easier to carry .
I just like the looks and balance when shooting of the 5" bbl model 27 ...
5" would be my pick !
Gary
 
Back
Top