.38 Special Ammo Velocity Comparisons: Historical vs. Modern

Dump1567

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2003
Messages
2,536
Reaction score
5,215
Location
AZ
This has been brought up over the years that today's +P .38 Spl. ammo is at the same velocity that older ammo has always been loaded at. Based on what GROK AI has to say on the subject, it sounds like this is true.

Yes, there is substantial evidence from historical catalogs, reloading manuals, and ballistics discussions that .38 Special ammunition from the 1920s to the 1960s was often loaded to higher pressures—equivalent to or exceeding modern .38 Special +P levels (20,000 PSI per current SAAMI standards)—resulting in higher velocities than today's standard-pressure .38 Special loads (limited to 17,000 PSI). This shift occurred around the early 1970s when SAAMI formalized lower pressure standards for standard .38 Special to improve safety in lighter revolvers and reduce liability, while designating +P for hotter loads. Pre-1972 loads weren't always explicitly rated in PSI (often measured in Copper Units of Pressure, or CUP, with equivalents around 18,500–20,000 CUP for what became +P), but velocity data serves as a proxy for pressure, as higher velocities indicate higher pressures in comparable test setups.

Below, I'll summarize the key historical context and provide direct velocity comparisons based on reliable sources, including old catalogs, chronographed tests of vintage ammo, and modern benchmarks. Velocities are typically reported from 4-inch or 6-inch barrels (common for testing), as barrel length affects results by ~50–100 fps per inch. Bullet weights focus on the common 158-grain lead round nose (LRN) or similar, as it's the standard for comparisons.

Historical Context

1920s–1930s: .38 Special was developed in 1898 as a higher-velocity upgrade over the .38 Long Colt, with early loads pushing 100–150 fps faster. By the late 1920s, law enforcement demands led to "high-speed" variants like the .38 Super Police (200-grain bullet) and .38/44 Hi-Speed (158-grain at ~1,100 fps from a 5-inch barrel, ~20,000 PSI). These were not +P by name but operated at pressures now considered +P.

1940s–1960s: Military and police loads varied. WWII-era loads (e.g., 158-grain FMJ) hit 850 fps from 4-inch barrels. Post-war, standard commercial loads remained hot, with U.S. Air Force M41 (130-grain FMJ, 16,000 PSI) at 750 fps from 4-inch and 950 fps from 6-inch. Experimental +P-like loads in the 1950s–1960s reached 18,500 CUP (~20,000 PSI today). Vintage ammo tests show velocities aligning with modern +P.

1970s Shift: In 1972, SAAMI standardized standard .38 Special at lower pressures (now 17,000 PSI) to accommodate alloy-frame revolvers, while +P (20,000 PSI) preserved the hotter pre-1972 performance. The FBI Load (158-grain LSWCHP +P) was introduced in 1972 as a response to underperformance of the milder standard loads. Pre-1972 "standard" ammo was often equivalent to modern +P, with no formal distinction.

Velocity Comparisons: Historical vs. Modern

Velocities are approximate averages; actual results vary by barrel length, ammo brand, and testing conditions. Modern data is from SAAMI reference specs (vented test barrels simulate revolvers) and manufacturer catalogs (e.g., Federal, Remington). Historical data comes from catalogs, reloading manuals, and chronographed vintage ammo.

158-Grain Bullet (Most Common for Comparisons)

Historical (1920s–1960s):

• 1940 Catalog (standard load): 960 fps (test barrel not specified, likely 6-inch or vented).

• 1950s Peters LRN: 800 fps from 4-inch.

• 1950s Remington Hi-Speed: 920 fps from 4-inch.

• Late 1960s Remington LRN: 840 fps from 4-inch.

• Mid-1960s Western Super-X LRN: 810 fps from 4-inch.

• 1958 Lyman Manual (standard load): 825–972 fps (various powders, 4-inch assumed).

• Typical 1940s–1960s police/service: 800–840 fps from 4-inch, 700 fps from 2-inch.

Modern Standard-Pressure (17,000 PSI):

• SAAMI Reference: 750 fps (test barrel), 900 fps (vented barrel).

• Federal/Remington LRN: 730–800 fps from 4-inch, 700–750 fps from 2-inch.

Comparison: 50–200 fps slower than 1940s–1960s equivalents, reflecting lower pressure.

Modern +P (20,000 PSI):

• SAAMI Reference: 880 fps (test barrel), 1,050 fps (vented barrel).

• Federal/Remington LSWCHP or JHP: 850–950 fps from 4-inch, 785–825 fps from 2-inch.

Comparison: Matches or slightly exceeds pre-1972 velocities (e.g., 920–960 fps historical highs align with modern +P).

Other Bullet Weights (Examples)

130-Grain:

• Historical (1960s M41 Military): 750 fps from 4-inch, 950 fps from 6-inch (16,000 PSI).

• Modern Standard: 775–895 fps (test barrel).

• Modern +P: 925 fps (test barrel), 1,150 fps (vented).

110-Grain:

• Historical (1930s Hi-Speed): ~1,100–1,390 fps (high-pressure variants).

• Modern Standard: 945–1,000 fps (test barrel).

• Modern +P: 980 fps (test barrel), 1,075–1,205 fps (vented).

Key Takeaways

• Pre-1972 .38 Special was indeed "hotter," often at +P-equivalent pressures, delivering velocities 100–200 fps higher than today's standard loads for the same bullet weight and barrel length. This made it more effective for penetration and stopping power but harder on lighter guns.

• Modern +P restores that performance but is labeled for use only in +P-rated revolvers to avoid damage.

• Sources like vintage catalogs (e.g., 1940 Remington) and manuals (e.g., 1958 Lyman) provide the most direct data, while chronographed tests of surviving ammo confirm the trend. Note that exact pressures pre-1972 weren't always documented in PSI, and CUP-to-PSI conversions aren't linear (e.g., 18,500 CUP ≈ 20,000 PSI for .38 Special). If you have a specific load or barrel length in mind, I can refine the comparison!
 
Register to hide this ad
We're there really 110 grain loads in the 1930s?

Per Wikipedia, I guess so. Part of the .38/44 loads which lead to the .357 mag development.

Developed in response to requests from law enforcement agencies for a handgun bullet that could penetrate auto bodies and body armor.

The 38/44 high-speed cartridge came in three bullet weights: 158 grains (10.2 g), 150 grains (9.7 g), and 110 grains (7.1 g), with either coated lead or steel jacket, metal-piercing bullets.
 
Per Wikipedia, I guess so. Part of the .38/44 loads which lead to the .357 mag development.

Developed in response to requests from law enforcement agencies for a handgun bullet that could penetrate auto bodies and body armor.

The 38/44 high-speed cartridge came in three bullet weights: 158 grains (10.2 g), 150 grains (9.7 g), and 110 grains (7.1 g), with either coated lead or steel jacket, metal-piercing bullets.
Thank you; I had no idea such light bullets were available in the 1930s.
 
Harry Hampton, Executive Director, Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute (SAAMI)

+ P HEADSTAMP

''For velocity reasons, certain .38 Special center-fire revolver and pistol cartridges have been loaded to two acceptable pressure levels for many years.

''Recent recommendations of some firearms manufacturers state that the higher pressure cartridges should be used in certain models only.

''In order that cartridge cases loaded to the higher pressure level can be identified by anyone both before and after firing, the members of SAAMI have recently adopted the practice of adding a +P to the headstamp of the cartridge cases. An appropriate explanation is furnished on the factory-packed box.

''This practice has been adopted without obsolescence of existing stocks.''

JULY 1974
 
The Winchester Q4030 158 grain LHP was made for the St. Louis, MO police in 1968. AKA Chicago and FBI load. Commercial code W38SPD for St. Louis Police Department.

The 130 grain FMJ military .38 Special was developed by Remington in 1948 with formal adoption as the M41 in 1953, predating the adoption of the aluminum cylinder M13 by Colt and S&W.

950 spec velocity in solid test barrel, but 750 real world, as noted. Because of bullet in bore obstructions from the low velocity, use was not recommended in barrels longer than 4 inches, per C.E. Harris.

Article on this coming soon at Revolverguy.

TM 43-0001-27 1994
CARTRIDGE, CALIBER .38, BALL, SPECIAL, M41
Performance:
Chamber pressure.............................. 16,000 psi
Velocity .............................................. 950 fps, 15 ft from muzzle (non-vented 6 inch.)
 

Attachments

  • Winchester .38 Spl WSPD box 8 oblique.webp
    Winchester .38 Spl WSPD box 8 oblique.webp
    37.3 KB · Views: 0
When I shot +Ps around 1980 there was a marked difference from standard loads. People even commented on their way out from the range, "You can tell he's shooting +Ps now." I also have a 1970 Sierra manual that gives 7 grains of Unique for a 125 gr jacketed bullet where today 6 grains is considered to be max. My guns are modern/strong weapons and I don't pay any attention to that 'old loads were too hot' stuff. If it didn't blow up guns in the past there's no reason to think they will do so today. Having said that, I don't do hot loads nearly as much as I used to. I just enjoy shooting milder loads these days. I also prefer standard loads for in home SD.
 
Just for some modern context, current production (since they restarted production) R-P .38 Special standard pressure 158-grain LSWC went 804 fps from my 4" Official Police, and the +P 158-grain LSWCHP went 840 fps from my 3" 64-6 and 860 fps from my 4" 10-8.

I always take the old catalogs' velocity figures with a grain of salt because they rarely specified the barrel length and whether it was vented.
 
Not entirely sure what I think of this but it sounds right based on some of the old load books and writings. I have Col Townsend Whelen's 1957 book and it shows for Standard Target and Light Loads 3.5 gr Bullseye under a 173 grain bullet. Using the Lee book which is an amalgamation of loads from other company's publications I see a 160 grain jacketed bullet over 3.5 and 158 grain lead over 3.6 grains of the same designation powder. (Obviously newer and different lot, etc.).
He also has a listing of Heavy Loads for Heavy Frame Revolvers Only which I take to mean in those days the S&W Heavy Duty, Colt SAA and New Service guns. Not really what we are talking about here.
Ken Waters in his 1966 Pet Loads (early versions which were rather vague and not as data-rich as his superb later work) does cite 20,000 psi as "established maximum pressure level for this cartridge" but notes that Speer limited their book to 18,000 then.
I do not believe the .38 Super Police (200-grain bullet) was originally loaded to heavier-than-normal velocities (whatever "normal" would have been) or let's say heavier than standard pressures. Waters says that it was first set up for 671 fps from a 6" bbl and 623 fps from a 2", later being increased to 730 fps. Concurring and pulled from a different site which fits my own understanding as well we have "1968 edition of Gun Digest lists the velocity of the 200 grain Super Police load at 730 fps as compared with 855 fps for the 158 grain lead round nose. At that time most factory velocities were taken from six-inch, unvented barrels so actual velocities from a revolver were probably lower."
I have the Lyman 200 mold and have shot it pretty extensively in handloads using available data and a little bit in the kill corral from 2" to 4" bbls. Assuming 6" unvented factory bbls we would likely see this load running along in the upper 600's fps from 4"-6" bbls which is what most of my loads clocked. In 2" my loads using various book data went in the upper 500's! I do not recall ever getting velocities at or in excess of "book" with any load I used.
I tend to doubt that the 200 Super Police load ever hit 730 from a 6" revolver.
BTW, the big problem and for most wheelguns I've used it in is a big problem is its POI. It shoots way up there over the mountain in just about every gun I've shot it in! I have not wrung it out in adjustable sighted wheelguns but I suspect there are a lot of K-frame types (M14, 15, etc) that may lack enough travel to get the thing to shoot to the sights. I've a 28-2 I keep meaning to cast some for and run it hot in .357 but that is a thread drift into the high weeds so I'll quit now.
 
Harry Hampton, Executive Director, Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute (SAAMI)

+ P HEADSTAMP

''For velocity reasons, certain .38 Special center-fire revolver and pistol cartridges have been loaded to two acceptable pressure levels for many years.

''Recent recommendations of some firearms manufacturers state that the higher pressure cartridges should be used in certain models only.

''In order that cartridge cases loaded to the higher pressure level can be identified by anyone both before and after firing, the members of SAAMI have recently adopted the practice of adding a +P to the headstamp of the cartridge cases. An appropriate explanation is furnished on the factory-packed box.

''This practice has been adopted without obsolescence of existing stocks.''

JULY 1974
This is the first recent post I've seen that makes note of +P headstamps. I ran across about 200 cases at at a gun show with those headstamps. I reserve those for all my +P loads that I create and I do notice less csae expansion but then, I do load to a conservative 900-950 fps in those for my 3".
Thanks for the note.
 
Before affordable chronographs became widely available and people started sharing measured velocities out of real guns ammo makers were often very optimistic with velocity ratings. Ballistic pendulum chronographs were not something the shooting public was going to mess with. And until the internet, particularly YouTube, made it easy to share results the gun magazines were so dependent on advertising they tended avoid reporting exaggerated velocities, downplay the results or make excuses for them.

I think lower velocity ratings are the result of a combination of lower pressure and more accurate ratings. Without having access to a lot of old ammo its hard to tell which is more responsible. Probably varies on the cartridge too. When a company was trying to sell a new super high velocity cartridge they had a lot more incentive to exaggerate.
 
This has been brought up over the years that today's +P .38 Spl. ammo is at the same velocity that older ammo has always been loaded at. Based on what GROK AI has to say on the subject, it sounds like this is true.

Yes, there is substantial evidence from historical catalogs, reloading manuals, and ballistics discussions that .38 Special ammunition from the 1920s to the 1960s was often loaded to higher pressures—equivalent to or exceeding modern .38 Special +P levels (20,000 PSI per current SAAMI standards)—resulting in higher velocities than today's standard-pressure .38 Special loads (limited to 17,000 PSI). This shift occurred around the early 1970s when SAAMI formalized lower pressure standards for standard .38 Special to improve safety in lighter revolvers and reduce liability, while designating +P for hotter loads. Pre-1972 loads weren't always explicitly rated in PSI (often measured in Copper Units of Pressure, or CUP, with equivalents around 18,500–20,000 CUP for what became +P), but velocity data serves as a proxy for pressure, as higher velocities indicate higher pressures in comparable test setups.

Below, I'll summarize the key historical context and provide direct velocity comparisons based on reliable sources, including old catalogs, chronographed tests of vintage ammo, and modern benchmarks. Velocities are typically reported from 4-inch or 6-inch barrels (common for testing), as barrel length affects results by ~50–100 fps per inch. Bullet weights focus on the common 158-grain lead round nose (LRN) or similar, as it's the standard for comparisons.

Historical Context

1920s–1930s: .38 Special was developed in 1898 as a higher-velocity upgrade over the .38 Long Colt, with early loads pushing 100–150 fps faster. By the late 1920s, law enforcement demands led to "high-speed" variants like the .38 Super Police (200-grain bullet) and .38/44 Hi-Speed (158-grain at ~1,100 fps from a 5-inch barrel, ~20,000 PSI). These were not +P by name but operated at pressures now considered +P.

1940s–1960s: Military and police loads varied. WWII-era loads (e.g., 158-grain FMJ) hit 850 fps from 4-inch barrels. Post-war, standard commercial loads remained hot, with U.S. Air Force M41 (130-grain FMJ, 16,000 PSI) at 750 fps from 4-inch and 950 fps from 6-inch. Experimental +P-like loads in the 1950s–1960s reached 18,500 CUP (~20,000 PSI today). Vintage ammo tests show velocities aligning with modern +P.

1970s Shift: In 1972, SAAMI standardized standard .38 Special at lower pressures (now 17,000 PSI) to accommodate alloy-frame revolvers, while +P (20,000 PSI) preserved the hotter pre-1972 performance. The FBI Load (158-grain LSWCHP +P) was introduced in 1972 as a response to underperformance of the milder standard loads. Pre-1972 "standard" ammo was often equivalent to modern +P, with no formal distinction.

Velocity Comparisons: Historical vs. Modern

Velocities are approximate averages; actual results vary by barrel length, ammo brand, and testing conditions. Modern data is from SAAMI reference specs (vented test barrels simulate revolvers) and manufacturer catalogs (e.g., Federal, Remington). Historical data comes from catalogs, reloading manuals, and chronographed vintage ammo.

158-Grain Bullet (Most Common for Comparisons)

Historical (1920s–1960s):

• 1940 Catalog (standard load): 960 fps (test barrel not specified, likely 6-inch or vented).

• 1950s Peters LRN: 800 fps from 4-inch.

• 1950s Remington Hi-Speed: 920 fps from 4-inch.

• Late 1960s Remington LRN: 840 fps from 4-inch.

• Mid-1960s Western Super-X LRN: 810 fps from 4-inch.

• 1958 Lyman Manual (standard load): 825–972 fps (various powders, 4-inch assumed).

• Typical 1940s–1960s police/service: 800–840 fps from 4-inch, 700 fps from 2-inch.

Modern Standard-Pressure (17,000 PSI):

• SAAMI Reference: 750 fps (test barrel), 900 fps (vented barrel).

• Federal/Remington LRN: 730–800 fps from 4-inch, 700–750 fps from 2-inch.

Comparison: 50–200 fps slower than 1940s–1960s equivalents, reflecting lower pressure.

Modern +P (20,000 PSI):

• SAAMI Reference: 880 fps (test barrel), 1,050 fps (vented barrel).

• Federal/Remington LSWCHP or JHP: 850–950 fps from 4-inch, 785–825 fps from 2-inch.

Comparison: Matches or slightly exceeds pre-1972 velocities (e.g., 920–960 fps historical highs align with modern +P).

Other Bullet Weights (Examples)

130-Grain:

• Historical (1960s M41 Military): 750 fps from 4-inch, 950 fps from 6-inch (16,000 PSI).

• Modern Standard: 775–895 fps (test barrel).

• Modern +P: 925 fps (test barrel), 1,150 fps (vented).

110-Grain:

• Historical (1930s Hi-Speed): ~1,100–1,390 fps (high-pressure variants).

• Modern Standard: 945–1,000 fps (test barrel).

• Modern +P: 980 fps (test barrel), 1,075–1,205 fps (vented).

Key Takeaways

• Pre-1972 .38 Special was indeed "hotter," often at +P-equivalent pressures, delivering velocities 100–200 fps higher than today's standard loads for the same bullet weight and barrel length. This made it more effective for penetration and stopping power but harder on lighter guns.

• Modern +P restores that performance but is labeled for use only in +P-rated revolvers to avoid damage.

• Sources like vintage catalogs (e.g., 1940 Remington) and manuals (e.g., 1958 Lyman) provide the most direct data, while chronographed tests of surviving ammo confirm the trend. Note that exact pressures pre-1972 weren't always documented in PSI, and CUP-to-PSI conversions aren't linear (e.g., 18,500 CUP ≈ 20,000 PSI for .38 Special). If you have a specific load or barrel length in mind, I can refine the comparison!
And not just 38...SAAMI tuned them all lower. I recall visiting the Mother ship back in the late 80's when Gaston was courting LE business...we were shown the infamous concrete bunker where all outgoing platforms were test fired before shipping...standard 9mm load was a European 9mil sub machine gun round as it was the only one with high enough pressure to suit Glock. I think it had a black tip as I recall...it was quite snappy.
 
I have several different vintages of reloading manuals. One manual I sort of stray away from using is the Lee manual. In comparing different loads for different calibers I see some numbers that make me a bit nervous to load and fire described in Mr. Lee's book.

Like one of the others commented, I now like to shoot lighter less-recoil-intense loads now that I am retired and just shooting for fun and to retain my skills.
 
I have several different vintages of reloading manuals. One manual I sort of stray away from using is the Lee manual. In comparing different loads for different calibers I see some numbers that make me a bit nervous to load and fire described in Mr. Lee's book.

Like one of the others commented, I now like to shoot lighter less-recoil-intense loads now that I am retired and just shooting for fun and to retain my skills.

One other load I was always puzzled about is the .38 Super-Vel. I have a box here somewhere, but can't located it as I write this. Anyone know what the selling-point was of it? Obviously it was aclaimed to be "faster."
 
I have several different vintages of reloading manuals. One manual I sort of stray away from using is the Lee manual. In comparing different loads for different calibers I see some numbers that make me a bit nervous to load and fire described in Mr. Lee's book.

Like one of the others commented, I now like to shoot lighter less-recoil-intense loads now that I am retired and just shooting for fun and to retain my skills.
There's more to the Lee manual... I haven't referred to it in a while; there may be some wild loads in there but I don't recall any offhand. While the Lee book is a good reference manual used in conjunction with other manuals for comparison purposes, I wouldn't rely on it as my sole manual. Components other than powder are often not identified and the source of data is not disclosed either, even though it likely comes from reputable publications rather than questionable Internet origins.
 
I think I've learned a lot in this thread about our beloved .38 Special. Never knew there was a 110 grain load in the '30s. I remember when "vented" started appearing in the manufacturer handgun cartridge literature. Vented vs. unvented makes quite a bit of difference in velocity. I still believe much of the previous data was likely achieved in unvented barrels.

I suspect some of Buffalo Bore and Underwood's .38+P offerings are about what the 1930s 38-44 ammunition was. Underwood 158 +P SWC did about 1200 FPS in one of my 4" revolvers...
 
I have several different vintages of reloading manuals. One manual I sort of stray away from using is the Lee manual. In comparing different loads for different calibers I see some numbers that make me a bit nervous to load and fire described in Mr. Lee's book.

Like one of the others commented, I now like to shoot lighter less-recoil-intense loads now that I am retired and just shooting for fun and to retain my skills.

One other load I was always puzzled about is the .38 Super-Vel. I have a box here somewhere, but can't located it as I write this. Anyone know what the selling-point was of it? Obviously it was aclaimed to be "faster."
RE: Lee, I believe as noted above that it is merely a compilation of data pulled from other sources, not attributed and with not all the data involved cited.
If that is correct, it is for sure an odd source.
 
Back
Top