Aren't those two revolvers service sighted 1917s that were taken from inventory at the factory and then S&W put target sights on them to fill the special orders for those two gentlemen?
Ed
How in the world would one ever know that ? As far as I know, and perhaps as far as you know, there
is nothing in any of the records to suggest that this might have occured . I don't think there is
any basis, in fact, for such an assertion.
First of all, the barrel forgings are the same, irregardless of how the front sight is eventually
configured. Target-sighted barrels are simply fixed-sighted barrels with additional milling.
Second, the frame forgings are identical, as well. At some point in the manufacturing process,
different machining operations are performed, depending on whether the frame is to be target or
fixed rear sights. There are known examples of fixed-sighted frames that went back to the factory
for adjustable rear sights; they all seem to have a remanent of the original fixed sight trough.
It was a bit deeper than the cut for a rear-sight assembly.
Third, the first of those two guns was shipped in 1918. And is categorized as a 1917. What could
have possibly expired within one year ?!
I can tell you that neither of these two guns have any remanent of a deeper fixed-sight trough.
I recently acquired what I believe is the first K-32. Its a 4" target K-frame chambered in 32 long,
and roll-marked that way on the barrel. Of course, its letters this way, as well. It was shipped
in Sept, 1910. ( I'm defining K-32 as a target-sighted 32 Long K-frame ). Clearly it was a
special order - but nothing that the factory was not already doing, in bits and pieces, on other
guns. 32 Long was a common chambering , and target sights were readily available.
You are not going to suggest that this not really a K-32, just because it wasn't something that
was cataloged ? Or, at the limit, are you going to suggest that any special-ordered gun is not
really what the factory says it was ?
Regards, Mike Priwer