Russian Shovel Comparison: Cold Steel vs. Original

JayFramer

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
4,596
Reaction score
9,334
Hello all! :)

The following is a comparison of an original 1984 dated Soviet entrenching tool, and the Cold Steel Special Forces Shovel. This style of shovel has been used for decades by the Russian military, and takes the form of a short symmetrical shovel with a fixed blade attached to a wooden handle. They are an extremely useful piece of kit, not only usable in the primary role as an entrenching tool, but also capable of being a ferocious hand to hand melee weapon.

Let's look at these two designs sheathed, and discuss the sheaths:

20160324_154727.jpg


The Cold Steel version comes with a simple nylon sheath that is thick and strong, securing the shovel with two nylon straps that go over the shoulders of the shovel, held by snaps. It hols the shovel very well, and the shovel fits snugly inside. The edges are riveted and heavily built. A belt loop is attached at the bottom of the sheath.

The Russian variant in made from the typical greenish brown canvas that has been used for many years. A small black leather strap with buckle secures the shovel. The strap has three holes, and a metal retaining ring for the slack. The mouth of the sheath is reinforced with extra canvas. The Russian sheath has two belt loops made of heavy cotton webbing.

Of the two sheaths, both are very serviceable. I prefer the closure method of the Cold Steel variant but prefer the placement of the belt loops on the Russian sheath.

Now, let's check out the shovels themselves (front and back):

20160324_154949.jpg


20160324_155037.jpg


Cold Steel's shovel (unsheathed) measures in at a total length of 20.5"/52cm. The width at the widest point of the blade is just under 6"/15cm. The blade is sharpened from the factory and has quite a sharp edge, and is painted glossy black. The thickness of the blade is .082"/2mm. The handle is some kind of hardwood, with a straight even grain. It is 16"/40.6cm long and attaches to the blade with two large flat head Phillips wood screws. The handle is finished with what appears to be clear polyurethane, and has a swell near the bottom. Replacement handles are available if needed.

The original 1984 dated Soviet shovel (unsheathed) measures in at a total length of 20.25"/51.4cm, just under the Cold Steel shovel. The width of the blade at it's widest point measures just under 6"/15cm, identical to Cold Steel. The Russian blade is not sharpened and is painted matte black. The thickness of the blade is also right at .082"/2mm, identical to Cold Steel's product. It should be noted than in it's advertising, Cold Steel claims there blade is "twice as thick" as an original Russian variant, which may be true of some production runs but not this 1984 dated one. The handle is 15.275"/39mm long. made of an unknown wood, perhaps teak, and seems to be oil stained. It uses smaller wood screws to attach to the blade. Also, the swell at the bottom of the handle is more pronounced than Cold Steel's.

Compared, both shovels seem to be of the same weight and balance the same in the hand. I prefer the feel of the handle on the Russian variant. It is rougher, and the swell near the bottom of the handle allows for a more positive grip. The slick polyurethane on the Cold Steel shovel doesn't offer as good of a grip but it's not bad. The Cold Steel does have the benefit of a factory-sharpened blade that is quite good, but will chip and dent if abused on something other than wood and dirt (guilty as charged :o). It makes chopping and cutting tasks much easier as you can imagine, and is beneficial for defensive use.

Really, you can't go wrong with either of these great shovels. The Cold Steel shovel can be had for less than $20 USD without the sheath. With the sheath, expect to pay as little as $25 if you shop around. Original Russian issue shovels are more expensive, but still affordable. eBay is a great source and you can get unissued examples in the $50-$60 range or even quite a bit less if you catch a deal. If think it's worth it for the collector's value and "cool factor", but as a used the Cold Steel is every bit as good.

Both of these shovels are extremely well constructed, and are incredibly tough. This design is very practical, both as a tool and a weapon. They are useful for everything from chopping down small trees and clearing light brush, digging yourself a slit trench, to defending yourself from attack. They are ideal to throw in the trunk or in a backpack. If you don't own one of these, I highly recommend getting one.

Thanks all! :D
 
Those look really sturdy, but what happened to the one that could fold up completely or with the blade folded halfway down???

I have used them in the Air Force. They are heavier than these Russian shovels and don't feel as sturdy. I would trade my issued E-tool for one of these in a heartbeat, and in fact have carried the Cold Steel shovel during field exercises.
 
Last edited:
Interesting review. Having spent a good amount of my life with one of these tools in my hands, I became an aficionado of these highly misunderstood tools. I often will mingle around the shovel section of a store to watch what people are buying and why. These tools are in everyone's garage and almost universally misunderstood. The review was well done with great facts with one exception. The reviewed tools are not shovels. They are spades, two entirely different tools with two entirely different jobs. In fact the armies of the world call them correctly "entrenching tools". Do not look too confused, I will explain. The difference are, a shovel is made to transfer material and a spade is made for digging. Most but not all shovels have the "ames bend" which is a bend to make the lifting of material easier on the back and allowing close ground work without skinning the knuckles. A shovel can have any shape of point but has a taco shaped sides to keep material to be moved contained. A spade has a straight handle to blade profile like shown. It also has very minor edge bends. A spade should be built stout as it is often used to pry rocks and roots from the ground as well as break up compacted soil. A shovel can and should have a lightweight blade and handle as the job it is to do is to simply transfer loose material and the operator does not need the extra weight of a heavy shovel along with a heavy load. There has been a movement to make a combo tool with both advantages but like all things built for multiple purposes, it does nothing well.

Now back to original subject. I have never used the Russian entrenching tool, but I have used most US military versions from the WW 1 and 2 models as well as the Korean styles and the current E tool. I much prefer the WW 2 folding US tool for work. The Russian model appears to be quite a bit stouter for rough digging than the US model. I have seen several US models broken at the socket. But I do not abuse my tools and much prefer the changeable positioning ability of the US model that the Russian does not have. As for using one in a automobile as a emergency rescue tool, there is no good answer. I have spent decades digging out equipment stuck in either snow or mud. When your are on your knees in mud, digging out a 80,000 pound piece of equipment buried to the frame in mud you have definite preferences. The E tools are good for digging in the mud, but poor for digging out a vehicle buried to the frame in snow. Since I live in both mud and snow county and have room for only one tool, I chose the current US E tool. It has the straight blade for digging and the tool can be folded over for easier snow removal.
 
I actually found a WWII entrenching tool sticking out of a garbage can. Picked it up and rang the bell of the house who's trash can it was. I asked the lady who answered the bell if I could have it and she said yes. Thia was back in the late 60's. Gave it to my wife as a garden shovel. Local surplus store was selling the west german ones with leather sheath for $10 bucks. This one has a wooden handle fixed to the shovel by a big brass pin. And has a finger like piece that can be used to chew up the dirt before using it as a shovel. Frank
 
Last edited:
For what it is, it is fine. But, in actual use it is limited. Back in the 1970's used a standard USGI folding shovel at various times doing landscaping, digging stumps, etc. With the edge of the blade filed sharp, that thing was the business! Ideal for close work, digging a stuck truck out, etc. Very handy for killing snakes, etc. Have a standard USGI 1944 dated AMES entrenching tool. Bought it new... at a farming exhibition about 2010. Went home that day with some fresh milled grits and that entrenching tool. All in all, it is a better mousetrap. JMHO. Sincerely. bruce.
 
I've been meaning to pick up on the entrenching tool to keep in my car just in case. Nice and small package that does t take up space and can be useful when stuck in snow. Somehow I always seem to forget to pick one up when I'm at a gun show
 
I've kept one of the folding GI models in the toolbox of my truck for years, and have had the dubious pleasure of digging out of hub-deep mud. Handy item, but not one I'm going to commission a carved, laced holster for, or wear on a buscadero rig to barbeque.
 
For what it is, it is fine. But, in actual use it is limited. Back in the 1970's used a standard USGI folding shovel at various times doing landscaping, digging stumps, etc. With the edge of the blade filed sharp, that thing was the business! Ideal for close work, digging a stuck truck out, etc. Very handy for killing snakes, etc. Have a standard USGI 1944 dated AMES entrenching tool. Bought it new... at a farming exhibition about 2010. Went home that day with some fresh milled grits and that entrenching tool. All in all, it is a better mousetrap. JMHO. Sincerely. bruce.

From someone who has used them for several years, they are not limited. Great for digging, excellent choppers and cutters (once sharpened). I have also used USGI entrenching tools in the field and find this Russian example to be superior. They can even be thrown very effectively, which is of dubious utility but fun nonetheless. :)
 
Last edited:
From someone who has used them for several years, they are not limited. Great for digging, excellent choppers and cutters (once sharpened). They can even be thrown very effectively, which is of dubious utility but fun nonetheless. :)

Ha! Throwing a shovel!? I never! Makes me think of something someone once said about throwing a sword as being just another way to disarm yourself!
 
I must live a pretty soft life. I haven't had need of an entrenching tool since I left Vietnam in November of 1968!

I don't live in snow country :eek: and rarely see mud enough to get my vehicle stuck in it. We do have sand on our beaches but I haven't been stuck in sand since I was a high school Romeo wannabe with a little cutie watching the submarine races along the Gulf. :D

So, the neat tools reviewed do have a cool factor, especially if sharpened, but I can't imagine needing one for anything I may face.

I know, I know,....sigh....you're thinking that I may need one in my Bug Out Kit when "IT" happens.

However, living in Paradise, cleverly disguised as Urban Sprawl, if "IT" happens there (1) ain't no place to go from here and (2) ain't no way to get there if there was a place.

But, for all of you not living in Paradise, grab one at the next gun show and enjoy.

Bob
 
Our shovels of choice are the post-World War II Bundeswehr entrenching tools whose shovel housing incorporates a competitive shovel with a button-controlled "full-bore" pick. Both shovel and pick can orient parallel with handle or perpendicular - at the user's option. As a tool, I believe these are demonstrably more useful than devices of the review.

That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
 
Thank you for a nice review JayFramer! Have owned the Cold Steel model for many years. Find it to be a useful tool. It sits in a compartment in my Toyota 4X4.
 
Back
Top