If the bank got robbed and the posse caught up to the robber two days later when his horse went lame, would you lynch the guy on the spot or wait to see if he would tell where he buried the gold?
Jim won't be doing any business through his use of this forum, so why stop his ability to communicate here?
It may or may not do any good, but for now that ability to communicate will remain intact.

THE MAIN OBJECTIVE HERE IS TO SEE THE CONSIGNORS MADE WHOLE.

So for now, Jim Brewster can communicate through this forum.

__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett

So far the facts are that he owes people ~$500K (that has been reported) and that the court has denied his defense claim of excusable negligence. I think all of us forum members are looking for the unvarnished explanation —- that Mr. Brewster will not share other than it’s “legal”. What am I missing here?

They think everything else is their business, why not be useful? If they decide he’s in the business of dealing firearms, well they sure had lots of opinions on that lately. Also, when firearms cross state lines they are supposed to be subject to a 4473.

Again, i’m no ATF lover, but as long as we’re stuck with them, perhaps they could do some good. If that’s possible.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Anyone so inclined can enter Mr Brewster’s name into the court case search, and see some prior judgements against from 2022 that may be of interest.

I’m not hot-linking the cases, in an effort to not doxx the parties involved. This is, however, public info.

__________________
- Post No Bills -

Not entirely clear, but from what was posted earlier the excusable neglect claim looks like it may have been in the context of a motion to extend time to file an answer so as to prevent a default judgment. In other words, the argument may have been that there was some reason to allow an untimely response to the complaint, rather than an argument as to the merits of the lawsuit.

So is he still currently selling on GB if so using what name?

This situation deeply saddens me, and my heart goes out to everyone affected. I truly hope those impacted can find justice and support during this difficult time.

One immediate thought that comes to mind is reaching out to the postal inspectors for assistance. If any part of this involved mailing the items or sending payment through the postal system, there may be grounds to argue mail fraud. This was a key factor in the college admissions scandal, where fraudulent acceptances were sent via mail, leading to federal charges. Given the potential dollar amount involved here, I believe it could be substantial enough to warrant their attention. I hope this suggestion can be of help in seeking accountability and resolution.

__________________
Jack SWCA #3134, SWHF #494

S15 Guns

Sent from my SM-G781U1 using Tapatalk

__________________
Regards,
Bruce

Maybe I can explain some of this. Sarah15, the LLC, did not file an Answer to the Complaint in the allowed time and asked for more time to do so. The LLC claimed "excusable neglect" as the reason for failing to respond to the Complaint. That's one reason permitted under the Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court found there was no excusable neglect and ordered judgment entered against Sarah15. That goes only to liability, not to the amount of the judgment. That will likely require another hearing. It's probably of little moment anyway as the LLC likely has few if any assets that can be executed on to enforce the judgment. Lawler also asked for judgment against Brewster, individually, and the court withheld a decision on that pending further briefing on a pending motion for summary judgment. So, bottom line, the court has held Sarah15 liable but has not yet specified an amount, and has deferred for now a decision as to Brewster in his individual capacity. I will not be surprised if this goes on for quite a while.

__________________
Everybody could shoot

I thought I read earlier in this thread that Sarah15 was a sole proprietor and that S15 Guns is an LLC. Thought he posted that, as an explanation as to why sarah15 wasn't on gb but is now S15.

Sarah 15 is referred to in the court record as "Sarah 15 Ltd" so it's a separate entity, probably a LLC. It would be referred to here as a LLC or Limited Liability Company. It is not, according to the record, Mr. Brewster acting individually as a DBA.

__________________
Everybody could shoot

I , like others , don't have a dog in this fight . But being a member of the S&WCA for a while now , leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth . I read this and then talked about it with my wife and both of us are just disgusted . There's so many good people here and to see some of you hurt by Jim , it just makes me wonder how he could have hurt those of you he did . The sad thing is , I had him down as the person to contact if I passed before my wife did , like another poster . I sincerely hope those of you that were hurt get the money owed you .

On another note ....... Why don't all of you meet up and hire a lawyer ? Anything over a certain amount is a felony , so between fines and money owed he could be looking at jail time . He may be going bankrupt , so you need to get your names in as creditors . You may not get much , but something is better than nothing . Right now all you have is his promise , which isn't worth jack**** . Get the courts working for you and take him for everything you can .

Correct me if I’m wrong, but based on my search of the Secretary of State’s website, it appears that the LLC in question was not formed until 12/12/2024. If that’s the case, then this legal matter predates its creation.

That said, I have no personal stake in this situation—I’m simply hoping that those expecting payment receive what they are rightfully owed.

Based on my quick research, this case has been ongoing for about a year, yet a new LLC was recently formed, seemingly to mitigate liability, while payments have been paused. Legally, such a move often signals potential bankruptcy, though there could be other explanations.

Though I think the major question there is why are you focusing on forming an LLC vs devoting your time and efforts to making your customers whole.

__________________
Jack SWCA #3134, SWHF #494

I have read this thread from the very beginning and in the early posts I read where Jim Brewster, Sarah15guns, wasn’t on GB anymore by that name. I had him in my saved searches and watched his auctions for years. I seen all the guns he sold from the Trotter Collection and from other families as well that have never recovered or received payment as I followed him for a long time until recently. He then disappeared until I read these posts and seen his new user ID on GB. I did find him under his new user name of S15 GUN on GB and did see the auctions he had listed end Sunday night. Why in the world would GB let him come back under a new user name and consign guns for unsuspecting people. I’ve never had Sarah15guns sell anything for me but I’m sure there are some more forum members here that have been scammed by this man and not received payment. This guy is a scammer, first and foremost, and I don’t know why he’s being treated as somebody special. Beats me. So many people have been taken in by this once well respected man and friend to many that their eyes are foggy. I hope everyone that has been taken advantage of by this guy receives compensation.
After reading all the posts about the loss of funds in the deals involving Sarah15guns and the forum members that dealt with him and never been paid, I suspect there is a lot more out there that fell victim to his dishonest ways.
It saddens me to read this and sheds a dim light on the honest sellers.

__________________
James
On the Llano Estacado

He is still selling on GB under the name S15 GUN
Several active auctions running now.

Like many here, I know Jim and have conversed with him on several occasions. At that time, he was above reproach and did a lot of good for the SWCA, including shipping firearms bought at the auction on his own dime. It is shockingly sad that things have turned out the way they appear to be. My optimist side hopes that everything will turn out for the best and everyone will eventually receive their money when the legal matters have been resolved. While I respect Jim following his lawyer's advice (that's what you pay them for!), I know it rankles people due money and understand their concerns and dismay. At the same time, there is no reason to make physical threats, veiled or otherwise, on a public forum. The same applies for wishing ill happenings upon Jim's family. That is uncalled for and will not be tolerated.

__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!

/\/\Read that again/\


For those with low reading comprehension, read it again! \/


Seriously?
We actually have to tell some of you this?
Keep it reasonable, people.
If you can't remain reasonable, SHUT UP.

__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett

Questioning his motives is definitely fair! I know NOTHING about the legality of this situation, but something tells me that forming the LLC was NOT done in the spirit of making the consignors whole! It was done solely for his protection.
Larry

__________________
Miss Buddies crsides & fat tom

I have always been told that when things are at their worse you truly find out who your friends are.

This thread clearly shows that statement to be no truer words spoken.

Now I don't know this person, nor have I consigned any firearms with him. I know there are some here who have and I hope that they are made whole once this issue is settled.

But what I do know is that he is in some sort of legal dispute with a customer and it is in the hands of the court. I am not part of the lawsuit nor have I, like most of you, read the filings, notes, etc...

So while people sit here and label this person a "thief", "conman", whatever, we really don't know the details.

And he can only respond with what his attorney tells him that it is okay to say because he doesn't want to effect the court case.

Now with that said he may be as guilty as can be. Or he may be just a person that is in a bad situation right now and is trying to work his way out of it. I don't know.

But some of you should show a little grace and wait until the verdict is in before passing judgement.

As stated above I hope those who currently have a vested interest in this matter get made whole. Ironically most of you seem to be the ones that are waiting things out without judgement and hoping for the best.

Good luck to all involved.

moral to this story quit being lazy and sell YOUR own guns its really not hard.nor is it illeagle.

Either you believe the posts in this thread or you don’t. The details have been exposed. And some of you believe him when he says he was relying on the advice of counsel?? Cmon people, think! What lawyer says “you’re in a heap of trouble. My advice is to not pay MORE people”. Not a one. My advice to him would have been: STOP taking any more consignments!! You are making a solid fraud case against yourself!
He picked up my guns about 40 days after the end of Mikes and Vince’s auction, about 26 days after he didn’t send payment to them and others. The lawsuit has been pending for a year. He’s owed the Trotter estate over $400,000 for some time.
This ain’t rocket science folks.

__________________
Illegitimi non carborundum

I bet you wished you sold on the forum. The Trotter family certainly does, I’m sure. Perhaps letting something go at a fixed price and actually getting paid for it is better than consigning with an outfit, reaping the benefits of a bidding war you might not have gotten on the forum, only not to receive anything from the middleman.

I think all of the big name auction houses dealing in firearms are above board when it comes to being paid—at least for now. But if you think consigning to them grants you immunity, there was a prominent middle of the road auction house—which I used to attend from time to time—located in Northern Virginia that ended up going under about 20 years ago and consigners were never paid. The auction house stated when it became public knowledge that it was a “misunderstanding”.

Now, I expect to see the Classifieds section of this forum overflowing with quality offerings soon.😄

I generally don’t sell many firearms, but the few I have sold generally make it to the Classifieds section of the forum. And I’ve had good results, too.

It happens from time to time—even your best friend stabs you in the back.

As for why Gunbroker lets Sarah15 sell under a different name? Profit. I get it that most in Gunbroker are legitimate, honest folks. But some aren’t. Enough that it’s advantageous for Gunbroker to allow tarnished sellers to list under a different name. REVENUE.

I once sold a holster on Gunbroker to see what would happen. In hopes of this going well, and then post a few firearms actually inspired by Sarah15 and open at a penny, a few bidding wars might ensue, go to the bank…. I’m so glad I experimented with this $11.00 holster. Saw what I netted on it, decided that’s likely not worthwhile.

Yes there are others out there owned. Not at all defending him but this isn’t the first time this stuff has happened in the world. The only times I’ve lost money been scammed or Wtv was from things on this forum. USPS MO not getting stuff, people selling stuff for me and ever getting paid. Just watch every move you can make. I agree with others and let’s get the gun section good and busy with revolvers etc like it used to be. I was going to take some to Jim to sell now I’ll be listing here. Everyone got excited what GB was bringing or seen one high price then went for greed. No one sold what they used to go for. Yes action places might get you more at this risk or a long turn around time for money.

As I recently told Mr. Brewster, “the results are always perfect for the choices we make “. MAKE GOOD CHOICES.

I don't know. It often seems the quote: "No good deed shall go unpunished." is far more applicable.

__________________
So many S&W's, so few funds!!

Not sure if or when I’ll get to selling, but I’ll certainly be working on my revolver photography and lighting skills.
This story is certainly a warning

Well it's obvious that all of the facts aren't in this thread.

I hope this all gets resolved quickly.

not taking up for GB, but wondering if they know , as in is S15 GUN using the same IP address, emails, bank info? and did Gunbroker actually flag the old accounts?


re the holsters,,, don't waste you time, the market for that stuff online is ebay, much bigger market and much better prices,

I've been a member going on 12 years and I've had only one problem . I hadn't been here long and bought a S&W here and the seller never posted he was sending it himself . My FFL at the time , not anymore , accepted it and said I had to send it back . The seller never responded and finally I told my FFL to just keep it .

Since then I have bought and sold guns and mags , never the first problem . I've even sent stuff before I received payment . Of course I watch who I deal with , but with one problem over 12 years , I feel blessed . I will sell here before GB . Let me rephrase , I will never sell on GB . We have an excellent bunch of people , and I will sell here when I have something to sell .

I have been using a local auction house for three years now. Every month I sell 2-3 firearms. I will continue to use them. Yes, Sarah15 has apparently stopped making payments but how does that condemn other auction houses? It doesn’t.

If one nut job uses a firearm for a mass shooting does that mean all gun owners are going to do the same? Of course not.

Kevin

__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.

^^^^ Well said Kevin, still waiting for them to auction your .22 German single shot. Larry

I also don't have a dog in this fight although I never met Jim in person, we spoke on the phone on occasion several years back.

Was just looking at the GunBroker listings for S15 GUN and the only feedback he currently has is as a BUYER and he purchased a GunBroker GOLD MEMBERSHIP

So obviously no feedback as of yet from anyone who is buying from him.

This is quite a dilemma to say the least, will be interested to see how it all goes and hoping you all get at least something back for what you have lost.

__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303

The holster came with a revolver and I didn’t want it. The point in selling was to establish one sale in case I wanted to sell a firearm on Gunbroker, so I had at least one feedback. After all the fees at the time of sale and another fee that posted several days or weeks after the sale—no thank you!

Also, sell on this forum and maybe you bet a bit more that a buyer might have paid towards SALES TAX. Or, at the very least, buy from on the forum and avoid it. As unattractive to me as Gunbroker is, once sales tax was instituted over there, it lost even more appeal!

Further speculation on this situation is useless. This is a matter between Jim Brewster and his consignors. We are done here.
If any factual data comes to light, please convey it to me via PM or email before posting it.
Jim and his family have received numerous threats of physical harm. That is callous, illegal, and just plain wrong!
His family will be subjected to enough unpleasantness in this situation. Leave them alone.

__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett