My firearms were legally bought and the last one in 1981.
They, the government and or authorities, are welcome to look for all the literal ‘paper work’, but I will refuse to submit any of my firearms for registration under my Constitutional Rights that protect me.
I wear only Carhartt B01 pants which are both union made and made in the USA.
Make sure they are the 'Men's Double-Front Work Dungaree and B01'. :cool:
This is the hardest thing any dog owner has to do.
My current dog a Pit bull mix I rescued (I was the fourth owner when she was just 8 months old of this abused dog) and she is 11 years old now and the most affectionate dog I have had (she is the fifth dog I have had).
I am 68 now and she will...
I am not an employee of Smith and Wesson and I say what I please about the company.
The recall has more to do with a ‘Legal Liability’ and I also believe from experience ‘If it’s not broken don’t fix it.’
The ‘New’ S&W revolvers with a ‘lock and key’ on the side plate next to the cylinder...
This is a legal liability for S&W and unless they recall all 686 with this potential problem S&W will be liable and the idea that they would no longer honor this recall is absurd.
As for ‘qualified gun smiths’ S&W has a problem here as well as in their production facility.
One person has...
As I posted earlier anytime you ‘open up’ a firearm for repair you risk a faulty gun smith having a bad day and having your firearm repaired for one problem and coming back with another.
I have a 686 no dash and would only send it in if it had a problem.
The ‘Recall’ is only a liability...
As a retired Union Journeymen Mechanic I would not send my 686 (no dash) for service unless I had a problem.
Any gun service always has a risk of anyone having a bad day and I feel the same way about automobile repair. If it does not need it, do not open it up. ;)
I have both the S&W Target grips and stock grips and for my purpose to carry a .22 as ‘Kit Gun’ I use the original grips when I put this firearm as a part of ‘Kit’. ;)