The Lee-Enfield rifle: stalwart Brit! (revised 9/6/13)

Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
10,358
Reaction score
51,881
Location
Arizona
LEE-ENFIELD-1280_zps2bc6012d-1.jpg


A future article. Comments welcome.

John

The Lee-Enfield rifle will forever be associated with its long use by the British Empire. Its extensive history, iconic profile and reputation for reliability and rapid fire indelibly etch it into one’s mind as a one of the true military rifle classics. It was one of the most successful bolt action rifles in its time frame, which spanned from 1895 to the 1990s. Produced by many nations, including the United States, it’s been distributed worldwide and even today can be found in the hands of combatants in the mountains and plains of Afghanistan. The sun never sets on Lee-Enfield rifles. It’s been estimated that over 17 million have been produced.

The Lee-Enfield was essentially a redesign of the black powder Lee-Metford Mk I rifle, which was the brainchild of James Paris Lee (1831-1904), a Scottish-Canadian who moved to America in 1858. The Lee-Metford was adopted by the British Army in 1888. The first Lee-Enfields were introduced in 1895, as the .303 caliber “Rifle, Magazine, Lee-Enfield.” This differed from the Lee-Metford primarily in usng a deeper rifling developed by Enfield Arsenal, as the more shallow Metford rifling fared badly after smokeless Cordite powder replaced compressed black powder charges. This was a long, heavy weapon. The MLE (nicknamed “Emily”) was superseded in December, 1902 by the Short Magazine Lee-Enfield Mk I (SMLE). This one was popularly known as “Smelly.” The “Short” in the designation does not refer to the magazine, but to the length of the rifle. While the MLEs had 30.2-inch barrels and the cavalry carbines had 20-inchers, the new rifle was much lighter than the MLE and had a mid-length 25-inch barrel. Then in 1907 the SMLE Mk III appeared. It fired a redesigned .303 high velocity spitzer round designated as the Mk VII cartridge. This utilized a pointed 174-grain bullet instead of the previous 215-grain rounded bullet. This model then became standard issue throughout the World War I period. SMLEs achieved an enviable reputation for rapidity of fire. A trained infantryman could get off as many as 15 - 30 shots a minute including reloading. The action of the rifle separated the extraction and cocking phases (it cocked on closing), and so enabled quick manipulation. The Germans of WWI sometimes reported that they were facing machine guns, when in reality they were encountering well-trained Brits shooting their rifles at full tilt. The demand for rapid production during WWI spawned some modifications that allowed reductions in cost and more efficient manufacturing. Long range sights on the side of the rifle were eliminated and the magazine cut-off was deleted. The revised SMLE Mk III* (Mark III star) was renamed after the war to be the Rifle, No. 1, with various mark numbers.

The Mark III* or No. 1 rifle was to see plenty of action in the years to come. The standards were set at a weight of about 8.8 pounds and a length of 44 ½ inches. The barrel length was fixed at 25 inches. The Mk VII Ball cartridge had a muzzle velocity of approximately 2440 feet per second, giving the rifle an effective range of about 550 yards. The weapon had a removable box magazine with a capacity of 10 rounds. It was designed to be reloaded by 5-round clips or “chargers” from the top. The magazine was removable primarily for cleaning or replacement purposes, and only one was issued with each rifle. Individual cartridges could be fed into the magazine as well. The rifle utilized a sliding ramp rear sight and post front sight, drift adjustable for windage. It could be equipped with scope sights for sniper purposes. The Lee-Enfield design featured rear locking lugs. This allowed a shorter and therefore quicker bolt movement. Another great design feature was the removable bolt head. This could be unscrewed and changed to compensate for differences in headspace. The 10-round magazine had greater capacity than most of its contemporaries. The Enfields also had generous chamber dimensions which allowed for dirty ammunition, easing extraction when the rifle was fouled or overheated from firing. All had two-piece stocks.

In World War II, yet another variation was introduced. This was the No. 4 Mk I, which was adopted for the British services in 1941. The weight was somewhat reduced, and it utilized a spike-type bayonet often referred to by its users as the “pig sticker” or “tent peg.” A somewhat more mass-producible version was the No. 4 Mk I* (Mark I star). It was manufactured at the Long Branch arsenal in Canada and by the Savage-Stevens company in the United States. The U.S.-produced weapons were all marked “U.S. PROPERTY” and were specifically made for lend-lease to the British. None were ever standard issue for U.S. troops. Some of these rifles had 2-groove rifling instead of the standard 5-groove. These U.S. rifles had a simplified bolt release, and had the rear sight mounted on the receiver, as with all No. 4's. The rear stock was made in several lengths in order to fit individual soldiers. The rifle illustrated is a Savage-Stevens-made example, manufactured in 1942 in Chicopee Falls, Massachusetts. Winchester Repeating Arms Company made a large quantity of .303 British ammunition to go with the rifles. Both the rifles and the ammunition are collector items today. No. 4 rifles equipped with sniper scopes were used during WWII and on into the Korean War and beyond. Australia did not adopt the No. 4, and continued to make the No. 1 rifle until it was replaced by the L1A1 self-loading rifle.

A variant popularly known as the “jungle carbine” was also manufactured during World War II. It was designated as the No. 5 Mk I. This weapon had a cone-shaped flash suppressor and a drastically reduced length for portability. It also had a rather ineffective recoil pad. The recoil on this lightweight carbine can only be described as brutal, and it was not well received in the field. It was soon declared obsolete. Many examples also had a problem of a "wandering zero,” the cause of which was never diagnosed properly. The Australians made a few similar experimental carbines designated No. 6, Mk I. The production life of the No. 5 Mk I was quite short, making it collectible today. Be advised that there are some cobbled-up fakes resembling these weapons, so be sure of what you are looking to acquire.

There was an unusual pistol-caliber carbine made for British special operations. This was known as the “De Lisle Carbine,” and was specifically designed for covert assassination purposes. It was a Lee-Enfield modified to chamber and fire the .45 ACP cartridge from a short barrel. It featured an integral sound suppressor and was fed from a standard M1911 pistol magazine. Also, many Lee-Enfields were modified to chamber .22 rimfire cartridges for inexpensive training purposes.

During the Cold War, the 7.62x51 NATO cartridge became standard. In Britain, a few Lee-Enfields were converted to fire this new round, and but it was not adopted by the British military in standard form. However, the scoped L42A1 sniper rifle was made for the 7.62mm round and has seen extensive use. The Indian Ishapore arsenal did make standard Lee-Enfields in 7.62mm, as well as some .410 shotguns using the Lee-Enfield action. Production of standard 7.62mm rifles started in 1963 and ran through 1975. These rifles had a muzzle velocity of 2600 feet per second, and utilized a 12-round detachable box magazine. Loading was by 5-round stripper clips. Some of these are in use even today. These 7.62mm Indian rifles used improved steel over earlier No. 1 rifles. Britain produced some 7.62mm L39A1 “Envoy” rifles, which were target rifles fitted with short forestocks and target sights.

A large number of manufacturing sites produced the various Lee-Enfields. In Britain, these included the Royal Small Arms Factory at Enfield, the Royal Small Arms Factory at Sparkbrook, Birmingham Small Arms Company Ltd., London Small Arms Company Ltd., the Royal Ordnance Factory at Fazakerley, the Royal Ordnance Factory at Maltby, and the Birmingham Small Arms Factory at Shirley. As mentioned, American Lee-Enfields were produced by the Savage-Stevens Company. Canadian versions were made at their Long Branch Arsenal. In Pakistan, they were manufactured at the various Pakistan Ordnance Factories, and in India at the Ishapore Arsenal. Australian rifles came out of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory.

Although replaced by the L1A1 7.62mm SLR rifle in 1957, the Lee-Enfields remained in the British service until the early 1960s. The 7.62 mm L42A1 sniper rifles soldiered on until the 1990s. Standard SMLEs are still in service with some Commonwealth nations.

Nations using the Lee-Enfield rifles besides the United Kingdom have included Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Italy (post WWII), Ireland, Israel, Nepal, New Zealand, Norway, Greece, the Netherlands, Malaysia, Pakistan, Republic of China (Savage-Stevens-made No. 4 Mk I* rifles were provided to RoC forces in India during WW II), Rhodesia, South Africa, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, and the United States. U.S. utilization occurred during WWI when some members of the American Expeditionary Force attached to British and Australian units borrowed and used them, and Merrill's Marauders used some in Burma in WWII.

Often regarded as inferior to the Mauser system in the strength of its action and its lack of gilt-edged accuracy, the Lee-Enfield proved to be one of the most “soldier proof” rifles of its day. It was reliable, extremely fast in operation, easily maintained in the field, and distributed in large numbers around the world. It surely ranks among the classic military rifles of the 20th Century.


(c) 2013 JLM
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Good article, as usual, thanks. I've wanted one of those rifles in .303 for many years; but since I can no longer hunt, it remains a dream.

I had never heard of the DeLisle: that's fascinating.
 
Nice article! I've always liked the old "smelly" and I for one consider it to be the best bolt action battle rifle ever. I have a few but my current favorite is the Ishapore #2A in 7.62 NATO, what a great rifle! Thanks for sharing your work.
 
Nice article. Have had many Enfields. The MkI was always my favorite w/it's slideing charger bridge.
I may just take the MkI* rifle out to the range tomorrow.
A BSA mfg commercial marked piece & still targeted for the heavier Mk6 ammo.
 
Great rifles. I bought a no4 mk1 in 2010 and put in storage. Shot it for the first time in July. I was thinking about selling, but decided to keep it after range trip. :D
 
Last edited:
Nice article. Have had many Enfields. The MkI was always my favorite w/it's slideing charger bridge.
I may just take the MkI* rifle out to the range tomorrow.
A BSA mfg commercial marked piece & still targeted for the heavier Mk6 ammo.
I had a Fazakerly made #4Mk1* during the '80s. It was a nice shooting gun, accurate and VERY fast.
 
I had a Fazakerly made #4Mk1* during the '80s. It was a nice shooting gun, accurate and VERY fast.

I don't think I ever owned a #4 rifle. My two MkI's are the early SMLE's in the 1904/06 era. My brother still has his #4 rifle though, a LongBranch Arsenal version he bought when we were in our early teens yet. I think his was something like $9.95 off the rack at the time. I bought Loewe/Berlin 1893 Mauser that looked unissued at the same time. I spent the big bucks at around $12 or $15 for mine but got the matching bayonet & scabbard.
I wonder what ever happened to that rifle. I think it turned into a Nylon 66 at some point.
SMLE's no matter the era are very fast and smooth to operate. So much for the slow, difficult to use cock on closing argument.
 
I own a No4 and love it despite the fact that its one of the more difficult bolt actions to operate for a lefty like me. All others I can shoot just as fast as a right handed person without unsholdering the rifle. However I still love the way it shoots and its peep sights. My came with a more traditional "knife" blade bayonet instead of the spike. If only 303 was cheap(er).

I still have the idea in the back of my mind to find a none collectable, none matching ...but a solid shooter No4 and have it converted to 7.62x54. The ammo is close enough and ive heard of it being done

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk 2
 
I don't think I ever owned a #4 rifle. My two MkI's are the early SMLE's in the 1904/06 era.
Back in the '90s, a friend and I were walking into the Ohio Gun Collector's Association Show in Cleveland, when he walked past a guy carrying a beautiful #1MkIII. My friend instantly doubled back and stopped the guy. It was an Iraqi marked gun, in at least VG condition and my friend bought it on the spot.
 
John,

Great article.

You could add that No. 1 Mk IIIs, No. 4s and No. 5s could be fitting to individual solders by changing to shorter or longer stocks. Standard stocks were not marked for length. Shorter and longer stocks were stamped with a letter on top of the stock near the butt. No. 1 short stocks were stamped B for bantam. No. 4 & 5 short stocks were stamped S. All the long stocks were stamped L.

Also on later No. 4s the trigger attachment/hinge pin was moved from the trigger guard to the receiver to maintain a more consistent sear engagement so trigger release could be improved. Some earlier No. 4s were retrofitted this way. I forget the markings for this but I’m sure they’re in your books.

During the 1990s many No. 4s manufactured in their final two years, 1955 and 1956, were imported unfired smeared with cosmoline in their factory wax paper cocoon. Like other post WWII No. 4s they have chambers dimensioned to sporting rifle standards rather than being over reamed to accept muddy cartridges. Despite their beach stocks IMO they are the most desirable SMLEs. One LGS had them for $169 plus tax including their handless knife. Not bad for a new rifle!
 
Last edited:
Aloha,

MANY years ago when I was just barely legal to buy and own a firearm, I got a No 5 Jungle carbine from the local surplus store.

Back then they had them piled into wooden barrels and sold for $50 or less.

Sears was selling WWII 98k Mausers in the catalog for $39,

Anyway, to say that the recoil of the No 5 is "brutal" is a big understatement.

I sold it to a friend for what I had in it, plus he got the ammo I had too.

My 375 H & H shoots more softly.
 
LEE-ENFIELD-1280_zps2bc6012d-1.jpg


A future article. Comments welcome.

John

The Lee-Enfield rifle will forever be associated with its long use by the British Empire. Its extensive history, iconic profile and reputation for reliability and rapid fire indelibly etch it into one’s mind as a one of the true military rifle classics. It was one of the most successful bolt action rifles in its time frame, which spanned from 1895 to the 1990s. Produced by many nations, including the United States, it’s been distributed worldwide and even today can be found in the hands of combatants in the mountains and plains of Afghanistan. The sun never sets on Lee-Enfield rifles. It’s been estimated that over 17 million have been produced.

The Lee-Enfield was essentially a redesign of the black powder Lee-Metford Mk I rifle, which was the brainchild of James Paris Lee (1831-1904), a Scottish-Canadian who moved to America in 1858. The Lee-Metford was adopted by the British Army in 1888. The first Lee-Enfields were introduced in 1895, as the .303 caliber “Rifle, Magazine, Lee-Enfield.” This differed from the Lee-Metford primarily in usng a deeper rifling developed by Enfield Arsenal, as the more shallow Metford rifling fared badly after smokeless Cordite powder replaced compressed black powder charges. This was a long, heavy weapon. The MLE (nicknamed “Emily”) was superseded in December, 1902 by the Short Magazine Lee-Enfield Mk I (SMLE). This one was popularly known as “Smelly.” The “Short” in the designation does not refer to the magazine, but to the length of the rifle. While the MLEs had 30.2-inch barrels and the cavalry carbines had 20-inchers, the new rifle was much lighter than the MLE and had a mid-length 25-inch barrel. Then in 1907 the SMLE Mk III appeared. It fired a redesigned .303 high velocity spitzer round designated as the Mk VII cartridge. This utilized a pointed 174-grain bullet instead of the previous 215-grain rounded bullet. This model then became standard issue throughout the World War I period. SMLEs achieved an enviable reputation for rapidity of fire. A trained infantryman could get off as many as 15 - 30 shots a minute including reloading. The action of the rifle separated the extraction and cocking phases (it cocked on closing), and so enabled quick manipulation. The Germans of WWI sometimes reported that they were facing machine guns, when in reality they were encountering well-trained Brits shooting their rifles at full tilt. The demand for rapid production during WWI spawned some modifications that allowed reductions in cost and more efficient manufacturing. Long range sights on the side of the rifle were eliminated and the magazine cut-off was deleted. The revised SMLE Mk III* (Mark III star) was renamed after the war to be the Rifle, No. 1, with various mark numbers.

The Mark III* or No. 1 rifle was to see plenty of action in the years to come. The standards were set at a weight of about 8.8 pounds and a length of 44 ½ inches. The barrel length was fixed at 25 inches. The Mk VII Ball cartridge had a muzzle velocity of approximately 2440 feet per second, giving the rifle an effective range of about 550 yards. The weapon had a removable box magazine with a capacity of 10 rounds. It was designed to be reloaded by 5-round clips or “chargers” from the top. The magazine was removable primarily for cleaning or replacement purposes, and only one was issued with each rifle. Individual cartridges could be fed into the magazine as well. The rifle utilized a sliding ramp rear sight and post front sight, drift adjustable for windage. It could be equipped with scope sights for sniper purposes. The Lee-Enfield design featured rear locking lugs. This allowed a shorter and therefore quicker bolt movement. Another great design feature was the removable bolt head. This could be unscrewed and changed to compensate for differences in headspace. The 10-round magazine had greater capacity than most of its contemporaries. The Enfields also had generous chamber dimensions which allowed for dirty ammunition, easing extraction when the rifle was fouled or overheated from firing. All had two-piece stocks.

In World War II, yet another variation was introduced. This was the No. 4 Mk I, which was adopted for the British services in 1941. The weight was somewhat reduced, ??? and it utilized a spike-type bayonet often referred to by its users as the “pig sticker” or “tent peg.” A somewhat more mass-producible version was the No. 4 Mk I* (Mark I star). It was manufactured at the Long Branch arsenal in Canada and by the Savage-Stevens company in the United States. The U.S.-produced weapons were all marked “U.S. PROPERTY” and were specifically made for lend-lease to the British. None were ever standard issue for U.S. troops. Some of these rifles had 2-groove rifling instead of the standard 5-groove; had a simplified bolt release, and the rear sight on all No. 4's is mounted on the receiver. The rifle illustrated is a Savage-made example, manufactured in 1942 in Chicopee Falls, Massachusetts. Winchester Repeating Arms Company made a large quantity of .303 British ammunition to go with the rifles. Both the rifles and the ammunition are collector items today. No. 4 rifles equipped with sniper scopes were used during WWII and on into the Korean War and beyond. (Australia did not adopt the No. 4, making the No. 1 rifle until replaced by the FN selfloading rifle.)

A variant popularly known as the “jungle carbine” was also manufactured during World War II. It was designated as the No. 5 Mk I. This weapon had a cone-shaped flash suppressor and a drastically reduced length for portability. It also had a rather ineffective recoil pad. The recoil on this lightweight carbine can only be described as brutal, and it was not well received in the field. It was eventually declared obsolete for many examples having a problem of a "wandering zero", the cause of which was mysterious.The Australians made a few similar experimental carbines designated No. 6, Mk I. The production life of the No. 5 Mk I was quite short, making it collectible today. Be advised that there are some cobbled-up fakes resembling these weapons, so be sure of what you are considering to acquire.

There was an unusual pistol-caliber carbine made for British special operations. This was known as the “De Lisle Carbine,” and was specifically designed for covert assassination purposes. It was a Lee-Enfield modified to chamber and fire the .45 ACP cartridge from a short barrel. It featured an integral sound suppressor and was fed from a standard M1911 pistol magazine. Also, many Lee-Enfields were modified to chamber .22 rimfire cartridges for inexpensive training purposes.

During the Cold War, the 7.62x51 NATO cartridge became standard. In Britain, a few Lee-Enfields were converted to fire this new round, and but it was not adopted by the British military in standard form. However, the scoped L42A1 sniper rifle was made for the 7.62mm round and has seen extensive use. The Indian Ishapore arsenal did make standard Lee-Enfields in 7.62mm, as well as some .410 shotguns using the Lee-Enfield action. Production of standard 7.62mm rifles started in 1963 and ran through 1975. These rifles had a muzzle velocity of 2600 feet per second, and utilized a 12-round detachable box magazine. Loading was by 5-round stripper clips. Some of these are in use even today. These 7.62mm Indian rifles used improved steel over earlier No. 1 rifles. Britain produced some 7.62mm L39A1 “Envoy” rifles, which were target rifles fitted with short forestocks and target sights.

Quite a number of manufacturing sites produced the various Lee-Enfields. In Britain, these included the Royal Small Arms Factory at Enfield, the Royal Small Arms Factory at Sparkbrook, Birmingham Small Arms Company Ltd., London Small Arms Company Ltd., the Royal Ordnance Factory at Fazakerley, the Royal Ordnance Factory at Maltby, and the Birmingham Small Arms Factory at Shirley. As mentioned, American Lee-Enfields were produced by the Savage-Stevens Company. Canadian versions were made at their Long Branch Arsenal. In Pakistan, they were manufactured at the various Pakistan Ordnance Factories. Australian rifles came out of the Lithgow Small Arms Factory.

Although replaced by the L1A1 7.62mm SLR rifle in 1957, the Lee-Enfields remained in the British service until the early 1960s. The 7.62 mm L42A1 sniper rifles soldiered on until the 1990s. Standard SMLEs are still in service with some Commonwealth nations.

Nations using the Lee-Enfield rifles besides the United Kingdom have included Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Italy (post WWII), Ireland, Israel, Nepal, New Zealand, Norway, Greece, the Netherlands, Malaysia, Pakistan, Republic of China (Savage-made No. 4 Mk I* rifles were provided to RoC forces in India during WW II), Rhodesia, South Africa, Thailand, United Arab Emirates, and the United States. U.S. utilization occurred during WWI when some members of the American Expeditionary Force attached to British and Australian units borrowed and used them. Merrill's Marauders used some in Burma in World War II.

Often regarded as inferior to the Mauser system in the strength of its action and its lack of gilt-edged accuracy, the Lee-Enfield proved to be one of the most “soldier proof” rifles of its day. It was reliable, extremely fast in operation, easily maintained in the field, and distributed in large numbers around the world. It surely ranks among the classic military rifles of the 20th Century.

(c) 2013 JLM


John-

Good article. I noted my editing of it in bold italics. I didn't correct for barrel length, but I think it is actually 24.25 inches, not an even 25. I'll have to check later. Some Speer reloading manuals list that. Must run errands now. I edited your article in this way to save time, for which I am pressed today. I do not know your editor's maximum word length.

I got my first .303, a Savage-made one, when I was 13 or 14. I think the same year as I got my first handgun, a Webley MK VI. I'd have been 13.

I hope this helped. Most articles on these rifles that I've read in US gun magazines have had some errors. Don't feel that you were the first to muff some things! I know of two gun writers who are just out of their league in discussing British arms. One admits that he thinks they're ugly. :rolleyes:

I do not do this editing for free: if we ever meet, you owe me a cup of coffee! (Unless the board lawyers point out that we did not have even an oral contract. :D)

I love these rifles, and well understand Clean Break's affection for his SMLE. CB, thanks for the new photos! :)

Oh: you might add that some excellent sporters were made on LE actions by BSA, LSA, and even the "Best" London custom manufacturers. These are a far cry from a Bubba job with a cut-down military stock. Note that Long Branch is two words; I changed it for you. I'm almost certain about the Chicopee FALLS location (not just Chicopee) for Savage. You can double check.
 
Last edited:
Some years back when I had multiple kids in college I decided to investigate Lee-Enfields; they were not only interesting but cheap to buy.

Got one of the #4 Mk. 2s in excellent plus condition. Early on I found that case life when full sized was about two firings. I learned from a .303 site that neck sizing with a Lee Loader (whack-a-mole) kit and keeping the brass with one rifle extended that up to 9 loadings. Also got a couple of the "sporterized #4 Mk.1s with the ATI "zytel" stocks which made one heck of a good utility rifle.

The one I like best cost the least: a "decorator" SMLE #1 Mk. III* that I paid about $39 for. Not only did it turn out to be in excellent shape with a pristine barrel, but it had an "SSA" stamp from 1917--one of the fairly rare "peddled scheme" rifles when normal sources of supply were insufficient. I often wonder where that rifle has been in its 96 years!

Naturally I had to get Skennerton's book on the Lee-Enfield. He touches on the decision to retain the rimmed cartridge circa 1898 or so rather than go rimless as the rest of the world was doing with its bolt action military rifles. The record is apparently quite silent on the subject. Apparently not to decide was to decide.

I still have a Long Branch #4 Mk.1* in dire need of a barrel--and barrels are might scarce. If anyone does have a proper barrel--or is interesed in a decent action, let me know...

Grand old rifles, though.
 
BSA Lee Enfield #3 Pattern Carbine, .303 British - YouTube

Look what I found! Here's a Lee .303 sporter by BSA. Note the shape of the buttstock and the good checkering.
This is the sort of .303 hunting rifle used by W.D.M. Bell and other early hunters and explorers in Africa.

This one has just a 20-inch barrel. Many were longer. I think the flat bolt handle on many was to make the rifle lie flatter in a saddle scabbard. hen this rifle was made, motor cars were still fairly uncommon, especially oin wild areas in Africa and other British colones.
 
Last edited:
Got one of the #4 Mk. 2s in excellent plus condition. Early on I found that case life when full sized was about two firings. I learned from a .303 site that neck sizing with a Lee Loader (whack-a-mole) kit and keeping the brass with one rifle extended that up to 9 loadings.

I still have a Long Branch #4 Mk.1* in dire need of a barrel--and barrels are might scarce. If anyone does have a proper barrel--or is interesed in a decent action, let me know...

There is another trick to extending case life. First time a new round is fired fit an O-ring around the case butting up to the rim so that the case head is being pushed firmly against the bolt face. When the round is fired and the case expands, gripping the chamber, pretty much any stretch in the brass occurs where the shoulder is blown forward. Remember that Enfields can be rather generous and variable in that area. With the case head firmly against bolt face there is no stretch in the area of the case just above the rim. When a round is fired normally, without an O-ring, there is always stretch at this location where the case has taken up the headspace.

Once a case has been fired with the O-ring trick it can be neck-resized and trimmed as described. The case is now only good for that particular rifle as its shoulder will now just contact the shoulder area of the chamber when the bolt is closed, and the case head will be in contact with the bolt face. Essentially, the case now headspaces on the shoulder instead of the rim, but ONLY for that one rifle.

IIRC a guy on gunboards used some little ring he got from Michael's, the craft store. Others have used O-rings from the Home Depot or Lowe's.

There are some issues with swapping barrels on Enfields.

1) Removing the worn barrel from the good receiver must be done very carefully or there is a real risk the receiver will get twisted. Relief cuts on the bad barrel to release it from the receiver are a good idea. BUT>>>>

2) The cut for the extractor must be made AFTER the new barrel has been test fitted, because it is almost unheard of that two barrels have the threads cut the same so that they "clock-up" identically.

3) After the above you have to get the front sight on square, and I doubt many folk own the special jig used to do that job.;)
 
During the 1990s many No. 4s manufactured in their final two years, 1955 and 1956, were imported unfired smeared with cosmoline in their factory wax paper cocoon. Like other post WWII No. 4s they have chambers dimensioned to sporting rifle standards rather than being over reamed to accept muddy cartridges. Despite their beach stocks IMO they are the most desirable SMLEs. One LGS had them for $169 plus tax including their handless knife. Not bad for a new rifle!

These were the last No.4s made in England but not the last ones ever made. The Fazakerley plant was dismantled and tooling shipped to Wah in Pakistan. This was a British attempt to level the playing field as India had inherited the factory at Ishapore.

Pakistani No.4 Mk2s are marked POF on the receiver and have observed dates from 1959 to 1963. They are distinctive in that they have heavier built stocks made from a dark wood. There are not many of them on the surplus market and most had the Ishapore screw added, suggesting they may have been captured in one of the many border skirmishes between India and Pakistan. The few available rifles suggests that Pakistan never actually sold them on the surplus market. the next paragraph gives a possible explanation why.

There is a persistent rumour that after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the US (probably the CIA) bought the No.4s still in Pakistani stores and smuggled them to the Muj. It was about that time that the US began to actively support the Pakistani regime with all kinds of US hardware. In one of his Shotgun News pieces from his time in the Spetsnaz in Afghanistan, Marco Vorobiev gave an account of a supply interdiction missionand in his list of weapons he specifically stated "Pakistani Enfields".
 
I had a Fazakerly made #4Mk1* during the '80s. It was a nice shooting gun, accurate and VERY fast.

I would be VERY surprised if it was a Fazakerley built gun marked No.4 Mk1*. To my knowledge only Savage and Long Branch produced rifles to the Mk1* standard from new. Some Maltby built No4 Mk1s were mismarked as Mk1*. If you had a Faz rifle with the same mistake it was a very rare bird indeed. Could your rifle actually have been a Mk1* rebuilt at Fazakerley when it would gained the FTR(F) mark?
 
I would be VERY surprised if it was a Fazakerley built gun marked No.4 Mk1*. To my knowledge only Savage and Long Branch produced rifles to the Mk1* standard from new. Some Maltby built No4 Mk1s were mismarked as Mk1*. If you had a Faz rifle with the same mistake it was a very rare bird indeed. Could your rifle actually have been a Mk1* rebuilt at Fazakerley when it would gained the FTR(F) mark?
I haven't seen it in almost ten years.

I didn't have any references handy when I wrote that, and was trying to keep the different mods straight in my head. If I remember correctly, the MkIIs had the trigger attached to the receiver. It might have been one of those.

You could be correct. It was a Fazakerly MARKED gun for certain.
 
The Brit rifles have always interested me in so far as the odd design and complex machining.

Haven't found an early model in the condition I'd like at an agreeable price. But I did pick up this Savage-made Mk.4No.1* or whatever it's called , in virtually unissued condition. And despite the wonky action , it is surprisingly accurate. Maybe not so surprising. It is made by Savage!



 

Latest posts

Back
Top