FBI's new 9mm ammo

I worked with quite a few FBI agents looking for a couple of robbery suspects and one incident that sticks in my mind was an agent that only had 3 rounds of oo buck for his 870 because the rest of his ammo was buried under his softball equipment in the trunk of his government vehicle. Most agents working at the FBI have no need for sidearms because they sit behind a desk and never leave the office. Everytime I was in their office no one that I saw was armed. I'll bet that all of the FBI agents combined fired less than 100 rounds last year in firefights.

20 years ago I went through the FBI's firearms instructors course that lasted a week. We were watching the so called expert show us how to shoot slugs at a full size b-27 target at 50's with an older 870 which had a 20" plain barrel with the bead on the barrel. After 5 shots, all of which missed the target, he looked dumbfounded as to why he missed. I suggetsed that he aim at the belt buckle and he hit the target all 5 times. Anyone that had used one of the older guns knew to shoot at the belt buckle because they shot high which is why Remington added a small ramp. This guy was their expert and he was a boob.

The agent teaching the class told us that the FBI used to let them have as much ammo as they wanted until someone he worked with was caught selling ammo and was given some jail time.

I am sure that somewhere in the FBI there are units that need to be armed but most don't for their everyday tasks.

DESK BOUND COMMANDOS:
Every Agency has them. They usually have the newest equipment and vehicles while the "Street Troops" make do with what comes down from Headquarters when the "Administrators" receive new issue.
 
The .40 ammo order was not for DOJ, but DHS. While in a rifle class with an FBI FI, we discussed their sidearms a bit. I did not get the impression that he was impressed with their gear and training, but he had been a real cop before and so he had a clue.

He generally recommended the authorized option (personal weapon, approved) of a G21. (Dunno if the 30 is approved; didn't think to ask.) The .45ACP is a lot easier to shoot. He had a Glock in .40, and it was not adequately reliable IMHO. It malfed a few times, as their reputation has been (a friend's agency is dealing with that now; several have been hit with crummy performance from their .40s). I suspect Glock will give them one heck of a deal, probably trading one for one on pistols and mags. The gear would not change, of course.

Remember that the purported ammo problems of the Miami shootout are almost 30 years ago, and we have gone through a lot of performance improvement in the generations of ammo since.
 
It seems that the FBI has come full circle. I remember in the early 1990's they carried the Winchester subsonic 9mm. It was a 147 grain JHP at 950 FPS. Most agencies, including mine, went with this round, but over a few years most dropped it due to poor performance. Most agencies went with lighter and faster 9mm ammo. We went with the RA9TA the 127 +P+ Ranger SXT and we are very happy with it.

Many agencies got suckered into believing that the 147JHP subsonic was great just because the FBI chose to go with load. Most people didn't (and still don't) realize that this round was designed for suppressed SMG's (MP5) and was never designed as a defensive handgun load.
 
Hi:
In 1962 when I entered Law Enforcement three Agencies that was held in high esteem was the FBI, U.S. Border Patrol, and LAPD. Most Agencies accepted their opinions of weapons, equipment, and training. In that era the FBI had training school for Police Department in different regions. I was sent to one such school in my region. I showed up with a Colt .38 Revolver and a cross draw holster. WOW, I received instant schooling in cross draw holsters are a "NO, NO" and Smith and Wesson Revolvers are a better choice as a sidearm. After the school I went to a Smith and Wesson Revolver in a Jordan style border Patrol holster.
 
Phase 3 malfunction ??? Could you explain?

The poster actually meant a "Type (class) 3 Malfunction".

Commonly known as a "Double Feed".

It occurs when the original casing is not ejected properly and the weapon tries to load another cartridge from the magazine, attempting to have the two cartridges occupy the same space.

The drill to clear it is quite involved and is usually handled by going to your BUG.

Currently the FBI is testing the S&W M&P 9mms, several Instructors made a trip out here and spent some time with us since we dropped Glocks in favor of the M&P.
 
Actually, Mike, my recollection is that what NYPD called a "phase 3" is not the same as a "type 3" (double feed). I won't swear to it. It's kind of odd, in that the only place this seems to have been a documented problem with G19 was with NYPD, and they had a hell of a time with it. Glock had to bring a mobile facility to the range to work on the pistols and they went through several efforts at repairing it. My old Gen 2 17, and my 19L worked up by Don Ellis have never done such as I recall.

Pat Rogers has described the experience and the events around it a few times. He's a member here but I almost never see him show up.
 
Actually, Mike, my recollection is that what NYPD called a "phase 3" is not the same as a "type 3" (double feed). I won't swear to it. It's kind of odd, in that the only place this seems to have been a documented problem with G19 was with NYPD, and they had a hell of a time with it. Glock had to bring a mobile facility to the range to work on the pistols and they went through several efforts at repairing it. My old Gen 2 17, and my 19L worked up by Don Ellis have never done such as I recall.

Pat Rogers has described the experience and the events around it a few times. He's a member here but I almost never see him show up.

In the Glock, the Phase / Type / Class 3 Malfunction, is still a double feed.
The spent casing, without enough "power" to eject fully, stays in the weapon as the new round is stripped from the magazine.
The casing, still stuck in the extractor, rides forward over the new round and lodges firmly on the bbl hood.
As you've stated, I too have never seen it repeated. Oh well.
 

Attachments

  • download.jpg
    download.jpg
    2.7 KB · Views: 7,496
In the Glock, the Phase / Type / Class 3 Malfunction, is still a double feed.
The spent casing, without enough "power" to eject fully, stays in the weapon as the new round is stripped from the magazine.
The casing, still stuck in the extractor, rides forward over the new round and lodges firmly on the bbl hood.
As you've stated, I too have never seen it repeated. Oh well.

Bingo. Of course, NYPD supposedly would have none of the "it's the Indian & not the arrow" pep talk and threw a hissy fit according to industry insiders at the time as well as threatened to drop Glock like an ugly blind date. Obviously, Glock was not wanting to lose a huge contract like that with lots of PR factor, so they "powdered" the baby's bottom. It was in the Gen 2 G19's which came out in '88.


I've owned a couple of the Gen 2 G19's and had a similar problem with one using weak Win. WB ammo back in the day. Solution: changed to better (hotter) ammo and the issue was resolved. Many fail to remember that when Glock first hit the U.S. shore in early '86 the Gen 1 G17 had an 18 or 19 lbs. RSA that was made for European NATO spec ammo and not watered down U.S. range fodder. As well, the first lots had a really tight spec chamber and some Fed. American Eagle I had wouldn't chamber. Again, tight Teutonic specs vs. sloppy U.S. specs. They opened the chamber specs as a result. The RSA nowadays is rated 17 lbs. for the G17.
 
...

It's not 1990. Things have changed.

Oh, Man... say it ain't so!:cool:


MC_Hammer_gif1_zpsc66b7cc6.gif
 
If the FBI has the funds to purchase new weapons every few years then the budget need to be readjusted, downward. There is no reason for any agency to need new weapons so often. This is one of the reasons this country is in the fiscal shape we are in.
 
I doubt very much they are paying much if anything for the pistols. Major manufacturers do a lot of special deals to get major LE agencies to use their weapons. Also, depending on the platform and training level, a 10 year service life could be a lot to expect. (AFAIK, FBI does not shoot at that level.)
 
Bad training and no performance standards for trainees or trainers. I've seen plenty of window lickers in both groups.
 
I have a lot of time dealing with the FBI locally and how they get anything done is beyond me. Its a bloated, antiquated, self-serving bureaucracy with the exception of some exceptional individuals. Hanging around the FBI Academy for six courses two weeks a crack gave me good behind the scenes look at the paper jungle.

I vividly recall how the 147 sub-sonic was all the rage circa 1991 when we went to Glocks. I was not convinced and was proven right when two officers were nearly killed because of the pitiful 147 subsonic. We went right to Glock .40's with Gold Dot 165gr.

I have some very strong opinions about the FBI ammo testing protocol and the Miami shootout that created it. I feel the FBI management could not admit their training and tactics were ***** so the Win Silver Tip became the scapegoat.

What puzzles me is the reverence the FBI ammo tests get. I'm even more puzzled (actually I'm not) why the FBI refuses to incorporate the Border Patrol's desired changes to the testing protocol. The average Border Patrol officer has a far greater chance of a deadly force incident than any FBI agent. I'm sure the BP has more shootings too but these stats for the FBI are impossible to find via Google.

It boils down the arrogant attitude that's ingrained within the FBI. They know what's best for those lowly street cops and Border Patrol officers who just operate off locker room rumor. As one new FBI recruit told me, "I'm with the FBI, the premier law enforcement agency in the world". Whatever...:rolleyes:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top