I use the Governor for what it is: a hallway home defense pistol and a snake gun outside. No complaints.
I suspect the problem is that it's a slow seller, not a hot seller. As a result S&W is making smaller batches of these revolvers to insure they won't have unsold stock on hand. End result is that demand is higher than what is produced.
As for why I think it's a slow seller, when S&W entered this market they were going into a segment that had been established by Taurus and it's really difficult to "steal" market share unless the originator starts putting out items with distinctly sub standard quality. That hasn't happened and Taurus actually has built a pretty good reputation with the Judge.
Fine for fun/novelty, but it's simply not a practical, effective weapon for self-defense. They are marketed to those who don't know the difference. I'm not aware of any reputable defense instructors that recommends them for serious defense purposes and for good reason.
Massad Ayoob nails it.... Smith & Wesson Governor/Taurus Judge viable for home defense? | Glock Talk
Fine for fun/novelty, but it's simply not a practical, effective weapon for self-defense. They are marketed to those who don't know the difference. I'm not aware of any reputable defense instructors that recommends them for serious defense purposes and for good reason.
Massad Ayoob nails it.... Smith & Wesson Governor/Taurus Judge viable for home defense? | Glock Talk
The Governor could work in a defense scenario, but the same could be said about any gun or a sock full of quarters. Folks are free to choose what they wish, but not all choices are equally viable. IMO, the Governor meets the textbook definition of a "novelty" and should be considered as such if finding the most practical and effective tool for the gravely serious business of personal self-defense is the goal. One of the most glaring problems with the Governor is that by designing it to chamber .410 shotgun shells, you profoundly impact it's ability to effectively chamber .45 colt/,45 ACP. and what you end up with is an extremly large, inaccurate snubnose revolver which does nothing well.
From Grant Cunningham... I still think a .410 revolver is silly. – www.GrantCunningham.com
I don't understand why some of you expend so much energy trashing a revolver you don't even own.
It would be a pretty boring life if we all liked the same things.
The Governor could work in a defense scenario, but the same could be said about any gun or a sock full of quarters. Folks are free to choose what they wish, but not all choices are equally viable. IMO, the Governor meets the textbook definition of a "novelty" and should be considered as such if finding the most practical and effective tool for the gravely serious business of personal self-defense is the goal. One of the most glaring problems with the Governor is that by designing it to chamber .410 shotgun shells, you profoundly impact it's ability to effectively chamber .45 colt/,45 ACP. and what you end up with is an extremly large, inaccurate snubnose revolver which does nothing well.
From Grant Cunningham... I still think a .410 revolver is silly. – www.GrantCunningham.com
I imagine he's going on the lack of pertinent data - I've never heard of anyone using either a Taurus Judge or Smith & Wesson Governor in any situation, with any type of ammunition.
I've done my own ballistic testing with synthetic gelatin. I realize that gelatin tests are quite limited. It's homogeneous, no bone or varying degrees of viscosity from the various tissues. That said, I've been fairly pleased with the penetration of the defensive .410 rounds.
My goal is only to stop an attacker, not necessarily to kill...
For fun, collecting etc., it doesn't matter.
However, if we are talking about choosing a gun to be used for self-defense where lives are stake, then making informed and sensible choices becomes critical.
For fun, collecting etc., it doesn't matter.
However, if we are talking about choosing a gun to be used for self-defense where lives are stake, then making informed and sensible choices becomes critical.
I realize that the Governor doesn't have a track record. I do respect the opinions of the naysayers. I have chosen a Governor for my own reasons.
For me, mitigating a threat includes using intimidation. I also want to increase my odds of hitting what I'm shooting at.
Any firearm is capable of self-defense. Which particular facet of the Governor/Judge makes it less than worthy? Revolver? Snub nose? Ugly? .410 caliber?