Custom Built .50 BMG mag fed Mauser style bolt action - By Fred Wells

THREEDFLYER

THREEDFLYER

Member
Silver Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2009
Messages
2,969
Reaction score
10,164
Location
Pound, WI
Holy cow!! I have never seen such a beast! Looks almost like an over-sized toy model.....look at it compared to the M500 S&W laying in front of it!

This is the real deal and fully functional, and the action is 44% larger than a standard Mauser action.

Every piece of this rifle was custom made.....ALL OF IT!

Enjoy!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0762.jpg
    IMG_0762.jpg
    53.3 KB · Views: 486
  • IMG_0763.jpg
    IMG_0763.jpg
    70.8 KB · Views: 531
  • IMG_0764.jpg
    IMG_0764.jpg
    97.6 KB · Views: 468
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I admire that it looks great! It shouldn't be a surprise that the 50 BMG cartridge would work well in the Mauser controlled feed system of operation. After all, the proportions remind one of the 30-40 Krag, and the various Mauser family of metric cartridges.
That wood looks pretty awesome, too. If it's as well made as it looks, I'd be interested in knowing how it was inletted and bedded... That's a heck of a lot of recoil for a wood stock!

Just my grumpy guy opinion, but, too many 50 BMGs look like they were made from iron pipe offcuts, welded together in a high school metal shop, then spray painted black.

Somewhere I read about a European gunmaker who built a double barrel/double bolt hunting rifle, out of titanium yet (!), that was chambered for a Nitro Express cartridge.
The maker was Fuchs & Szecsei:.... Apparently, Joseph Szecsei was once charged by three elephants and decided that neither a double rifle nor a bolt action was quite enough gun...

Fine Guns - Fuchs Fine Guns

Thanks for the eye candy!
Jim
 
Last edited:
I too wonder whether or not the stock will split upon firing. Even with the rifle's mass, if it isn't heavy enough, that rifle is likely to kill at both ends.
 
It is a beautiful piece of gunsmithing art.

However, it might require unusual deer hunting strategy. Before pulling the trigger you press its recoil pad firmly against the deer. That should knock them down faster than a .30-30.
 
Last edited:
All I could think of was this video...

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkgfrS9FanU"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkgfrS9FanU[/ame]
 
Pisgah said:
Looks like a baby next to this one:

Mauser 1918 T-Gewehr - Wikipedia

As to the .50 looking like the .30-40, actually it is a scaled-up .30-06.
Click to expand...

Yes, thanks for making that correction. For some reason, the empty BMG case sitting here looked to have a more pronounced body taper than the 30-06. Reminded me, perhaps incorrectly, of the 303 British, sans the rim.

Vonn [oops, Pisgah, another mistake!], it's interesting you posted that link to the anti-tank Mauser. On a parallel thread there's a discussion going on about favorite snubbies (M36 vs M10 vs Colt Detective). One of the posts shows a Boys anti-tank rifle being shot off of what looks to be a lake float.
Odd that two iconic anti-tank rifles should be mentioned, both somewhat of a digression from the OP topic.

Thanks!
Jim
 
Last edited:
federali said:
I too wonder whether or not the stock will split upon firing. Even with the rifle's mass, if it isn't heavy enough, that rifle is likely to kill at both ends.
Click to expand...

The stock should be fine if it is built right. Barrel looks short enough that it is going to lose some muzzle velocity, and recoil. Suspect muzzle energy would be about the same as a 4 bore. Those always have wood stocks. I put a couple steel rod through the wrist when building one.

These things have more than enough recoil to break stocks. They can break bones pretty easy also. Need to use the proper technique for shooting this sort of thing.

50 BMG hunting rifle is not my sort of thing, but its always great to see this sort of work being done.
 
During WW II Mauser made an anti tank magazine fed bolt action with their version of the 50 BMG. Pictures and story are in Ludwig Olson's book!
 
6string said:
Yes, thanks for making that correction. For some reason, the empty BMG case sitting here looked to have a more pronounced body taper than the 30-06. Reminded me, perhaps incorrectly, of the 303 British, sans the rim.

Vonn, it's interesting you posted that link to the anti-tank Mauser. On a parallel thread there's a discussion going on about favorite snubbies (M36 vs M10 vs Colt Detective). One of the posts shows a Boys anti-tank rifle being shot off of what looks to be a lake float.
Odd that two iconic anti-tank rifles should be mentioned, both somewhat of a digression from the OP topic.

Thanks!
Jim
Click to expand...

Piegan was the poster of the Mauser
 
Bakebfr480 said:
During WW II Mauser made an anti tank magazine fed bolt action with their version of the 50 BMG. Pictures and story are in Ludwig Olson's book!
Click to expand...

And you can see Mae from "Small Arms of WWI Primer" firing one of them if you surf the net.
 

Attachments

  • The.story_.of_.a.gal_.a.huge_.rifle_.and_.a.passion.for_.Curios.and_.Relics.VIDEO_..1.jpg
    The.story_.of_.a.gal_.a.huge_.rifle_.and_.a.passion.for_.Curios.and_.Relics.VIDEO_..1.jpg
    265.9 KB · Views: 84
Fred Wells built more than a few Mauser 98 rifle actions from scratch. Most were for very large cartridges. He then made them with any of the best of the Mauser Sporter frills such as square bridge(s), any length needed,etc. Even LH. His wife Rachel did most of the engraving on his projects.
These were all working guns,,not just something to display. A large portion of his customers were SCI types and the guns were built w/a purpose. He had his own Wells Express line of wildcats based on the 577N/E too. He liked those big bores!

Fred often had an assistant gunsmith, sometimes 2, working with him in his later years. Not an apprentice as such, but usually someone with the knowledge and skills already well along. I think Jim Coffy (sp?) was the one who help out on the 50BMG Mauser 98 project.

What a great experience those times must have been to work with and learn from one of the best gunsmiths and machinest around. He spanned the time of EK and O'Connor building guns for them and others and working right up to the Y2K.

Fred died about 10 or 12 years ago. His guns are very much a desirable item especially the bench made Mausers.
 
Beautiful workmanship, I would be curious as to how much that rifle weighs. The recoil on an AR50 is not unpleasant but it weighs 34 pounds. Unless that thing is a lot heavier than it looks, I wouldn't care to fire it.
 
The one club I belong to used to have a military/machine gun shoot once a year. Ed bought a 50 bolt action rifle, it weighed about 50 pounds. It had a big muzzle break on it and standing by it to watch someone shoot it, the percussion from the break was brutal. Anyone could shoot it, cost 2.00 a round to shoot. I took 2 shots with it, was close to shooting a 12 gauge shotgun with rifle slugs. Shooting it was better than watching someone shoot it. Had a scope on it and the target was a bowling pin at 200 yards. It was fun and would do it again.

The gun it this thread is nice. Being all custom made, the price has to be very high. He was known to make rifles for hunting in Africa. Tom, thanks for sharing this with us. Larry
 
I once saw a deactivated 20mm rifle, that was built as an anti tank weapon. Think from someone Scandinavian country, had a ski on the bipod. Monster gun.

Love the Mauser 50 BMG
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
1916 Mauser .308
2
Replies
23
Views
1K
Gazz
G
VictorLouis
The hand-built illegal gun trade in Philippines
Replies
8
Views
767
THE PILGRIM
THE PILGRIM
Glenn R. McMannly
Mauser 98 vs Lee-Enfield
2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
cruiserdan
cruiserdan
P
Mauser HSc. New to me
2
Replies
22
Views
637
JohnRippert
JohnRippert
tlawler
Picked up a Reeves Jungkind built DAO Python today **range report post #20**
2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
Baxter6551
Baxter6551

Latest posts

Back
Top