Speer Gold Dot Short Barrel 135 Grain +P

What do you guys recommend for self-defense in a Smith & Wesson 642 Airweight — Buffalo Bore 150 grain standard pressure wadcutters or Speer Gold Dot 135 grain +P? I’ve been carrying the Gold Dots for years, but I recently saw a few review videos claiming they don’t expand reliably out of a snub-nose.
I have been using rim flush classic 148 grain full wadcutters in my snubbies since the late 1960’s. I was in LE 36 years and have a Smith pack up along regularly. Still carry a Smith 342 in a De Santis ankle holster daily. Have an old 37 and a newer 642 as well. All are loaded with 148 wadcutters. They have three distinct advantages. #1. They don’t require expansion and hit hard like a flat rock. And while velocity is an important factor in stopping power, a 1 7/8” barrel isn’t going to get you much no matter what you use. #2. Because they use very fast burning powders, muzzle blast is almost non-existent. A huge advantage in darkness. #3. They shoot to the sights. Of my three guns, they each hit where I sight them. Plus p’s don’t. Yes, not a big deal at three feet, but considerable at 7 yards, and dramatically worse a 15 or more. Jim
 
Buffalo Bore has a standard pressure short barrel 38 Spl. Uses a Barnes 110 gr bullet at about 1000 fps. A little pricey but hey, what is your life worth.
When I tested them in a Colt Agent and S&W 642, they expand reliably above 1000 fps but seldom do more than “pooch out their lips” at velocities under that. So chronograph them in your carry gun before you bet your life on them. We were getting 50-50 results on expansion with that BB 20G load.
 
I have found that the best SD JHP load in my M49 snub nose in all my testing, is the
130 gr Federal HST ammo. If you want lead, the old FBI load works.
Yes, but...the 130 gr. HST ammo hasn't been seen (at least locally) for ages. I bought a box for my buddy's birthday, but haven't seen any for a long time. It is no longer in the Federal catalog. I think they must have decided to go with the HST Deep bullets.
I went from Remington 158 gr. LSWCHP+P (FBI load?) to Golden Saber 125gr. +P and finally settled on the Speer 135 gr. SB +P, which seems to appear locally on or about the 14th full moon of the year. ;) And NOBODY on line ever has any. Woops...just saw the post that mentions Midway USA has them in stock! $33/box +Hazmat+Shipping. Maybe free ship for 3 boxes. Hmmmmm...
In one of my Speer manuals, (#13 or 14) they have Short Barrel data, and a photo of the bullet's expansion at iirc, 860 fps. from a 2 or 2 1/4" barrel. A Speer Tech told me I could expect ~920 fps from my 4".
 
Last edited:
My go-to's are Federal HSTs, Remington Golden Sabers and Speer Gold Dots. All of these have done well in any tests that I've seen, even out of a 2" barrel. I put Hogue or Pachmayr grips on my 'J' frames.

I'm curious about the Lehigh 'Philips headd' ammo and I think it's very promising, but the final word isn't in yet. I seriously considering using it for .380 ACP because of the penetration/expanding problem. Right now there are only a few types of ammo I'll use in a .380.
 
Just found some chrono data for this ammo. From my M49, it went 850 fps; from my 3" M64-6, it went 912 fps. I need to chrono it in two other revolvers I use it in - a 4" M10-5 (it shouldn't shoot to POA in this gun, but it does) and a 4" M67-1. I don't use it in the 49 and 64, they were just the guns I had with me when I was chronographing. They both need 148-158-grain ammo to shoot to POA.
 
If you bothered to go to the manual that came along with the firearm, under the ammunition section, there are numerous warnings pertaining to proper ammunition. Smith and Wesson cannot possibly see the ammunition you were using, nor did you mention anything about the ammunition you were using, nor the circumstances when the firearm, as you said, "Blew up in my hand firing 38 specials." Factory ammunition is loaded below any pressure limits because manufacturers do not have any control over what firearm you will be shooting it in. S&W also specifically states not to shoot reloaded ammunition in their firearms. The fact that the ammo you were using blew up your 642 indicates that you were not shooting ammunition that was in accordance with their guidance or warranty. Thus you did not follow the guidance in the firearms manual so there was no reason for them to do anything about your issue. That made the issue entirely yours, not theirs.
Dude - I was using Remington Factory .38 specials in a brand-new S&W .357 revolver. My advice Never buy a new S&W!
 
If you bothered to go to the manual that came along with the firearm, under the ammunition section, there are numerous warnings pertaining to proper ammunition. Smith and Wesson cannot possibly see the ammunition you were using, nor did you mention anything about the ammunition you were using, nor the circumstances when the firearm, as you said, "Blew up in my hand firing 38 specials." Factory ammunition is loaded below any pressure limits because manufacturers do not have any control over what firearm you will be shooting it in. S&W also specifically states not to shoot reloaded ammunition in their firearms. The fact that the ammo you were using blew up your 642 indicates that you were not shooting ammunition that was in accordance with their guidance or warranty. Thus you did not follow the guidance in the firearms manual so there was no reason for them to do anything about your issue. That made the issue entirely yours, not theirs.
Amen, brother.
 
Dude - I was using Remington Factory .38 specials in a brand-new S&W .357 revolver. My advice Never buy a new S&W!
So, why aren’t you badmouthing Remington ammunition, Dude?

There are only three possible persons potentially responsible for the mishap: 1) the gun maker, 2) the ammo maker, or 3) you. It appears that, for some reason, two of those potentially responsible persons have been ruled out, with the focus now being only on No. 1. The reason for that had better be a good one.
 
Last edited:
The bottom end of the r
In my S&W 442, 637, and Taurus 856, I carry Remington Golden Saber 125gr +P. They are designed to reliably expand from a snubnose revolver.
The low end of the 125 grain REM .38 Spl Golden Saber extreme velocity spread is high enough to expand every time. I’ve tested seven different lot numbers over the last 20 years. The advertised velocity from a 4-inch revolver is 975 fps. I’ve never had one go through my Colt Agent’s 2 in barrel below 867 fps. I shoot them through gallon water/milk jugs after a layer of sweat shirt and denim. All expanded to .53-.63” And every denim covered gel tests I can find show 12-13” of penetration.
 
Outstanding quote "bullet placement is King, bullet penetratition is Queen and everything else is Angel's dancing on head of a pin". Says it all.. Been carrying the old FBI load in 640PD for 20+yrs. Hope to never find how it performs!
 
Dude - I was using Remington Factory .38 specials in a brand-new S&W .357 revolver. My advice Never buy a new S&W!

I'm sorry to hear that. Have you contacted Remington with the lot number of the ammo?

There is no way the gun blew up at factory ammo pressures.

I have a friend that has a bad Winchester factory load and after providing proof and the weapon they covered his firearm replacement cost.

I am still not sure how Smith and wesson has anything to do with this. A hot factory load and hot reload exceeds the fiream pressure so it would not be their fault

Still need more details. What exactly did they say? Did they inspect the firearm? What was their conclusion?


Do you have photos of the revolver? You must if you corresponded with the manufacturer. I would love to see the damage.


This story is just so absent of actual details.
 
The use of WC ammo for defense is not new, just rehashed. In 1969 using wadcutters was espoused by some gurus for SD & LE. Some touted using HB wadcutters seated backwards, I saw something like that advertised recently like it was a new cure for cancer. I still use the 158 gr SWC HP +P as it is what I was "raised on". Used it, still works.
The "Chicago Load" or the "FBI Load" was the issue round for most of the time I spent with Chicago PD (1965-1995). The +P round was required for steel medium framed revolvers, and the non +P round for small frame and alloy framed revolvers. For a short time the same round in non HP configuration was issued. I use the "Nyclad" version of HP or SCW, like it a lot. For 9mm Super Vel was the way to go, similar 9mm rounds still are IMHO. The Super Vel was a 90 or 110 gr copper jacked HP which really moved out, 1200 actual fps, IIRC. Made quite a flash also. Of course the semi auto handguns of the day were a little problematical. The Model 39 came out with the Illinois State Police in 1967, replaced by the Model 59 a few years later. I felt the Browning HP was the best 9mm back then, still do. Super Vel also produced some real fire breathing 38/357 rounds, quite literally fire breathing. Same formula, lightweight JHP moving out at serious velocity
Chicago cops carried 6 rounds in the gun and 6 in a dump pouch (the operative word is "dump"), For a while some bosses enforced the "only 12 rounds rule" strictly. The ISP were authorized to carry only one spare magazine in a pouch on the cross draw holster, and they enforced that rule very strictly for a time. That changed when a trooper saved his and several other lives because he had a "bootleg" extra magazine with him and the fight exceeded the capacity of his M39 and extra magazine. He got a medal and a written reprimand at the same time, then they changed the rule. I just carried an extra dump pouch which could be slipped off and pocketed when the Inspector was around.
Don't remember who said it, but: "Bullet placement is King, penetration is Queen, everything else is angels dancing on the head of a pin".
I believe it.
I have seen a lot of folks shot with small calibers fall over dead, and many shot several times with the biggest and heaviest loads keep on being seriously anti social. For a while. Sometimes, quite a while.
There are so many variables, particularly these days with so much drug use, and so many crazy folks around, including some very high ardrenalin. I believe those factors do affect how people respond to getting shot.
I am starting to think that ones' social agenda may produce some very high chemical responses, of course I could be wrong. I was wrong once, but then I realized I was mistaken.
I am an old guy, I get to ramble...
What kind of boss would enforce limited ammo?
 
I prefer to use the short barrel 135's , but with NY's ammo buying laws I have been shooting what I have (not tons, but a small amount a few times a week) so I've been shooting and carrying Blazer 125 +p JHP in my "j" frames and Model 10. They've got a bit of energy behind them. I've never had to shoot any person or animal with them, but I think they would help me out in an emergency
 
Well if the bullet doesn’t expand, I’d imagine a flat nose would do a bit more damage than a round nose profile.
Does your Department have a issue Duty Round?

Back in my day we had to carry what was issued and that was the .38 Special 158 grain Lead Round Nose and it put down criminals.
 
The use of WC ammo for defense is not new, just rehashed. In 1969 using wadcutters was espoused by some gurus for SD & LE.
I am an old guy, I get to ramble...
Captain with 60+ years of experience and service you get to ramble. Lots of great stuff you know. Thank you for sharing, Sarge
 
… They both need 148-158-grain ammo to shoot to POA.
The Kimber K6xs is a two inch six shooter rated for .38 Special +P and they designed it to shoot POA with 125 to 135 grain bullets.

I highly recommend the Kimber and it is very similar to the Colt Detective Special and uses the same speedloader.
 
I wouldn’t use a .380 ACP at all JMHO
I prefer 9mm all the way and right now I don't have any problems that would preclude using 9mm/.38 or bigger. Missus Smiff, however, has hand strength problems and the .380 EZ is good for her. She's good with it, too. She put a hole in the middle of the target and proceeded to put make a ragged hole in the middle. The instructor said that if we ran into trouble, I should give her the gun. :LOL: Believe me, I worked hard to come up with three brands of ammo that I trust to perform well. She has also been instructed to KEEP FIRING until the threat is stopped. Also, the .380 is the cartridge that I'm most interested in the Lehigh 'philips head'bullets, because of problems with penetration/expansion. Like all other pistol ammo, the .380 has benefitted from improvements, but I realize that it's still an 'iffy' SD choice.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top