Speer Gold Dot Short Barrel 135 Grain +P

BlueLineNYPD

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2015
Messages
26
Reaction score
19
What do you guys recommend for self-defense in a Smith & Wesson 642 Airweight — Buffalo Bore 150 grain standard pressure wadcutters or Speer Gold Dot 135 grain +P? I’ve been carrying the Gold Dots for years, but I recently saw a few review videos claiming they don’t expand reliably out of a snub-nose.
 
Register to hide this ad
I use the Speer 135gr Gold Dot Short Barrel +P load as it was the last duty issue revolver ammo for the NYPD. The NYPD had good results with this load and I do not think that any miscreant in Virginia is going to be built differently than the miscreants in NYC.
Yes and they still use Speer Gold Dots in their 9mm’s. Great round in a 4” barrel, just not sure about the expansion in a 2”
 
There are a number of gurus in the training and writing scene who are now advocating wadcutters for short barrels - because while they don’t expand, they cut and penetrate evenly. I haven’t seen the GD short barrel loads on shelves for ages. I personally have some Federal 158 grain +p lead SWHPs for my .38s, but don’t really carry them right now. They say the specs for wadcutters should be 750 - 800 fps minimum to achieve what is necessary. Buffalo Bore and Atlanta Arms make wadcutters that meet they criteria. The reason for the experts advocation is that none of the hollow points expand or penetrate as reliably as needed.
 
What do you guys recommend for self-defense in a Smith & Wesson 642 Airweight — Buffalo Bore 150 grain standard pressure wadcutters or Speer Gold Dot 135 grain +P? I’ve been carrying the Gold Dots for years, but I recently saw a few review videos claiming they don’t expand reliably out of a snub-nose.
Reliable expansion is controlled by velocity. If the bullet is not traveling with enough velocity to cause the expansion then don't expect a hollow point to work. Snub nose handguns are notorious for low muzzle velocity. +P ammo will not help because powder burned after the bullet leaves the barrel does nothing but cause muzzle flash with no gain in velocity. Check the barrel length that the ammo was tested at. All are 4 inches. Cut half or more off the length of the barrel and you can expect a large decrease in muzzle velocity, thus not enough velocity to cause reliable expansion. If you are shooting a 2 inch or less snubbie you might as well shoot flat points, at least you know what you are dealing with.
 
There are a number of gurus in the training and writing scene who are now advocating wadcutters for short barrels - because while they don’t expand, they cut and penetrate evenly. I haven’t seen the GD short barrel loads on shelves for ages. I personally have some Federal 158 grain +p lead SWHPs for my .38s, but don’t really carry them right now. They say the specs for wadcutters should be 750 - 800 fps minimum to achieve what is necessary. Buffalo Bore and Atlanta Arms make wadcutters that meet they criteria. The reason for the experts advocation is that none of the hollow points expand or penetrate as reliably as needed.
That’s exactly why I asked the question. The newer wadcutters have much more of a punch than the standard target wadcutters. In fact, the Buffalo Bore 150gr standard pressure rounds supposedly penetrate up to 16 inches, which may be too much in some situations. Georgia Arms makes a 148gr round made for snubs that supposedly just meets the FBI standard of 12” penetration and has very little recoil.
 
I have found that the best SD JHP load in my M49 snub nose in all my testing, is the
130 gr Federal HST ammo. If you want lead, the old FBI load works.
 
Reliable expansion is controlled by velocity. If the bullet is not traveling with enough velocity to cause the expansion then don't expect a hollow point to work. Snub nose handguns are notorious for low muzzle velocity. +P ammo will not help because powder burned after the bullet leaves the barrel does nothing but cause muzzle flash with no gain in velocity. Check the barrel length that the ammo was tested at. All are 4 inches. Cut half or more off the length of the barrel and you can expect a large decrease in muzzle velocity, thus not enough velocity to cause reliable expansion. If you are shooting a 2 inch or less snubbie you might as well shoot flat points, at least you know what you are dealing with.
Speer says that the velocity from a 2” barrel is approximately 860–900 fps with 12” to 13.5” of penetration but I’ve seen many videos stating otherwise.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8714.jpeg
    IMG_8714.jpeg
    101.2 KB · Views: 0
There are a number of gurus in the training and writing scene who are now advocating wadcutters for short barrels - because while they don’t expand, they cut and penetrate evenly. I haven’t seen the GD short barrel loads on shelves for ages. I personally have some Federal 158 grain +p lead SWHPs for my .38s, but don’t really carry them right now. They say the specs for wadcutters should be 750 - 800 fps minimum to achieve what is necessary. Buffalo Bore and Atlanta Arms make wadcutters that meet they criteria. The reason for the experts advocation is that none of the hollow points expand or penetrate as reliably as needed.

There are a number of gurus in the training and writing scene who are now advocating wadcutters for short barrels - because while they don’t expand, they cut and penetrate evenly. I haven’t seen the GD short barrel loads on shelves for ages. I personally have some Federal 158 grain +p lead SWHPs for my .38s, but don’t really carry them right now. They say the specs for wadcutters should be 750 - 800 fps minimum to achieve what is necessary. Buffalo Bore and Atlanta Arms make wadcutters that meet they criteria. The reason for the experts advocation is that none of the hollow points expand or penetrate as reliably as needed.
 
Back
Top