I've been thinking about this from a human behavior standpoint.
Every Fourth of July, thousands of illegal mortar fireworks go off across Virginia. They're not legally sold here, yet people still get them. During Prohibition, banning alcohol didn't eliminate demand—it created moonshine and bootlegging.
I'm not saying fireworks, alcohol, and firearms are the same. They're not.
My point is simpler: laws don't automatically eliminate demand. When people strongly want something, many will buy it before a ban, get it elsewhere, or ignore the law if they believe enforcement is unlikely.
It seems that any serious discussion about firearm bans should consider not only what the law says, but also how people actually behave.
Every Fourth of July, thousands of illegal mortar fireworks go off across Virginia. They're not legally sold here, yet people still get them. During Prohibition, banning alcohol didn't eliminate demand—it created moonshine and bootlegging.
I'm not saying fireworks, alcohol, and firearms are the same. They're not.
My point is simpler: laws don't automatically eliminate demand. When people strongly want something, many will buy it before a ban, get it elsewhere, or ignore the law if they believe enforcement is unlikely.
It seems that any serious discussion about firearm bans should consider not only what the law says, but also how people actually behave.

