|
|
01-14-2012, 12:05 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 11,076
Liked 10,925 Times in 3,295 Posts
|
|
Adjusting load for fixed sights
I own an unusual handgun; a Model 1883 German Reichsrevolver. It is chambered for the 10.6mm Service Ordnance caliber, which is nearly identical, and completely interchangeable, with the .44 Russian.
The original 10.6mm Service Ordnance fired a 262 grain lead bullet at 700 fps with black powder. The .44 Russian load is a 246 grain lead bullet at about 750 fps with black powder. My load for the gun is a 205 grain cast lead bullet at 690 fps with a 3.5 grain charge of Bullseye (no, it is perfectly safe, and easy on the gun). The problem I have is that my loads shoot about 6" high at 25 yards. Does anyone know if there is a way to lower the point of impact to it shoots closer to point of aim? There is no way I am going to file on the sights or modify the gun in any way.
Here is a picture of my revolver, and another of 44 Russian, 44 Special, and 44 Magnum next to each other for reference.
Thanks.
|
01-14-2012, 12:21 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: middle Ga.
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 211
Liked 610 Times in 301 Posts
|
|
Generally, on a handgun, you increase velocity to lower point of impact.
Some of the old military revolvers had sights regulated for crazy long ranges. Have you shot yours with original service loadings?
|
01-14-2012, 12:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lafayette, Tennessee
Posts: 6,925
Likes: 6,833
Liked 8,936 Times in 2,910 Posts
|
|
More powder. Handguns, at least in my experience, shoot lower as velocity increases. This is backwards from rifles, that tend to shoot higher as velocity increases.
|
01-14-2012, 01:07 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: west coast
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 34 Posts
|
|
Any attempts to lower the point of impact by increasing the velocity of that bullet means increasing the powder charge and the chamber pressure. What this means is that your previous stated "perfectly safe" load of 3.5 grains Bullseye will be increased to possibly (PROBABLY) unsafe levels. Please remember that these revolvers were made for black powder loads only, and gun steel was only modestly strong enough for black powder pressures.
It might be a good idea to switch to black powder loads, or use black epoxy to temporarily build up the front sight for zeroing with your loads. Such a modification is not permanent and certainly would not put your gun at risk with higher power loads.
|
01-14-2012, 02:33 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 6,297
Likes: 8,837
Liked 7,791 Times in 2,379 Posts
|
|
Or try lighter bullets..
Heavier/slower = higher
Lighter/faster = lower
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
|
01-14-2012, 02:51 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 30
Liked 700 Times in 392 Posts
|
|
The tried-and-true method is called "Kentucky windage."
Correctly applied, you align the sights and aim to a point which will put your shots on target, equal and opposite to the difference between point of aim and point of impact. It is a mistake to deliberately misalign the sights - it is neither consistent nor accurate.
There are too many variations in grip, environment and ability of the shooter, to hope that the "right" load is going to fix things. Load and practice for consistency, and accuracy will follow in due course.
|
01-14-2012, 06:01 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 10
Liked 78 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Aim 6" low?
The traditional way without altering the gun, as stated, is to lower bullet weight or increase velocity. You are already at a light bullet weight and increasing velocity by increasing the charge may not be a viable safe option.
I don't know if another powder that will give you equivalent pressures and will be safe, but if I may recommend a couple that could possibly do it better than Bullseye, I would suggest Trail Boss or possibly 5744. I have heard of the latter being used in reduced loads for revolver cartridges, specifically the 44 Russian, to duplicate BP loads. You may want to talk to their ballistician directly if you can't find reliable load data for it. They are pretty helpful.
IMHO, either of those powders seem a safer option in your old revolver than Bullseye. One double charge and it's done. Both TB and 5744 are fairly forgiving as long as you don't compress them.
Edit: For safety purposes, I have linked a discussion that may be of some interest to you here Paco Kelly's Leverguns.com • View topic - Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders . I am also reminded that 4759 powder is not a bad substitute for BP loads either. I am a big fan of Sherman Bell's discussions of its use in sound quality but old Damascus barrel shotguns that he produced a series of articles for in Double Gun Journal. I found the discussion of TB to be most interesting, btw.
__________________
" I said, good DAY! "
Last edited by VAdoublegunner; 01-14-2012 at 06:31 AM.
Reason: additional info
|
01-14-2012, 01:51 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: arkansas
Posts: 236
Likes: 4
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Yep, lighter bullets or more velocity. I myself go with the Kentucky Windage to get them where I want. The good side of Kentucky windage is if someone gets your gun and shoots at you they'll miss. I know this never ever happened with dualing guns, yeah right.
|
01-15-2012, 11:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 11,076
Liked 10,925 Times in 3,295 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by m1gunner
...Some of the old military revolvers had sights regulated for crazy long ranges. Have you shot yours with original service loadings?
|
No, I have never even seen an original cartridge in this caliber. I would imagine they would be fairly expensive.
|
01-15-2012, 11:31 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 11,076
Liked 10,925 Times in 3,295 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregintenn
More powder. Handguns, at least in my experience, shoot lower as velocity increases. This is backwards from rifles, that tend to shoot higher as velocity increases.
|
More power is not an option for me in this old revolver.
|
01-15-2012, 11:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 11,076
Liked 10,925 Times in 3,295 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by john traveler
Any attempts to lower the point of impact by increasing the velocity of that bullet means increasing the powder charge and the chamber pressure. What this means is that your previous stated "perfectly safe" load of 3.5 grains Bullseye will be increased to possibly (PROBABLY) unsafe levels. Please remember that these revolvers were made for black powder loads only, and gun steel was only modestly strong enough for black powder pressures.
It might be a good idea to switch to black powder loads, or use black epoxy to temporarily build up the front sight for zeroing with your loads. Such a modification is not permanent and certainly would not put your gun at risk with higher power loads.
|
I have been reluctant to use black powder because of the mess, but it might be worth a try.
I hadn't thought of using some black epoxy to non-permanently raise the height of the front sight. That's a great idea.
|
01-15-2012, 11:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 11,076
Liked 10,925 Times in 3,295 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by krehmkej
Or try lighter bullets..
Heavier/slower = higher
Lighter/faster = lower
|
I can't find a 44 caliber mold less than 200 grains.
|
01-15-2012, 11:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 11,076
Liked 10,925 Times in 3,295 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VAdoublegunner
...I don't know if another powder that will give you equivalent pressures and will be safe, but if I may recommend a couple that could possibly do it better than Bullseye, I would suggest Trail Boss or possibly 5744. I have heard of the latter being used in reduced loads for revolver cartridges, specifically the 44 Russian, to duplicate BP loads. You may want to talk to their ballistician directly if you can't find reliable load data for it. They are pretty helpful.
IMHO, either of those powders seem a safer option in your old revolver than Bullseye. One double charge and it's done. Both TB and 5744 are fairly forgiving as long as you don't compress them.
Edit: For safety purposes, I have linked a discussion that may be of some interest to you here Paco Kelly's Leverguns.com • View topic - Pressure Spike in Smokeless Powders . I am also reminded that 4759 powder is not a bad substitute for BP loads either. I am a big fan of Sherman Bell's discussions of its use in sound quality but old Damascus barrel shotguns that he produced a series of articles for in Double Gun Journal. I found the discussion of TB to be most interesting, btw.
|
Thanks VAdoublegunner for the links and info, and thank you to everyone else for your input.
|
01-15-2012, 11:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DAB, FL
Posts: 78
Likes: 4
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
I have found that JB Weld (a metal epoxy) has worked the best for building up the front sight. It is dark gray when cured. I will use masking tape to form a mold around the existing sight. Then remove the tape and gradually file the sight at the range.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|