Being that the Model 24-6 is just a 44 Mag with the chambers supposedly reamed shorter to only accept 44 Spls, I decided to load into +P pressures.
Increasing the powder charge of HS-6 from 8.0 gr (13,000 CUP) to 9.25 grains got rid of 99% of the soot. The starting 44 Mag load using HS-6 is 12.0 grains (22,000 CUP), all according to the reloading data on Hodgdon's site.
I also increased the OAL from 1.450" to 1.540", which was probably unnecessary.
Now before some of you hair-triggered safety-czars get your knickers in a twist, I called S&W when I found I could chamber 44 Mags in my N-frame 44 Spl. I started to tell the tech guy that 44 Mags just dropped in like it was chambered for it. Before I could go any further he cut me off and said, "The legal department will not allow me to say that it is ok to fire 44 Mags in your revolver because the barrel is stamped "44 S&W Spl Ctg."
But he did freely answer questions about the construction of the Model 24-6.
Is the frame the same size and strength as the N-frame 44 Mag? Yes.
Is the cylinder the same? Yes.
Is the tapered barrel the same? Yes.
Have you encountered this before? Yes.
Has there been a recall or do you think there will be one? No
That last answer is most telling in this lawyer-driven-recall-minded industry.
I told him I bought a 44 Spl because I had no need for a 44 Mag. He said, "I shoot 38 Specials in my 357 Magnum all the time."
So, I have a blue, square butt, 2⅞" S&W 44 Mag Mountain Gun with "44 S&W Spl Ctg" stamped on the barrel.
This revolver is my CCW.
Added later: I loaded 8.5 gr, 9.0 gr, 9.5 gr, and 10.0 grains. The soot just about disappeared at 9.5 grains. So I backed it down to 9.25 grains and still got clean brass. I'm happy. (I wear white shirts a lot.)