Elmer Keith’s .38 special load data

9245

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Messages
123
Reaction score
71
Location
Michigan
Does anyone have Elmer Keith’s .38 special load data?

For background, and since it’s been awhile, I have a 4 inch 10-6, I love it, It’s not my primary carry (although it’s filling that role at the moment due to a variety of circumstances), but I love it for pocket carry (yes I have deep cargo pockets, for context, a full size 1911A1 also fits), it just sits right without moving around and doesn’t feel like I have a brick in my pocket like some of my other options, and I’m just fond of it. However I lack confidence in .38 special, especially given that I have only 6 shots, I would feel much more confident with .357 magnum and previous researched the possibility of doing a conversion as their WAS a .357 version of the 10-6 and the model 13 used the same frame but I ruled that out due to a lack of drop in conversion cylinders and an inability to find a gunsmith willing to modify a .38 special cylinder. My next thought was to develop a hand load but due to only finding SAAMI load data I eventually gave up on that as my ability to properly test is limited testing ability (all I have is a chronograph) and continued difficulty scrounging reloading components in this never ending shortage. It took me 6 months just to find a single box of primers, (I flatly refuse to pay a scalper a single penny) prior to that I was having to cannibalize other .38 special rounds for components.

So now I have a new idea, history. I know the .357 magnum came from Elmer Keith hot loading .38 special and that most of his loads were indeed what we would call .357 magnum loads today, only in a .38 special case, what I don’t know is his load data and I’m not sure where to find it.

I do know the 10-6 can handle the pressure though, given that Smith and Wesson did it themselves, and I also have heard from any sources that the .38 special and .357 magnum cylinders used a common blank and were simply cut differently, and that gunsmiths decades ago did conversions fairly regularly with good results so I do not doubt that the cylinder can handle .357 magnum pressure levels but I do NOT know how to avoid exceeding them, that’s where old Elmer Keith comes in. Does anyone have his load data or can point me to where I can find it?

My gun, my hands, if nothing else it will be an interesting history project, recreating Elmer’s old loads that spawned the .357 Magnum.
 
Register to hide this ad
If you have ever EVER read Keith's writings you would know that he did not give a damn about pressure. He'd load up a cartridge until the gun blew up then get another gun and shoot some more.

Prove it!

I have been reading Elmer's writings since the late '60s and have only found 2 blow-ups.
 
Elmer Keith’s heavy .38 Special load — his #358429 Keith bullet of around 170 grs. over 13.5 grains of #2400

Yep. I have that mold, and have used that same load in a 357 Ruger Blackhawk, just to see if Elmer was sane. Never have chronographed it, probably should have, but it's definitely in the 357 realm based on recoil.
 
Elmer Keith’s heavy .38 Special load — his #358429 Keith bullet of around 170 grs. over 13.5 grains of #2400

I've been loading 2400 for about 10 years in 357 cases. I'll guarantee you, you do not want to use that load in a K frame. But if you do we want to see pictures of the wreckage. :D
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
If you have ever EVER read Keith's writings you would know that he did not give a damn about pressure. He'd load up a cartridge until the gun blew up then get another gun and shoot some more.

Elmer Keith invented destructive testing. In engineering that's a test to find the point of failure.
 
My little M49 snub nose with a 158 lead and 10 grs of 2400 said.... "enough already" at 986fps !!

Now in my 686 6" revolver 15 grs is a magnum load.

I never pushed the envelope with a 158 lead in my K19...........

I would make sure that I had good insurance before going crazy, though.
 
OP, there are plenty of lines of .38+P defensive ammo that have proven effective in police service over decades. Like components, there are shortages, but it's not impossible to find a box or two here and there. Then the challenge would be to work up a reload that shoots similarly for range practice. Why risk a classic revolver and maybe even your eyesight just to find the red line?
 
OP, there are plenty of lines of .38+P defensive ammo that have proven effective in police service over decades. Like components, there are shortages, but it's not impossible to find a box or two here and there. Then the challenge would be to work up a reload that shoots similarly for range practice. Why risk a classic revolver and maybe even your eyesight just to find the red line?

There are a few issues as I see them:

I want more than a few boxes, I’d like to function test with several hundred rounds ideally, or at least a few cylinders worth, but even getting that much ammo anymore is an issue.

I refuse to pay scalpers, flat out, if an ******* scalper owned the last box of ammunition in the world I would sooner improvise my own using range scrap, repurposed chemicals for primers, home made black powder, and melted fishing weights before I paid the *** a penny over retail. Scalpers are why the rest of us can’t find ammo and components.

It may not be the most practical concern, but I’m concerned about body armor, it’s more readily available and cheaper than it’s ever been before and it’s showing up worn by criminals in an increasing rate, see the rioting last year for plenty of visual examples, and while I DO have some decent JHP rounds currently (Federal 130 grain HST Micro) I’m skeptical how well it would perform against barriers (being a full wadcutter) let alone armor of any kind. Also, being a wadcutter it causes issues with speed loaders.

No modern bullet designs, I have recently changed all my other carry ammo to FTM bullets from JHP due to better performance in gel tests as well as better barrier (and armor) penetrating abilities but I have yet to find any in .38 special that is actually in stock, Underwood makes some but it has been out of stock for over a year now and does not appear likely to restock anytime soon. I attempted to make my own, but see my comment about components and testing. I hope to adapt one of Elmer’s loads to use an FTM bullet.

I have a similar issue with 9mm, but at least those components are occasionally available and there is lots of modern +p load data, but the .38 special load data seams to assume anyone shooting .38 special has something from 1898 or a modern cheap import from the Philippines or Turkey, or wherever those $400~ 5 shot .38 special snub noses are coming from and are all very conservative as a result.

It’s a risk, but I wouldn’t consider it if I didn’t think the 10-6 could take it.

Sure, I’d love a model 13, have one with a 4 inch barrel to trade 1 for 1? If not the 10-6 is all I have. But yes, one is on my wish list, I just LIKE these old K frames. Were I to get a modern revolver it would either be an 8 shot .357 magnum or a 6 shot .454 Casul or .460 S&W (if a 6 shot in the latter exists), both for different purposes though.
 
Prove it!

I have been reading Elmer's writings since the late '60s and have only found 2 blow-ups.

Neither was with smokeless powder. One was with Black Powder and one was with King's semi smokeless. They were both in the 1920s. The BP blew a balloon case head and blew the loading gate off, nearly severing EMKs trigger finger. The other was a chain fire from loose primer pockets fired the top three chambers all at once and blew the top 3 chambers and the top strap off another Black Powder SAA...

He read that blew up a bunch o guns stuff on the interweb............

To the OP. I use 11grs 2400 under 160gr swc and 10.5grs 2400 under a 170gr in special cases in my K-frames. 5 to 5.3gr of Unique will work too. You should try something like that before you use 13gr of 2400. That is excessive in a K-frame................
 
Last edited:
You can load a heavy for caliber SWC at a moderate velocity and really improve performance. Most of us would not get a real benefit out of a real hot load - as long as placement is good and penetration adequate, you should be good to go.
 
Back
Top