|
|
08-20-2011, 06:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indian Territory
Posts: 3,321
Likes: 1,770
Liked 559 Times in 260 Posts
|
|
10-6 .357 Magnum question. NYSP?
I picked up a 10-6 .357 Magnum today. I was wondering if NYSP put any markings on theirs, as it doesn't say NYSP anywhere. The only marking other than what came from the factory is a "47" stamped under the assembly number on the crane. So would this be one of the over-run, or could it have been a NYSP issue? It does have holster wear but looks like it has been fired very little, as most issued guns likely would be. Somebody school me on these guns, please.
Thanks!!
__________________
Insert short witty words here
|
08-20-2011, 07:58 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,331
Likes: 34,145
Liked 11,004 Times in 3,966 Posts
|
|
Per the SCS&W:
Quote:
... frame marked 10-6, ".357 Magnum" on the barrel. No known police markings.
|
I had a chance to buy one and passed it up. Some day, maybe ...
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
08-21-2011, 12:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern NY
Posts: 128
Likes: 7
Liked 72 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
As far as I know the NYSP marked all their revolvers. I know the 28s and 681s and 65s were marked on the left side of the frame under the cylinder. The Detective Specials were marked on the back of the grip.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-21-2011, 12:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monument, Colorado
Posts: 437
Likes: 284
Liked 479 Times in 116 Posts
|
|
I seem to recall that NYSP 10-6 revolvers were not marked by/for the agency. I also have a NYSP 10-6 357, mine has no NYSP markings.
|
08-21-2011, 12:16 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,641
Likes: 642
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,550 Posts
|
|
Why'd they phase out the .357 Model 10? I guess they were pushing the 19? Seems like a cool gun to own. Are they more fragile than a 19?
|
08-21-2011, 12:21 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 348
Likes: 37
Liked 93 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbm6893
Why'd they phase out the .357 Model 10? I guess they were pushing the 19? Seems like a cool gun to own. Are they more fragile than a 19?
|
I thought they replaced them with the model 13.
Last edited by jlanecole; 08-21-2011 at 12:23 PM.
|
08-21-2011, 12:31 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,641
Likes: 642
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,550 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlanecole
I thought they replaced them with the model 13.
|
Maybe. The trooper guns were 4", though. 13's are 3 inch.
|
08-21-2011, 02:26 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 1,110
Liked 2,897 Times in 391 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlanecole
I thought they replaced them with the model 13.
|
Yes, the 10-6 357 evolved into the Model 13 357. I'll try and post a copy of a factory letter on a 13 that explains in great detail the evolution of the Model 13. In 1972 the last 1200 Model 10-6 in 357 Mag were built for LEAs and were actually the first Model 13s though they were stamped 10-6.
Chuck
__________________
SWCA1517 SWHF256
Rangers LTW!
|
08-21-2011, 03:30 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,641
Likes: 642
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,550 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 29-1
Yes, the 10-6 357 evolved into the Model 13 357. I'll try and post a copy of a factory letter on a 13 that explains in great detail the evolution of the Model 13. In 1972 the last 1200 Model 10-6 in 357 Mag were built for LEAs and were actually the first Model 13s though they were stamped 10-6.
Chuck
|
So uniformed cops were carrying 3" Model 13's? Interesting. Or did the early Model 13's come with 4 inch barrels?
|
08-21-2011, 04:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 542
Likes: 928
Liked 329 Times in 151 Posts
|
|
The 10-6, chambered in .357magnum, followed the 4" Colt Official Police. As far as I know, the agency did not mark the 10-6, nor the 13-1 before they moved on to the 28-2 which was their first revolver marked NYSP vs. the earlier NYST stampings.
|
08-21-2011, 04:43 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,586
Likes: 90,551
Liked 25,031 Times in 8,571 Posts
|
|
"13's are 3 inch."
Not all of them. I've owned several 4" square butt M13s and have known other police officers that also owned 4" M13s.
"Are they more fragile than a 19?"
No more than a M10. The M13s had the heavy barrel like some of the M10s. The exposed ejector rod is a bit more prone to bending as opposed the enclosed rod found on the M19s.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Last edited by Muley Gil; 08-21-2011 at 04:47 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-10-2012, 08:57 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 1 Post
|
|
I started with the NYSP in September 1977 and was issued a 10-6 357 with a 4" barrel and I do not recall it being marked. The next gun issued was the Model 28 marked NYSP just prior to the Olympics in Lake Placid. Around 1983 we got 681 4" marked NYSP on the left frame above the trigger. Because I was on the SWAT team (Mobile Response Team) I was issued one of the first Glocks in 9mm(I think the serial Number was US00051) After Tpr AJ Speer got shot and killed in Horseheads NY we went to the Glock in 45 GAP. Other parts of the NYSP carried a variety of issue guns. The NARC's when I started were issued Walthers in 380 (PPK I think, even though they were banned by the 1968 GCA) The BCI (detectives when I started carried 2" Colt DS in 38 spl and went to a 3" stainless (I think 13) when the uniform went to the model 28. On the MRT the first automatic we were issued was the Beretta 92 in 9mm. I was involved in the R&D and because the military had adopted it we had a lot of data to show the need and didn't need to prove much to the people that make the decisions. When the the state started researching the general issue automatic in the mid-80's Glock and Sig Sauer when the tests based in the multiple factors for a general issue handgun for a large department. The Glock had one malfunction per 1000 rounds and the Sig P226 had none. These were torture tests and not your everyday going to the range type shooting. When it came down to it both guns were exceptional. When it came down to buying the guns, Glock basically said give us your Smith and Wesson 681's and buy the holsters from us and we will give you the Glocks. Sig wanted 1+ million for the 5k + guns. I believe the NYSP were the first large department to adopt the Glock ( I got mine in the summer of 1988) so whoever was in Glocks marketing should be complemented. This is the "in the trenches" version and I am sure someone has another one but this is the one most of the field people know.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-10-2012, 09:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 826
Likes: 517
Liked 303 Times in 132 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 29-1
Yes, the 10-6 357 evolved into the Model 13 357. I'll try and post a copy of a factory letter on a 13 that explains in great detail the evolution of the Model 13. In 1972 the last 1200 Model 10-6 in 357 Mag were built for LEAs and were actually the first Model 13s though they were stamped 10-6.
Chuck
|
I would love to see your letter. If you could post it that would be great! My 10-6 has no markings either. It has like the flat blue. What I love the most about this model is the smooth combat trigger which is oversized and the oversized hammer.
To all 10-6 357 mag owners : When you pull the trigger double action is it a long pull or short? Mine is short. It is my most accurate revolver! Enjoy!
__________________
2 Timothy 1:7
Last edited by Rapidray; 04-10-2012 at 09:47 AM.
Reason: Added photo
|
04-10-2012, 09:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 3,529
Likes: 1,904
Liked 5,632 Times in 1,544 Posts
|
|
I had the 10-6, and posted it here. I liked it, but let it go at a huge profit, and bought more S&Ws. It was in the serial range of the NYSP guns, and had the matching features. Very smooth shooter. Had I not been offered to triple my money, I would still have it. It was not marked conspicuously.
Side note: I have seen model 10-6 revolvers that were over-stamped 13.
|
04-10-2012, 10:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 3,529
Likes: 1,904
Liked 5,632 Times in 1,544 Posts
|
|
10-6 .357 Magnum SCORE!!!
This is the thread about mine. Enjoy!
|
04-10-2012, 10:07 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: texas
Posts: 248
Likes: 142
Liked 102 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
rkw1786 I started in Law Enforcement in Texas in 1984 and I enjoyed your very detailed story. You are right I remember the Glocks spreading like wildfire because of the marketing. I own a 13-3 3 inch. I carried one like it as an off duty for many years before I had to have something else. Got one back last year. Great gun.
|
04-10-2012, 10:27 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 1,110
Liked 2,897 Times in 391 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapidray
I would love to see your letter. If you could post it that would be great! My 10-6 has no markings either. It has like the flat blue. What I love the most about this model is the smooth combat trigger which is oversized and the oversized hammer.
To all 10-6 357 mag owners : When you pull the trigger double action is it a long pull or short? Mine is short. It is my most accurate revolver! Enjoy!
|
Ray, here you go. Sorry it took so long to post this info. Thanks for reminding me to do it. Getting old I guess.
Chuck
__________________
SWCA1517 SWHF256
Rangers LTW!
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-10-2012, 01:43 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 826
Likes: 517
Liked 303 Times in 132 Posts
|
|
29-1
Love the letter...so you have an F.B.I. 13-2. That is cool. I am thinking maybe I should get my 10-6 lettered as it does have the flat blue finish or what's left of it. And they say those are the ones the NYSP got. Again thanks for sharing!
__________________
2 Timothy 1:7
|
04-10-2012, 02:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 223
Likes: 16
Liked 41 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
WOW WOW WOW!
What a great Thread! Fantastic reading Guys. That letter is helpful.
It is nice to see S&W help so much with these older revolvers.
I recently called Ruger about a SS Mini 14 "G" model (181 series) from 1980. They refused to tell me anything about the history. I am told it belonged to a small PD here in NH, but a letter from Ruger would of been really neat to display with my Mini 14.
|
04-11-2012, 01:50 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 158
Likes: 1
Liked 37 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkw1786
I started with the NYSP in September 1977 and was issued a 10-6 357 with a 4" barrel and I do not recall it being marked. The next gun issued was the Model 28 marked NYSP just prior to the Olympics in Lake Placid. Around 1983 we got 681 4" marked NYSP on the left frame above the trigger. Because I was on the SWAT team (Mobile Response Team) I was issued one of the first Glocks in 9mm(I think the serial Number was US00051) After Tpr AJ Speer got shot and killed in Horseheads NY we went to the Glock in 45 GAP. Other parts of the NYSP carried a variety of issue guns. The NARC's when I started were issued Walthers in 380 (PPK I think, even though they were banned by the 1968 GCA) The BCI (detectives when I started carried 2" Colt DS in 38 spl and went to a 3" stainless (I think 13) when the uniform went to the model 28. On the MRT the first automatic we were issued was the Beretta 92 in 9mm. I was involved in the R&D and because the military had adopted it we had a lot of data to show the need and didn't need to prove much to the people that make the decisions. When the the state started researching the general issue automatic in the mid-80's Glock and Sig Sauer when the tests based in the multiple factors for a general issue handgun for a large department. The Glock had one malfunction per 1000 rounds and the Sig P226 had none. These were torture tests and not your everyday going to the range type shooting. When it came down to it both guns were exceptional. When it came down to buying the guns, Glock basically said give us your Smith and Wesson 681's and buy the holsters from us and we will give you the Glocks. Sig wanted 1+ million for the 5k + guns. I believe the NYSP were the first large department to adopt the Glock ( I got mine in the summer of 1988) so whoever was in Glocks marketing should be complemented. This is the "in the trenches" version and I am sure someone has another one but this is the one most of the field people know.
|
Glock: Rise of America's gun
|
01-01-2013, 11:23 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ST. MARYS, OHIO
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
kowboy
Not a new one here, just a renew after a long time.
|
01-01-2013, 11:35 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ST. MARYS, OHIO
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 29-1
Yes, the 10-6 357 evolved into the Model 13 357. I'll try and post a copy of a factory letter on a 13 that explains in great detail the evolution of the Model 13. In 1972 the last 1200 Model 10-6 in 357 Mag were built for LEAs and were actually the first Model 13s though they were stamped 10-6.
Chuck
|
Yes I have one 10-6 and there are no LEA`S OR LEO`S markings.
S/N D6862**
|
|
Tags
|
357 magnum, 380, 681, beretta, colt, detective, ejector, military, model 10, model 28, p226, ppk, ruger, sauer, smith & wesson, smith and wesson, smith-wessonforum.com, trooper |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|