|
|
10-27-2011, 10:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dixie County Florida
Posts: 52
Likes: 22
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Weight diff between 65 3" and 686 3"?
I'm sure I could find it if I looked but does anyone know the diff in weight of these 2 3" revolvers???
Just thinking that a 686 w/7 shot cyl would not weigh very much more than my 65-3 w/3" brl and would be stronger and have adjustable sights.
If my train of thought runs true I may have a police trade in 65-3 for sale soon..... 308
|
10-27-2011, 10:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ellisville, Missouri
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 4,996
Liked 1,309 Times in 685 Posts
|
|
I don't have the exact numbers but a 4" 686Plus is less than an ounce heavier than a 4" Model 10.
That may be good news for you but somehow I suspect you will someday regret trading away a 3" 65.
|
10-28-2011, 12:15 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 94
Likes: 1
Liked 48 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
65 vs 686
My 3" model 65-3 weighs 1 lb 15.75 oz wearing magnas and a Tyler T.
My 2.5" model 686-3 weighs 2 lbs 2.25 oz wearing magnas ( no t-grip)
So, about 2.5 oz more on the 686, maybe 3 counting the T-Grip. The 7 shot cylinder 686 would be slightly lighter, but the 3" bbl 686 would be heavier. Probably a wash. Incidentally, six rounds of Buffalo Bore 158 .357 weighs 3.75 oz, the seventh round weighs another .5 - .75 oz or so.
The K frame is still easier to carry due to smaller cylinder diameter.
|
10-28-2011, 08:12 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 3,532
Likes: 1,906
Liked 5,638 Times in 1,547 Posts
|
|
It's not the weight. Really.
It's the FEEL.
You will regret dumping your 65. I do.
|
10-28-2011, 10:50 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Music City USA
Posts: 28
Likes: 2
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
I agree completely. My 3" 65 has a perfect feel and balance that I've never found in any other handgun.
|
10-28-2011, 12:15 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Due south of Orlando
Posts: 6,921
Likes: 597
Liked 3,451 Times in 1,412 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tennessee Jed
I agree completely. My 3" 65 has a perfect feel and balance that I've never found in any other handgun.
|
On the hunt at a local gunshow this weekend for one.
__________________
Dick
|
10-29-2011, 07:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ask the NSA
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 111
Liked 119 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Isn't any way I'd give up that 65 for a 686 if you're using it for SD. Especially for an IL model. It's your revolver and can do what ya want with it, but them 65's are great carry weapons and feel much better in the hand IMO. Have a 3" 66 and a 3" 686 and would sell the 686 first.
__________________
V/R
Roger / SG
|
10-30-2011, 08:02 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northeast Florida
Posts: 211
Likes: 304
Liked 35 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Another vote for the 65 3" as the one to have -- and with magnas plus Tyler-T. Mine, too, must weight 1 pound 15.75 ounces - thanks for the info dubhelix.
|
01-25-2012, 02:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cranston, RI, US
Posts: 153
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
OK, try this one. I have a M 65 3"; I'm looking at a 3" Ruger GP100. Any idea as to how much heavier the Ruger would be? Carrying and rotator cuff are the consideration.
HiCap (LoCap) when I carry a revolver.
__________________
HiCap
|
01-25-2012, 04:25 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 4,162
Likes: 341
Liked 3,944 Times in 1,494 Posts
|
|
Sorry, I don't know what the weight of the GP is, but in my opinion, the superior trigger action of the Model 65 wins the day for me.
Best of luck,
Dave
|
01-25-2012, 04:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 3,532
Likes: 1,906
Liked 5,638 Times in 1,547 Posts
|
|
Ok, I can answer this one, as I have had multiple of both.
IF (and this is a BIG "IF") you get the 3" GP100 with the partial underlug, it will be almost a total wash.
I had the full underlug blued 3" GP100, and a 3" model 65LS at the same time, and they were able to be carried in the same leather, and shooting them was actually quite similar, although the GP uses L-frame speedloaders.
I decided that I did not like the apearance of the stainless 65 OR the appearance of the (badly) blued GP, and sold them both. If it were a half underlug stainless ruger, I may have kept it.
I advise you to seek out a 2.75" Speed Six, as it will have nearly identical handling caracteristics of the 3" model 65, and be both cheaper and (some would say) stronger.
|
01-25-2012, 04:40 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,820
Likes: 59,159
Liked 53,717 Times in 16,733 Posts
|
|
M65, the perfect gun for general work, imo
__________________
Sure you did
|
01-25-2012, 06:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 1,286
Liked 1,204 Times in 380 Posts
|
|
Personally, that's not a trade I would make.
Practice with the 3 inch and 158gr +P's will overcome any disadvantage you may think you have.
The 3 incher points almost naturally in a defensive situation.
If 6 won't do the job...you shouldn't be there in the first place.
Speed strips work great if you practice with them. And you can always load 2 real quick and get back on target fast, then load the other 4 after the dust settles.
My wife and I practice that drill until it's second nature.
If belt carry is too much, a good shoulder rig works great.
Just my .02 worth.
__________________
Take your time..quickly.
|
01-26-2012, 01:06 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OR
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 5,539
Liked 1,037 Times in 351 Posts
|
|
Had my 3" 65 with me this week at the range and have to agree that it has become my favorite go-to gun for the reasons described above. It points, weighs and feels like an extension of my fingers - so that "aiming" isn't really necessary anymore short to medium distances. Mine usually wears RB combat grips but I'm experimenting with a set of Uncle Mike's grips that I picked up cheap recently.
Jerry
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|