My 686, please educate me

Looking good guys.

Is there a reason my 686 has the S&W on the right side instead of the left, like those 2 pics recently posted?

I'm not sure why S&W moved the logo, but it may have to do with using grips that obscure part or all of it. Look at the pic with your Hogues, half the logo is covered. It seems S&W has moved the logo and changed its size on several models over the years. There are many members here on the forum that study, know and understand all these little moves that the company made. Maybe someone will be along to give a better answer.
 
Looking good guys.

Is there a reason my 686 has the S&W on the right side instead of the left, like those 2 pics recently posted?

The logo went to the left side and got smaller around 1980/81 or so...some say to allow for commemorative markings but I'm not sure. As with most S&W's changes there was some overlap time and you can find examples of models and dash changes around that time with most any combination of characteristics. BUT, that is the first time I have EVER seen a 686 with the large logo on the right side like the older P&R magnums...VERY early 686 IMHO...maybe others have seen this before but a first for me.

Another example of why you have to be careful if you say "Smith never made one like that" in regards to their guns...you'll eat crow at least half the time!
 
Last edited:
Quick question.

Am I supposed to call this a 686 No Dash? Or would it have some other name?
 
Quick question.

Am I supposed to call this a 686 No Dash? Or would it have some other name?

Roger: while I'm no expert, my understanding of the unofficial rules of S&W nomenclature indicate that you can call your Model 686 either a "Model 686 no dash", or a "Model 686-0". I owned one of the early ones with a 6.0 inch barrel and traded it later for a Model 625. I missed it so much that I eventually found and bought another Model 686 with the adjustable front and rear sights set up for silohuette shooting.

Great trade you made with your buddy.

Regards,

Dave

________________________

Update: Roger, I've added a photo of my Model 686-3 - a super accurate revolver with a nice 2X Leupold scope.

Regards,

Dave
 

Attachments

  • 686-3 #1.jpg
    686-3 #1.jpg
    82.9 KB · Views: 16
Last edited:
I'm coming to this party late, but let me add my congratulations on your wise decision to take the trade and make a few observations. First and foremost, if S&W ever built a gun that could be fired a lot (in this case there is no such word as "excessively") you own it! It's built like a tank and the SS finish might be scratched, but can almost always be cleaned up to appear nearly new. You may wear out the "innards" but you would really have to work at it. As for the grips, I would humbly suggest you try on a pair of the factory "Smooth Combat" grips with finger grooves that were current production about the same time as that gun. If you don't want to pay the freight on originals, somebody is making a good copy of them now (Ahrends? Altamont?) that I think would also do nicely. To me, they are just about perfect for the K- and L-frame guns (see attached picture of my custom K-327.)

Regards,
Froggie
 

Attachments

  • Charlie's Custom .327.jpg
    Charlie's Custom .327.jpg
    112.8 KB · Views: 42
I called S&W today with this 686's serial number. It was shipped in 1980. He was unable to give me a month.

It now wears factory target stocks, and it's still a sweet shooter. :)


 
Back
Top