Model 63

stykshooter

Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
230
Reaction score
434
Location
Roanoke, Va.
I am addicted to .22 handguns and own numerous offerings from Smith & Wesson, Ruger and Browning, plus conversion kits for my Kimbers and Glocks. I shoot a lot of .22.

I have a couple K-22's, Full lug model 17, 617's, etc. Always liked my S & W .22 revolvers. With the exception of the J frames. I have owned two different model 34's and a 1980's vintage model 63. Although I liked the concept, I couldn't find anything that would shoot even mediocre out of any of them. The 63 I had wouldn't group 8-10 inches at 25 yards with any ammo and considerably worse with some brands. As a result, I have kind sworn off of the J frame .22's over the years.

I recently had the opportunity to handle one of the new production model 63's and as a result, ordered one in for myself. I was impressed with the gun right from the start. Put together well and a great single action trigger. An added bonus for my 60 year old eyes is the Hi Viz front sight. Still, I was apprehensive about how well it would shoot. My K frame .22's have kinda spoiled me from an accuracy point of view.

I took it to the range yesterday and my son and I shot about 500 rounds through it, using 12 different varieties of .22's. A couple loads were obviously disliked by the revolver and produced groups in the 10" range but I was pleasantly surprised by how well it shot the majority of the loads. It didn't do particularly well with high velocity loads but anything subsonic or standard velocity shot very well.

It shot C.C.I. subsonic H.P.'s into a 2" group as well as C.C.I. Standard Velocity and Federal Automatch. Surprisingly, and very happily from my point of view, it shot two of the cheapest ammos into the best groups. It shot two cylinders full of Federal American Eagle into about a 2" group at 25 yards with the exception of one flyer and shot two sub 2" groups at 25 yards with C.C.I. Blazer ammo. Blazer and S.V. are basically the same ammo and I am going to utilize it as my go to ammo for this revolver until I discover something it shoots better. Gotta love a gun that shoots well with cheap ammo!

After several less than favorable experiences with J frame .22's, I am very pleasantly surprised with this latest offering. No problems, no malfunctions and what I consider exceptional accuracy from a 3" barrel.

One additional note... after shooting as much ammo through it as I did without any cleaning other than a pre-range going over, I experienced none of the sticky cylinder extraction problems that typically plague some S & W .22 revolvers.
 

Attachments

  • 63.JPG
    63.JPG
    141.2 KB · Views: 202
Register to hide this ad
I have an older model 63, and it is the last revolver I would sell. It is accurate, versatile, and overall the best one I own.
 
I have an older no-lock 63 too and love this little gun for the range. It has a 4” barrel & adjustable rear sight w/a red insert front. Hard to miss w/that, even for me.
 
Several guys told me that about their older 63's and 43's... I have no doubt that I just got ahold to individual specimens that were the exception. I'm lucky like that...
 
Like all J-frame guns, the 63s are difficult for most people to shoot well, but are capable of surprising accuracy. Worth trying a bunch of different ammos in search of the best.
 
I had a 4" back in the late 80's. Sold it.

Missed out on the 5" version from a few years ago. Waited too long. Now they go for crazy$$$.
 
When it comes to Smith .22 revolvers, I never warmed up to the J frames; for me there’s no need for a .22 to be that small. I think the K frame is a near perfect platform, especially those with 10 chambers; unfortunately mine only have 6, but I would get rid of the for anything.
 
Hello neighbor!

Thank you stykshooter for the inspiration to go to Sportsmanship Wearhouse Monday and pick up a variety of 22lr for my 4" model 63. Then I can go to the range and find out what my J frame likes best. After that, we can meet and see if your new 63 can outshoot my old 1981 no dash!

Oh! And bring your model 16-4 so we can have another shootout with them too.
 
1980's vintage model 63. Although I liked the concept, I couldn't find anything that would shoot even mediocre out of any of them. The 63 I had wouldn't group 8-10 inches at 25 yards with any ammo and considerably worse with some brands.

As a result, I have kind sworn off of the J frame .22's over the years.

After several less than favorable experiences with J frame .22's, I am very pleasantly surprised with this latest offering. No problems, no malfunctions and what I consider exceptional accuracy from a 3" barrel.

Same boat as you, had a 4" model 63 & really wanted to like it, even dressed it up in some fancy S&W combat grips. Thing would just not shoot at all, tried every type of ammo I could find, as this was back in the mid 80's didn't have all the sub sonic choices we do today. Glad you found yourself a shooter, I've made my peace with J frame family & am a happy Model 18-3 shooter now.

Mine closely resembled this one.


41
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180224_20925.jpg
    IMG_20180224_20925.jpg
    39.6 KB · Views: 89
Last edited:
I had an older M63, M34, and K22 and all were accurate especially the K22, I just never warmed up to them and I love Smith center fire revovers. My favorite .22 handgun is a Bersa Thunder, they are a lot of fun and I like that it resembles a Walther PPK.
 
"I've made my peace with J frame family & am a happy Model 18-3 shooter now."

I too have an 18-3 that would being in the running for being my favorite .22 revolver, except that my wife has claimed that particular pistol as "HER" gun. 40 plus years of use has given that revolver a butter smooth action.
 
J-Frame .22's

I bought my Model 63-3 new in the eighties. It's my go-to around the house varmint dispatcher, and has accounted for so many raccoons and possums that I've literally lost count.
Model 63-3
IMG_0473.jpg

IMG_0480.jpg


Last November, I found a screaming deal on a used Model 317-3 AirLite at one of my local gun stores. It may end up giving my Model 63-3 a run for its money. The 317-3 is super accurate, just like the 63, holds two more rounds (8 Total), has a super slick action, and is incredibly lightweight!
Model 317-3
IMG_0463.jpg

IMG_0466.jpg

IMG_0468.jpg
 
I bought my model 63 in 1980, and I took many cottontails with it. Glad I didn't know it wasn't accurate back then. I put Herrett stocks on it, and it's still bringing home small game. I can't see the front sight as clear these days when it's not a bright sunny day outside. I keep thinking of working on the factory sights, but it's hard to do, as it was the first new S&W revolver I purchased.
 
In November I bought a new Model 63 3" 8rds. I don't do much target shooting and so far have just sighted this one in and done some plinking with it. I do like it very much. I sometimes carry it in a front pocket in a pocket holster when out for a walk along the swamp edge or fishing. I like the sights and trigger.
Steve W
 
Here is my youngest grandson today shooting a 1981 vintage Model 63 in the Texas Hill Country. His first time shooting a handgun - after a year of BB gun & .22 single shot rifle instruction.
I gave that neat little pistol to his older brother (now 15) last year as a b'day gift:

86_DCDC58_C0_D4_437_F_881_F_07819_F0_C2426.jpg
 
I'd wanted a nice 22 revolver (3" barrel) since I got back into shooting a few years ago. A used 63-5 showed up at my LGS early Jan. in excellent condition. Could not pass it up. Paid $549 and tax. I love it. fun gun to shoot and goes great with my Model 66-2 w/ 4" barrel.
 

Attachments

  • 63.jpg
    63.jpg
    96.9 KB · Views: 67
My 63 with new grips

I had to send my 63 back when it was new to get the barrel replaced. I put Altamont grips on it, they feel great and fill my hand much better.
 

Attachments

  • 63_3.jpg
    63_3.jpg
    194.5 KB · Views: 74
  • 63_4.jpg
    63_4.jpg
    198.7 KB · Views: 44
  • 63_1.jpg
    63_1.jpg
    217.7 KB · Views: 39
  • 63_2.jpg
    63_2.jpg
    196.9 KB · Views: 34
Back
Top