Bodyguard .38 - any experiences?

bcj128

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
71
Reaction score
74
Location
So Cal
Looking to pick one of these up as a pocket / backup gun. I already have a 642 but the price on the Bodyguard makes it tempting.

Anyone have any thoughts or experiences?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The gun is extremely light for concealed carry, but the recoil is not that bad IMO. It locked up on me about a year ago when I was at the range, sent it back to the mother ship and it came back good as new, and they even replaced the Insight laser with a Crimson Trace. Definitely not a gun to shoot a couple boxes through at the range.
 
The original S&W Bodyguard revolvers, the Model 38 and its offspring (Model 49, 438, 638, 649) are my favorite J-frame revolvers. I EDC a Model 38-0 and a Model 638-1. I have no interest in the newer Bodyguard. The Model 642 is my 2nd favorite J-frame and is the favorite handgun of my young daughter and my wife. Both of them like the simplicity of point and pull the trigger.

Regards,

Dave

PS, Update - added photos: My EDC consisting of a Model 38-0 and Model 638-1. The Model 38-0 has a nickeled cylinder from a donor "parts" Model 38 to make my version of the MSP (Michigan State Police) back-up gun. Also pictured are my Model 638-1 and Model 649-0 (the Model 649 is on the bottom in both photos.

Regards,

Dave
 

Attachments

  • S&W Model 38 & Model 638 #1.jpg
    S&W Model 38 & Model 638 #1.jpg
    89.4 KB · Views: 62
  • S&W Model 38 & Model 638 #2.jpg
    S&W Model 38 & Model 638 #2.jpg
    86.4 KB · Views: 45
  • S&W 649 & 638 Left.jpg
    S&W 649 & 638 Left.jpg
    82.1 KB · Views: 51
  • S&W 649 & 638 Right.jpg
    S&W 649 & 638 Right.jpg
    79.8 KB · Views: 36
Last edited:
I am pretty much in Double-O-Dave's camp. I believe the model 649 and similar revolvers are the best pocket guns ever made and that the "Centennial" style guns are close runner up. I recently purchased a 640 Pro and it seems like a nice gun so far.

I was at a range to schedule some training yesterday. The guy who ran the range asked me what sort of gun I would bring to the training. I said the S&W 640 in my pocket. He looked at me like I was some sort of Neanderthal for bringing a revolver to class. I did not point out that I was armed and he didn't know it or that I could establish a firing grip on my revolver without him knowing that either.
 
Got one soon after they came out. Had timing and fitment problems from Day 1. Had it back to the factory twice, no joy. Finally, the gunsmith at the LGS said it couldn't be fixed. Had enough by that time, took a beating, traded it in toward a Model 36. Hopefully, they're better now. Maybe mine was the exception. My advice? Pass on the Bodyguard and keep what you've got.
 
Bodyguard .38

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbaPUemCcXg[/ame]

I've been using the BG38 since the first year that they came out. I've had zero issues with my BG38.

I made this video to show that my carry load (158 +P Lead HP) can be shot quickly and accurately with this gun.
 
J-frame guns are certainly among the very best for carrying. I'm unaware of any safer handguns. However, they are not for novices and are difficult to shoot well. They are quite accurate in the hands of a skilled shooter. The alloy-frame guns are very light and the difficulty for the less-than-skilled shooter increases with these guns over the regular versions.

Before one delves into laser grips, trigger enhancements, headlights, bobbed hammers, speedloaders, and other accessories of questionable worth, it's very important to practice sufficiently with an unmolested, out-of-the-box J-frame gun. Learn to shoot well. If you truly see a need for gadgetry at that point, that's when to accessorize as you'll have a real feel for the gun and your own abilities.

Practice and carry whatever ammo works best - what shoots to point-of-aim, allows for quick recoil recovery, doesn't project a vicious fireball from the barrel, and that you can hit the target consistently with. All other ammo considerations are secondary despite the gospel preached by the sedentary gunfighting theorists.

You only deceive yourself by shooting at close targets. Shooting up close may show that you are an excellent marksman when you are far from it, masks your shortcomings, and shows that all ammo, even the sorriest stuff, is accurate. Good luck-
 
J-frame guns are certainly among the very best for carrying. I'm unaware of any safer handguns. However, they are not for novices and are difficult to shoot well. They are quite accurate in the hands of a skilled shooter. The alloy-frame guns are very light and the difficulty for the less-than-skilled shooter increases with these guns over the regular versions.



Before one delves into laser grips, trigger enhancements, headlights, bobbed hammers, speedloaders, and other accessories of questionable worth, it's very important to practice sufficiently with an unmolested, out-of-the-box J-frame gun. Learn to shoot well. If you truly see a need for gadgetry at that point, that's when to accessorize as you'll have a real feel for the gun and your own abilities.



Practice and carry whatever ammo works best - what shoots to point-of-aim, allows for quick recoil recovery, doesn't project a vicious fireball from the barrel, and that you can hit the target consistently with. All other ammo considerations are secondary despite the gospel preached by the sedentary gunfighting theorists.



You only deceive yourself by shooting at close targets. Shooting up close may show that you are an excellent marksman when you are far from it, masks your shortcomings, and shows that all ammo, even the sorriest stuff, is accurate. Good luck-



I’ve had J frames since I started my career in 1991. They are excellent weapons - so much so that I deeply regret selling my original 640 (no dash, just .38 special goodness). I’d hunt for another if getting one into CA wasn’t such a pain.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Which type of Model 38's are we talking about here?

There are two. The old humpback ones, or the new current production ones.

The older ones look like my Model 49 below. They are lighter, however, as they have an aluminum frame, whereas the 49's frame is steel.

I consider the older humpback 38 very desirable and I'd love to fine a nice one to go with my 49.

Then new ones aren't so great, and I'd consider the 642's a better choice.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 49-0.jpg
    49-0.jpg
    50 KB · Views: 389
Last edited:
Sort of hate to mention this, but after having many J-frame .38 Specials in various configurations, the most accurate of them all has been a straight-out-of-the-box 638 (don't know how many dashes it has) that I got new about ten or twelve years ago. It has the lock, ugly black plastic grips, etc., but it really shoots well. Maybe it's one of a kind.
 
The original S&W Bodyguard revolvers, the Model 38 and its offspring (Model 49, 438, 638, 649) are my favorite J-frame revolvers. I EDC a Model 38-0 and a Model 638-1. I have no interest in the newer Bodyguard. The Model 642 is my 2nd favorite J-frame and is the favorite handgun of my young daughter and my wife. Both of them like the simplicity of point and pull the trigger.

Regards,

Dave

I went just a slightly different path, going with the Model 49 (the all steel version of the M 38), mainly for the recoil reduction of the slight extra weight, because of 'arthur' in my hands.

I also have zero interest in the newer Bodyguards.

Rob
 
The current offering from Smith named the Bodyguard38 isn’t a j frame: it’s an action not used in any other gun.

These things are notorious for locking up and otherwise not working reliably.

Smith hasn’t (and won’t fix) fixed the design flaws that contribute to its unreliability.

I won’t use an inherently unreliable gun for sd: the Tupperware Bodyguard 38 is the paradigm case of an inherently unreliable handgun.

Any real j frame is a better choice.
 
Last edited:
I'm naked without mine. And I absolutely love the SA option. Others don't, but I do. I like knowing I can hit something with it if I need to. That group is DA at 25 yards.
 

Attachments

  • grp2.jpg
    grp2.jpg
    50.6 KB · Views: 54
The current offering from Smith named the Bodyguard38 isn’t a j frame: it’s an action not used in any other gun....

Yes, there seems to some confusion here. I believe the OP was talking about the M&P Bodyguard .38, which can be had for under $300 with the military/first responder rebate. It’s not a J frame and is radically different from the models 38 and 49.

Here’s a photo:

415003338_1.jpg
 
Yes, there seems to some confusion here. I believe the OP was talking about the M&P Bodyguard .38, which can be had for under $300 with the military/first responder rebate. It’s not a J frame and is radically different from the models 38 and 49.

Here’s a photo:

415003338_1.jpg

My mistake in my post about a J-frame 638. I have only around three or four S&W revolvers that aren't at least twenty -five years old and am not up on the current stuff. I was unaware S&W builds such a revolver as the one depicted. That's a real looker and so are the stocks...I don't think I need one.
 
If anyone has a Model 38 or Bodyguard Airweight for sale you'd be better off shelling out the extra loot for a better quality firearm with some character and history :)
 
Bought one a couple of years ago because I thought it unusual. Mine worked fine but I don't carry it because of the negative hype it got back then. Only put about 100 rounds thru it. Quite frankly, I had forgotten about it.
 
I'm naked without mine. And I absolutely love the SA option. Others don't, but I do. I like knowing I can hit something with it if I need to. That group is DA at 25 yards.

My new 640 Pro seems like a nice gun so for but I wish it were a 649 Pro. I do like the single action capability. I sometimes carry my 649 around the farm and the single action comes in handy every once in a while.
 
Back
Top