|
 |

11-30-2019, 05:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2
Likes: 3
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Torn between 627 Pro and 627 PC (both current production)
Hi Gents, new member here but long time lurker of this amazing site, and life time lover of Smiths and big 3rd Gen fan. I've read the archived threads about this topic, and was wondering if anyone might care to share their current opinion on this one.
Reason for purchase is for an overall nice 8 shot .357, and of course, because it's a S&W. I won't be hunting with it, and at this point I don't plan to ever carry it, but the carry part could possibly change. I prefer softer grips, so if I purchased the PC I'd put the supplied Hogues on it.
Specifically, I wonder most about opinions on the inch difference in barrel length, and also if I'm just over thinking that point. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

11-30-2019, 06:15 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 3,452
Liked 24,171 Times in 6,167 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the Forum
One inch in barrel length is not that big of a deal where ballistics are concerned
However, have you handled both of them side by side? Most shooter like the balance of the 5"
Neither revolver really lends it self to concealed carry
A PRO series Smith and Wesson is a gun that was manufactured on the production floor and has one or more Performance Center features
I am partial to the Performance Center offering over the pro series. The Performance Center revolvers are not milled on the same mills as production guns. Even the code run on the machines is different.
For me Performance Center products are worth the money over the Production guns
__________________
"Acta non verba"
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|

11-30-2019, 06:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Salem ,Oregon
Posts: 84
Likes: 1,570
Liked 121 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
I had some of the same thoughts before I chose the PC version. Here's why I chose the PC over the Pro. I like the five inch barrel and most say the additional hand fitting and better tuning of the PC are a big plus. The extra set of stocks doesn't hurt, but I will never use them.
It took me a bit to get over the additional cost, but the 5 inch barrel was my deciding factor. I hope this helps. Thanks! Mick
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|

11-30-2019, 06:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2
Likes: 3
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by colt_saa
Welcome to the Forum
One inch in barrel length is not that big of a deal where ballistics are concerned
However, have you handled both of them side by side? Most shooter like the balance of the 5"
Neither revolver really lends it self to concealed carry
A PRO series Smith and Wesson is a gun that was manufactured on the production floor and has one or more Performance Center features
I am partial to the Performance Center offering over the pro series. The Performance Center revolvers are not milled on the same mills as production guns. Even the code run on the machines is different.
For me Performance Center products are worth the money over the Production guns
|
Thank you.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-01-2019, 04:42 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 7,608
Likes: 30,348
Liked 8,738 Times in 3,896 Posts
|
|
I asked my LGS/range last year whether they could order either the Pro Series 4" or the 5" PC. Only the Pro Series was available. When the Pro arrived a few days later, I opened the box and, ridiculous as it sounds, haven't recovered since. It is the finest revolver I own. This did not stop me from buying the snub 627 PC that was languishing in the display case for months. If the 5" PC should arrive at the LGS, well, these other members don't know what a great revolver is, and I do.  Good luck in your choice.
Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-01-2019, 11:31 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 263
Likes: 3,279
Liked 496 Times in 165 Posts
|
|
I personally like 4 inch barrels, plus should I want to shoot IDPA I could with the Pro Series SSR.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-01-2019, 01:14 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Land of Enchantment
Posts: 844
Likes: 594
Liked 1,937 Times in 574 Posts
|
|
Is/was there a 627 8 shot ever made without the backcut underlug? I want an 8 shot but don't like that look at all.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-01-2019, 01:36 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Western NC
Posts: 3,855
Likes: 3,290
Liked 7,199 Times in 1,997 Posts
|
|
I don't know if you'd like the "rounded edge triangle" shape of the V8, but it isn't backcut.
|

12-02-2019, 11:55 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 3,452
Liked 24,171 Times in 6,167 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rubone
Is/was there a 627 8 shot ever made without the backcut underlug? I want an 8 shot but don't like that look at all.
|
Quite a few variations were made.
As Bullet Bob points out there was the Performance Center V-comp. The 5" was offered in silver or two-tone while the 3" was silver only
Then there was the 6" Performance Center Heavy Hunter
There was also a 4" heavy barrel, production 8 shot Model 627, product code 163357
Here is the factory spec sheet:
http://calzaretta.com/scans/163357.pdf
In addition to all of those stainless steel offerings listed above, there were also 6 carbon steel 8 shot offerings that had the old standard tapered barrel. These were offered in blue and nickel
There might be others, but they do not come to mind at the moment
__________________
"Acta non verba"
Last edited by colt_saa; 12-03-2019 at 12:18 AM.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-25-2019, 06:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: above ground, under water
Posts: 843
Likes: 940
Liked 755 Times in 307 Posts
|
|
627 8x pro 4” over the rest
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-25-2019, 08:42 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nevada
Posts: 564
Likes: 928
Liked 335 Times in 175 Posts
|
|
I chose the 4" Pro 627.
The trigger feeling, looks, balance, and overall, everything else just feels great.
It was fairly easy to find a holster to my liking.
I prefer shooting the 627 Pro 4" compared to my 586 L-Comp; Mod. 66-2 2.5"; and 640 Pro; but the other three conceal much better.
On my 627, I've replaced the front sight with a taller brass bead as, with supplied red ramp sight, I had the rear sight adjusted all the way down. I also installed a plug kit to replace the ILS (personal preference).
__________________
432UC/638/642/60 + more
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-26-2019, 04:14 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.E. OKLA.
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 6,141
Liked 9,925 Times in 3,663 Posts
|
|
Nothing wrong with a 4" but I favor 5"
If you have the opportunity to handle each get the one that feels best in your hand.
As far as a Performance Center model being better than a standard production model, there's no guarantees either way.
I've bought some of each that had issues requiring unnecessary extra work to make them right. As always, inspect carefully before buying, no matter which you go with.
My 627PC shoots great but I'll put my 686-6 up against it any day.
.
S&W 5" revolvers
.
.
__________________
Waiting for the break of day
Last edited by BLUEDOT37; 12-29-2019 at 03:27 AM.
Reason: .
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-26-2019, 06:41 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 1,883
Liked 8,232 Times in 2,112 Posts
|
|
I got my 627PC 5" for less than $800 used. Really it was just dirty and not very well cared for. It cleaned up pretty well. One of the earlier -5s that had both Hogues and Ahrends RB grips that I swapped for Cordia R-to-S.
After polishing flutes + barrel flats, plugging the lock, switching grips:
Re: it vs. the Pro, I like the moonclips and the 5" barrel balances very well. Some feel the opposite and go for the Pro.
__________________
Psalm 27:2
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-27-2019, 08:07 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,422
Likes: 1,574
Liked 4,314 Times in 1,826 Posts
|
|
The uses I can think of for a 8-shot .357 are:
Hunting, competition, fun,SD/carry
For the first 2 I’d go PC, for the third either would do, the last Id pick the Pro.
|

12-27-2019, 10:48 AM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 907
Likes: 628
Liked 897 Times in 427 Posts
|
|
I have a pro and have been completely satisfied. I use it in USPSA and other outlaw matches. Fun gun.
Also had an additional cylinder machined to accept 38 super, 9mm, etc and shoot it now with 9mm in those games. With 147 gr bullets found virtually no POA/ POI difference.
__________________
Guns + Dogs= Bliss
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-27-2019, 01:51 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Illinois
Posts: 240
Likes: 802
Liked 513 Times in 155 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by L-2
I chose the 4" Pro 627.
The trigger feeling, looks, balance, and overall, everything else just feels great.
It was fairly easy to find a holster to my liking.
I prefer shooting the 627 Pro 4" compared to my 586 L-Comp; Mod. 66-2 2.5"; and 640 Pro; but the other three conceal much better.
On my 627, I've replaced the front sight with a taller brass bead as, with supplied red ramp sight, I had the rear sight adjusted all the way down. I also installed a plug kit to replace the ILS (personal preference).
|
Not to derail the thread, but what specifically do you like about your 627 over your L comp?
I want a 7 or 8 shooter, but haven’t made up my mind.
|

12-27-2019, 09:04 PM
|
 |
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 779
Likes: 1,121
Liked 1,112 Times in 433 Posts
|
|
Good idea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanners Owner
I have a pro and have been completely satisfied. I use it in USPSA and other outlaw matches. Fun gun.
Also had an additional cylinder machined to accept 38 super, 9mm, etc and shoot it now with 9mm in those games. With 147 gr bullets found virtually no POA/ POI difference.
|
Great idea. Where did you find the cylinder? Who did your work?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

12-28-2019, 11:32 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 907
Likes: 628
Liked 897 Times in 427 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by reccpd101
Great idea. Where did you find the cylinder? Who did your work?
|
Mark at Pinnacle high performance did it for me. He located the cylinder too- was very pleased all around with work and cust Service, communication.
Home - Pinnacle High PerformancePinnacle High Performance | Custom revolvers, revolver gunsmith
The thread on my journey is here:
Converting my 627 to shoot 9mm
We’re I to convert a revolver again, Mark would be on my speed dial.
__________________
Guns + Dogs= Bliss
Last edited by Tanners Owner; 12-29-2019 at 11:25 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-29-2019, 12:34 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 3,452
Liked 24,171 Times in 6,167 Posts
|
|
Mark at Pinnacle has rechamberd two of my 627 cylinders for 9x23 Winshester. The work is out standing and there is nowhere else I would go
The oldest rechambering was a decade or more ago. The stainless unfluted cylinder is the original 357 Magnum cylinder that the revolver shipped with. The black fluted cylinder is the rechambered one
I recently set up this 627 V-comp because I was thinking about pin shooting. The cylinder work was done about 3 years ago. In this conversion, both cylinders are visually the same.
As to finding cylinders, they are out there. Watch eBay and GunBroker and the various parts sites and you will find them from time to time. Many gunsmiths or S&W Armorers can get one from the factory. I think I have three or four 627 cylinders in my workroom waiting for me to buy revolvers for them
__________________
"Acta non verba"
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|

12-29-2019, 09:00 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 173
Likes: 177
Liked 60 Times in 38 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanners Owner
|
No one better than Mark.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

10-08-2024, 02:48 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 3
Likes: 2
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
What are the brand wood grips on the bottom pic?
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|