Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2021, 07:48 PM
Shaky Town Shaky Town is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire

Hi,
I just purchased two Smith .22’s, the 43c and the 63. I took them to the range today shooting, (both pistols had just been cleaned), and was disappointed at the number of misfires I had in both guns, which makes me look at the ammo, which was the standard velocity CCI lead nose. The misfires seemed to be the same with both pistols. Sometimes 3 out of the 8 would not fire. Sometimes all 8 would fire. Some cases were hit, but didn’t fire. I didn’t have the tight case ejection problem that many have had. Then we put these “duds” into my son’s SR22, and they all fired. Also, the trigger on the 43c would stick all the way back, and fail to reset forward without me having to force it. This happened a bunch of times, even before changing the two springs. Today was the second day at the range for the 43c, and the first for the model 63. So the 43c had the same issues on the first trip as today.
Heellp!
I installed a #8, and a #13 spring in the 43c, felt great, but the model 63 is stock.
What do you think?
Thank you

Update on the model 63:
Problem found-the hammer is just knicking the hammer shroud before striking the pin, thereby reducing the hammer force, hence the misfires. Yes, brand new pistol shouldn’t have left the factory like this. Looking at the gun from the rear, I can see that the opening where the hammer enters the shroud, was not machined correctly.

Last edited by Shaky Town; 11-01-2021 at 07:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 11-01-2021, 07:49 AM
Kansasgunner Kansasgunner is offline
SWCA Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 15,340
Liked 7,228 Times in 1,072 Posts
Default

First thing let me welcome you to the forum. I have 43c and Model 63. My 43c is bone stock purchased new and I have never had a failure to fire with any brand of ammo that I have run thru it. My four inch 63 was purchased used and someone had “lightened “ the trigger, it would exhibit the issues you are having. A trip to my favorite smith and new Wolf springs completely solved all my problems.
I bought a used 2” Mod. 63 this year and no issues at all with this one.
My recommendation would be a trip to a good revolver smith for complete strip, clean and new springs. If you purchased one or both new I would contact S&W directly for a factory inspection and repair.
__________________
Tim
SWCA #2697
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 11-01-2021, 09:00 AM
mikerjf mikerjf is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 2,761
Liked 3,501 Times in 1,298 Posts
Default

I feel you're taking a chance with lighter springs in a .22. Go back to stock and retest... CCI is normally pretty good.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2021, 09:03 AM
Breakaway500's Avatar
Breakaway500 Breakaway500 is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Whiskey Hill Ma.
Posts: 3,113
Likes: 17,933
Liked 10,286 Times in 2,229 Posts
Default

I purchased a "like new" 43c of GB. First thing I noticed was the easy trigger pull. Sure enough..about a 50% failure to fire. I purchased a new genuine S&W 43C mainspring from Numrich (S&W would not sell me one..they wanted the gun sent to them) and FTF rate dropped to zero. Yes..it's now a "heavy" trigger..but it always goes bang.
__________________
Remain Viable
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 11-01-2021, 10:21 AM
colt_saa's Avatar
colt_saa colt_saa is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 3,452
Liked 24,170 Times in 6,167 Posts
Default

Welcome to the Forum

Glad the problem with the 63 is resolved

I have to agree with testing the 43 with stock springs. The trigger sticking in the rearward position is almost always due to a rebound spring that is too light, had some coils clipped off it or both

Tuesday I had my 8 shot 63 to the range and it fired every round. I was not even shooting the good stuff in it, most of the ammunition was Winchester Wildcat and other partial boxes of 22 that were around the hobby room

I do always run at least a cylinder full of the Hollow Points before the day is out and they too ran just fine
I have been shooting 34s and 63s for 25+ years now and I can not recall having chronic misfire problems with any of them, but I have Never tried to lighten the trigger pulls on them

My oldest 22/32 Kit Gun left the Factory in 1954 and neither myself nor the previous owner has a bad thing to say about it

__________________
"Acta non verba"
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 11-02-2021, 11:31 AM
Shaky Town Shaky Town is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Thanks everyone,
I mentioned that the 43c was jamming with the stock springs as well.
So, anyway I called Smith yesterday.
Both brand new revolvers are shipping back to them today for a look see, very nice.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg C364051A-EB5A-44A8-8EDF-29707D6A2210.jpg (46.1 KB, 66 views)
File Type: jpg C0D27B3B-8689-4BAF-BDD4-E612B29662BC.jpg (45.2 KB, 63 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 11-02-2021, 12:37 PM
petepeterson's Avatar
petepeterson petepeterson is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,318
Likes: 6,930
Liked 5,471 Times in 2,104 Posts
Default

I have a brandy new 43c that I'm not crazy about either. I get Mini-mags to go BANG everytime, but most of budget-type ammo is hit or miss.
It's ok for carrying around the property, where most of the shots are for fun, but not bet-your-life against some aggressive squirrel.
__________________
Because of the metric system?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #8  
Old 11-02-2021, 01:31 PM
riverrat38 riverrat38 is offline
US Veteran
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: La Conner, WA
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 10,397
Liked 2,270 Times in 1,017 Posts
Default

I have a 43C that fires CCI Velocitator and their standard velocity ammo every time, but I get 5% miss fires with some other "cheap" ammo.
I do get sticky extraction after 100 rounds though. I carry some cleaning tools in my range bag, and a little cleaning fixes the problem. I think it's because the Alum chambers and the brass cases experience "galling". A common problem with Alum.

73,
Rick

Last edited by riverrat38; 11-02-2021 at 01:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-03-2021, 06:28 PM
Lobster Picnic Lobster Picnic is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 385
Liked 997 Times in 540 Posts
Default

My 63-5 and 351c (.22WMR) are bone-stock. The triggers are not great, the 351c being especially heavy, but they go bang with everything I feed them.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-03-2021, 06:38 PM
ken158 ken158 is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 1,564
Liked 4,966 Times in 2,108 Posts
Default

And so is the problem with J frame rimfire… The factory would rather have the gun fire every time and therefore install springs that will allow 100% then produce a light trigger that is not reliable. When individuals start putting J frame springs in a rimfire, this almost always happens.
__________________
S&W factory revolver armorer
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-03-2021, 08:35 PM
pharmer's Avatar
pharmer pharmer is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 28 N, 81W
Posts: 9,505
Likes: 10,010
Liked 15,978 Times in 5,075 Posts
Default

S&W also have made their guns with "round nose" firing pins. Rimfires should have "chisel" point FP's to cut down on misfires. Then again, the current crop of rimfire ammo seems to have a fail rate approaching 1%. Joe
__________________
Behavior Creates Destiny
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 11-03-2021, 08:46 PM
armorer951's Avatar
armorer951 armorer951 is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Evansville, Indiana USA
Posts: 6,341
Likes: 498
Liked 11,810 Times in 3,627 Posts
Default

Looking at the photos in post #6, it appears someone cycled the action under spring tension with the sideplate off, causing the hammer to impact the frame.
__________________
Ret. LE, FA Instr, S&W Armorer
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-03-2021, 10:03 PM
Pisgah Pisgah is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 3,639
Likes: 62
Liked 5,913 Times in 1,914 Posts
Default

Small frame .22's are bult with heavy springs for a reason, to make up for the lack of mass in the gun. It's like trying to use an aluminum anvil -- you have to use one heckuva hammer swing. For 100% reliability I long ago found it best to leave the springs alone, and concentrate on eliminating friction in the action as much as possible. The honing makes the action a bit easier to take, and it goes bang every time.
__________________
Pisgah
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #14  
Old 09-03-2024, 09:58 AM
ClintH ClintH is offline
Member
Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire Models 43c and 63 so many fails to fire  
Join Date: Aug 2024
Posts: 39
Likes: 13
Liked 42 Times in 18 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pisgah View Post
Small frame .22's are bult with heavy springs for a reason, to make up for the lack of mass in the gun. It's like trying to use an aluminum anvil -- you have to use one heckuva hammer swing. For 100% reliability I long ago found it best to leave the springs alone, and concentrate on eliminating friction in the action as much as possible. The honing makes the action a bit easier to take, and it goes bang every time.
Me not being a gunsmith yes I could take the gun apart and put it all back together no problem but for $700 should I have to? I have never had to take a brand new gun apart and replace anything. My new 43C really makes me sad and I really really love the gun.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M&P Pro fails to fire after mag change Mariner711 Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 1 05-12-2016 11:52 AM
new 15 sport, fails to fire Virgil1 Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 11 02-11-2016 11:15 AM
Model 36 Fails to Fire! dubious S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 19 04-16-2014 11:49 AM
642 Fails to Fire with UMC +p Gardien S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 16 05-12-2009 09:10 AM
M-18 fails to fire dan1775 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3 03-22-2009 04:36 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM.


© 2000-2025 smith-wessonforum.com All rights reserved worldwide.
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)