460 XVR Performance Ctr Vs. Non-PC

dwever

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
881
Reaction score
1,003
Location
Matsu Valley, Alaska
I'm posting quite a few questions after a 460 PC purchase Thursday. Thanks for your patience.

Have had good luck with S&W PC revolvers over the years including a 627 8 Shot; 629 with 7.5" barrel for hunting in Alabama; an R8; and a non-PC 586L I kept in my patrol car back in the day.

I have lived in Alaska now for a few years, and Thursday I stepped up to a Perf. Ctr. .460 XVR w/chest rig primarily for Bear defense. Now I'm thinking about a compensated .460 XVR for hunting with a 5" compensated barrel. There's one at Arctic Ammo here in Wasilla, it is non-Perf. Ctr., and what am I losing with a non-performance center gun if anything? The action is just about as nice as the PC, maybe not quite as smooth but lighter. Will it give the same precision and long-life of the Performance Center version?

I hadn't planned on buying number two until next year except ironically now there's a chance the other one is going to S&W to get warranty work.

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-10-17 at 3.30.24 PM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2022-10-17 at 3.30.24 PM.jpg
    22.7 KB · Views: 8
  • 22EF207F-9C30-45B9-A175-E3067FEA1F3C.jpg
    22EF207F-9C30-45B9-A175-E3067FEA1F3C.jpg
    52.4 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I can’t imagine that the longevity of the action would differ between pc and non-pc guns of the same model.

I’m skeptical that today’s pc guns are noticeably different (let alone better) from the non-pc guns.

I think the pc designation is more a promotional gimmick than any significant improvement over the regular model.
 
We have the 3.5" PC and the regular 8.375".
Both triggers are excellent.

The 5" will handle a bit easier than the 8.375" but the longer one has a velocity advantage.

White grip, under construction, was designed for the 3.5" with gloves for carry.
Semi-ambidextrous.
 

Attachments

  • 9A633622-47F9-4EFA-A0FF-8E4EF907F0EB.jpg
    9A633622-47F9-4EFA-A0FF-8E4EF907F0EB.jpg
    90.7 KB · Views: 12

Latest posts

Back
Top