...and the debate continues. There is an interesting comment found in the March/April 2009 issue of American Handgunner.
On page 65 there is a picture associated with the article "S&W's Performance Center." The article was written by Roy Huntington.
The caption for the pic reads "Forged Performance Center (PC) parts on the left, MIM factory parts on the right. Is there a difference? The PC thinks so and spares no expense."
I have taken that to mean that while not necessarily bad, MIM parts are certainly not the best, at least not according to the very factory selling them.
While I have yet to read the article I don't see how I could take that comment out of context. It could be viewed as a slap in the face to many who have bought MIM equipped pistols after Smith said there was nothing wrong with them, only to refuse to use them in their premier line.
Of course it's up to you to buy what makes you feel good.
On page 65 there is a picture associated with the article "S&W's Performance Center." The article was written by Roy Huntington.
The caption for the pic reads "Forged Performance Center (PC) parts on the left, MIM factory parts on the right. Is there a difference? The PC thinks so and spares no expense."
I have taken that to mean that while not necessarily bad, MIM parts are certainly not the best, at least not according to the very factory selling them.
While I have yet to read the article I don't see how I could take that comment out of context. It could be viewed as a slap in the face to many who have bought MIM equipped pistols after Smith said there was nothing wrong with them, only to refuse to use them in their premier line.
Of course it's up to you to buy what makes you feel good.