arizona98tj
US Veteran
While at Cabela's last week, I picked up a carton of the CCI AR Tactical .22LR. I took it with me to the range today and after working through some hand-loads for my M&P15, I switched over to the M&P15-22 to see how this CCI ammo worked.
The 15-22 had been cleaned prior to the last range trip and had not more than 100 rounds through it.
I fired a string of Walmart obtained Federal Bulk ammo to establish a baseline for how things were working today.
The Federal ammo clocked in with a 10 shot group at 1193 FPS, SD of 25.7 FPS, and an extreme spread of 70.6 FPS.
The AR Tactical ammo clocked in with a 10 shot group at 1154 FPS, SD of 7.9, and an extreme spread of 21.9 FPS.
Without going any further, it is easy to see that the CCI ammo is much more consistent than the Federal.
The orange target dots are 1" in diameter. They provide a reasonably small target for 50 yard shots with low magnification scopes.
My M&P15-22 is equipped with a Millet DSM-1 1-4x optic. I was running it at 4x for all of the shots fired. 10 rounds were loaded into a 25 round magazine. I used a GripPod for the forward support (I need to get a short 10 round mag) and used the green sand bag for rear support.
Here is the Federal Bulk target, shot at 50 yards. I checked my records and this particular string was a bit on the larger side (by slightly less than 1") than what I have shot before at 50 yards with this rifle, albeit I was using a Leupold scope at 7x. The problem with Federal is that it is not really consistent, as was proven by the above chronograph numbers.
Here is the CCI AR Tactical ammo, shot at 50 yards.
Here is the CCI AR Tactical ammo, shot at 25 yards.
No, I didn't monitor the temperature, barometric pressure, note the altitude, or even stick up a wet finger for a relative wind direction indication.
I now do know that this new CCI bulk ammo runs better in the 15-22 than any of the other bulk ammo I have tried. It is NOT as accurate as some of the ammo I have previously tried, but then again, the Ely target ammo is about 4 times more expensive and only bested the CCI by about .4".
The 15-22 had been cleaned prior to the last range trip and had not more than 100 rounds through it.
I fired a string of Walmart obtained Federal Bulk ammo to establish a baseline for how things were working today.
The Federal ammo clocked in with a 10 shot group at 1193 FPS, SD of 25.7 FPS, and an extreme spread of 70.6 FPS.
The AR Tactical ammo clocked in with a 10 shot group at 1154 FPS, SD of 7.9, and an extreme spread of 21.9 FPS.
Without going any further, it is easy to see that the CCI ammo is much more consistent than the Federal.
The orange target dots are 1" in diameter. They provide a reasonably small target for 50 yard shots with low magnification scopes.
My M&P15-22 is equipped with a Millet DSM-1 1-4x optic. I was running it at 4x for all of the shots fired. 10 rounds were loaded into a 25 round magazine. I used a GripPod for the forward support (I need to get a short 10 round mag) and used the green sand bag for rear support.

Here is the Federal Bulk target, shot at 50 yards. I checked my records and this particular string was a bit on the larger side (by slightly less than 1") than what I have shot before at 50 yards with this rifle, albeit I was using a Leupold scope at 7x. The problem with Federal is that it is not really consistent, as was proven by the above chronograph numbers.

Here is the CCI AR Tactical ammo, shot at 50 yards.

Here is the CCI AR Tactical ammo, shot at 25 yards.

No, I didn't monitor the temperature, barometric pressure, note the altitude, or even stick up a wet finger for a relative wind direction indication.
I now do know that this new CCI bulk ammo runs better in the 15-22 than any of the other bulk ammo I have tried. It is NOT as accurate as some of the ammo I have previously tried, but then again, the Ely target ammo is about 4 times more expensive and only bested the CCI by about .4".
Last edited: