hey15-22
Member
I spent so much time researching what tactical .22 rifle to get, I thought maybe someone might benefit from it (even if your needs are different).
I narrowed it down to the SW 15-22 and the Sig 522 for numerous reasons. (Yes the 10/22 was an option, but some had to be eliminated).
Reasons to buy a .22 rifle(not just a tactical rifle).
A. There are many reasons and that can be different for everyone. In order of importance for me.
1. Wanted to get the wife shooting without the recoil and fear of handguns.
2. I wanted one for trigger time. I will probably never own a .223/.556, so platform was not a factor here. (My center fire rifle will be a 9mm Carbine, Ok I guess that could end up being an AR Platform, but probably won't).
3. Looks. Good, bad or indifferent as a reason, I just like the look of the 15-22.
4. Survival Gun.
Variables for buying a tactical .22:
B. Reliability.
The Sig, from my research is probably a tad bit more reliable because its receiver is aluminum. The 15-22 POI (flexing) changing is well documented.
1. The firearm had to function for my wife. Both to learn on and for home protection (Yes I know, but if it's the only firearm she is not afraid of then so be it. Better than a rock).
2. I hate wasting money. No one wants to invest their money in anything that isn't going to work. There are plenty of reliable 22 rifles, but the list of 'tactical' reliable rifles seem to be short.
C. Weight: The 15-22 is about a pound lighter. Wow. And its extremely noticeable. I was really debating this variable as it has pros and cons.
1. Lighter is better for my wife to hold. Win 15-22
3. Heavier has less recoil and might make it easier to shoot for my wife. Win 522
4. Lighter is better for a survival/hiking/camping gun. Win 15-22
5. Heavier might mean more durable, certainly the receiver being made out of aluminum has the appearance of being more durable. Win 522.
6. Heavier = more accurate? There is plenty of information on the 15-22 flexing (some of it is tied to a loose barrel nut), but from what I am seeing the 522 is more accurate, especially at distance. Win 522
D. Survival gun: I feel the BOB thing is a bit over played, but they mean the same thing. It seems like most of the BOB community is realizing that if they had to leave, carrying ammo is heavy and the only true option here (without a humvee) is a .22. The 15-22 is lighter for sure. Actually for a true BOB gun I would look to another option that didn't have such a tactical look.
E. Tactical look. This has both pro's and con's.
1. I like the AR look.
2. The Sig is definitely not as "scary" looking.
2. Yes in a pinch it might be enough to scare someone off. The average person will never notice the .22 magazine. They will most likely see a big bad scary black gun.
3. The con is its a big bad scary black looking gun. Taking it hiking or camping might freak some out. I like to be as low profile as possible and the 15-22 and 522 are going to stand out more than a some other options
F. Magazine:
S&W has a proprietary magazine and the Sig uses a black dog. The S&W seem reliable from all intensive purposes(as long as you load them per the manuals directions), but there are pros and cons for both systems.
1. Sig mags are notoriously reliable.
2. Sig mags are closed to keep out dirt. S&W mags are open.
3. S&W mags easier to load because of load assist buttons (important for my wife)
F. Price. The Sig is cheaper. For what I paid for my MOE. I could have gotten a double barrel Sig 522. I was about to buy a Commando Sig as it was $100 cheaper ( I paid almost full MSRP to get an MOE here in CA).
G. Accessories. Hands down the 15-22 wins. Being an AR platform. Most accessories will fit (hand guards being the acceptation and no you can not interchange uppers and lowers).
H. Accuracy:
This was a non issue for me, but its important to many. While there are some on here grouping very nicely, the fact is the 15-22 is not a tack driver. From my research the 522 is a much more accurate rifle. And if you really want to do long distance shooting for accuracy there are better options than the tactical .22 rifles out there.
I. Last round Lock open and bolt release.
1. Both have a last round lock back. The 15-22 is a true lock back, where the 522 locks back on the magazine.
2. Both have a bolt release button that works. The 522 can be manually locked back and then the bolt release will work.
This was the Deciding factor for me. I just couldn't get past the Sig locking open on the magazine. It really just bothered me and in the end it was a deal breaker. I had the Sig in my hand and almost told them to wrap it up.
Wrap up:
In the end it was a hodge podge of reasons that were in my wife's best interests and my own "wants and needs".
To me the S&W 15-22 wins on: Light weight and looks. Accessories while not important to me, is a hands down winner.
The S&W 15-22 loses with on the flex issue and it also loses on price(at least in my area, SF Bay Area)
The Sig 522 wins on "quality" and it being more accurate at distance. Some will see the magazine choice a big win too.
The Sig loses on the faux lock back (I won't say it loses on weight because some might want a heavier gun). Which as stated was the deal killer for me.
Hope someone finds this useful. It got way longer than I thought it would. Its amazing how much thought can go into a purchase.
The best part is, mine is still in jail. I can pick it up Thursday after 4:15PM PST.
And thanks to everyone who contributes to this forum.
I narrowed it down to the SW 15-22 and the Sig 522 for numerous reasons. (Yes the 10/22 was an option, but some had to be eliminated).
Reasons to buy a .22 rifle(not just a tactical rifle).
A. There are many reasons and that can be different for everyone. In order of importance for me.
1. Wanted to get the wife shooting without the recoil and fear of handguns.
2. I wanted one for trigger time. I will probably never own a .223/.556, so platform was not a factor here. (My center fire rifle will be a 9mm Carbine, Ok I guess that could end up being an AR Platform, but probably won't).
3. Looks. Good, bad or indifferent as a reason, I just like the look of the 15-22.
4. Survival Gun.
Variables for buying a tactical .22:
B. Reliability.
The Sig, from my research is probably a tad bit more reliable because its receiver is aluminum. The 15-22 POI (flexing) changing is well documented.
1. The firearm had to function for my wife. Both to learn on and for home protection (Yes I know, but if it's the only firearm she is not afraid of then so be it. Better than a rock).
2. I hate wasting money. No one wants to invest their money in anything that isn't going to work. There are plenty of reliable 22 rifles, but the list of 'tactical' reliable rifles seem to be short.
C. Weight: The 15-22 is about a pound lighter. Wow. And its extremely noticeable. I was really debating this variable as it has pros and cons.
1. Lighter is better for my wife to hold. Win 15-22
3. Heavier has less recoil and might make it easier to shoot for my wife. Win 522
4. Lighter is better for a survival/hiking/camping gun. Win 15-22
5. Heavier might mean more durable, certainly the receiver being made out of aluminum has the appearance of being more durable. Win 522.
6. Heavier = more accurate? There is plenty of information on the 15-22 flexing (some of it is tied to a loose barrel nut), but from what I am seeing the 522 is more accurate, especially at distance. Win 522
D. Survival gun: I feel the BOB thing is a bit over played, but they mean the same thing. It seems like most of the BOB community is realizing that if they had to leave, carrying ammo is heavy and the only true option here (without a humvee) is a .22. The 15-22 is lighter for sure. Actually for a true BOB gun I would look to another option that didn't have such a tactical look.
E. Tactical look. This has both pro's and con's.
1. I like the AR look.
2. The Sig is definitely not as "scary" looking.
2. Yes in a pinch it might be enough to scare someone off. The average person will never notice the .22 magazine. They will most likely see a big bad scary black gun.
3. The con is its a big bad scary black looking gun. Taking it hiking or camping might freak some out. I like to be as low profile as possible and the 15-22 and 522 are going to stand out more than a some other options
F. Magazine:
S&W has a proprietary magazine and the Sig uses a black dog. The S&W seem reliable from all intensive purposes(as long as you load them per the manuals directions), but there are pros and cons for both systems.
1. Sig mags are notoriously reliable.
2. Sig mags are closed to keep out dirt. S&W mags are open.
3. S&W mags easier to load because of load assist buttons (important for my wife)
F. Price. The Sig is cheaper. For what I paid for my MOE. I could have gotten a double barrel Sig 522. I was about to buy a Commando Sig as it was $100 cheaper ( I paid almost full MSRP to get an MOE here in CA).
G. Accessories. Hands down the 15-22 wins. Being an AR platform. Most accessories will fit (hand guards being the acceptation and no you can not interchange uppers and lowers).
H. Accuracy:
This was a non issue for me, but its important to many. While there are some on here grouping very nicely, the fact is the 15-22 is not a tack driver. From my research the 522 is a much more accurate rifle. And if you really want to do long distance shooting for accuracy there are better options than the tactical .22 rifles out there.
I. Last round Lock open and bolt release.
1. Both have a last round lock back. The 15-22 is a true lock back, where the 522 locks back on the magazine.
2. Both have a bolt release button that works. The 522 can be manually locked back and then the bolt release will work.
This was the Deciding factor for me. I just couldn't get past the Sig locking open on the magazine. It really just bothered me and in the end it was a deal breaker. I had the Sig in my hand and almost told them to wrap it up.
Wrap up:
In the end it was a hodge podge of reasons that were in my wife's best interests and my own "wants and needs".
To me the S&W 15-22 wins on: Light weight and looks. Accessories while not important to me, is a hands down winner.
The S&W 15-22 loses with on the flex issue and it also loses on price(at least in my area, SF Bay Area)
The Sig 522 wins on "quality" and it being more accurate at distance. Some will see the magazine choice a big win too.
The Sig loses on the faux lock back (I won't say it loses on weight because some might want a heavier gun). Which as stated was the deal killer for me.
Hope someone finds this useful. It got way longer than I thought it would. Its amazing how much thought can go into a purchase.
The best part is, mine is still in jail. I can pick it up Thursday after 4:15PM PST.
And thanks to everyone who contributes to this forum.
Last edited: