Recently bought MP 40 full size Put 80 rounds Winchester 180 grain white box thru it could not hit a thing with it My wife has a 9C .I have no problems holding 2 inch group with it Looking for any advice on possible mods Trigger or Sights ? Is it ammo specific Or do i just need to shoot the hell out of it
MP 40 accuracy
- Thread starter BOBB BB
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Rastoff
US Veteran
Did you shoot it from a bench rest or just standing?
Deadeye Dick
Member
Can you be a little more specific? What distance from the target? Standing two handed isosceles style or rested on a bag from a bench? Where you getting any kind of a group or were your shots all over the place. Are you right or left handed? If you had groups were they low left, low center, etc.?
smitret
Member
40 accuracy problem
Flinch anticipating recoil maybe?
Good Luck
Flinch anticipating recoil maybe?
Good Luck
greybeard43
Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2011
- Messages
- 78
- Reaction score
- 15
Try a 165 gr load. The recoil is in my opinion "soft". The muzzle energy rivals a 357 magnum with the 125 gr bullet. I don't mind shooting my shield 40 at all. At 7 yds which is in my opinion about as far as you need for civilian self defense I can keep them all in the kill zone.
Granite Stater
Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Messages
- 93
- Reaction score
- 29
My M&P 40 from 2007 is exceptionally accurate, 165 & 180 grain loads. Try different backstraps and benching it. Also if you have dummy rounds mix some into the mag and see if your flinching or pushing the gun.
turbo38gn
US Veteran
Shooting a 9mm and a 40SW are 2 completely different experiences. The 40 often will make a 9mm shooter cry after shooting it. Keep at it and try resting on a sand bag to keep it steady and really work at your trigger control. I remember shooting my M&P in 357 sig the 1st time, neither I nor anyone else I had shoot it were very good at it... I put it away for year, I was so disappointed.. well during that year, I shot a lot of 45acp through various guns including my TR325... when I decided to get rid of the 357 sig a year later, I brought it to the range for one more trip to get rid of the extra ammo... I was amazed, right out of the box I murdered the target, as good as any gun I shoot.. so, to sum it up, the kick going from a 9 to a 40 can make one cry... work at it, you'll get it right, the 40 M&P is one of the better guns out there..
Arik
Member
I'm not sure if this is a thing or not but it happens to me with the 40. I own several guns in 40 but they are the only ones I'm accurate with. I have a HK P2000 in 40 that's I can't miss with but my HK USP 40 I couldn't hit a single thing. My Glock 22 is very accurate but when I had a Glock 23 i was awful. Don't know why that is
rattlesnakedaddy
Member
I'd check it over to make sure everything is tight. I recently had a issue with mine while at a training class. Went from good solid hits on target early on, to my groups falling apart. It was the end of an 8 hour pistol course, and I chalked it up to fatigue. When I got home and started to take the pistol out of the range bag to clean it, I noticed the rear sight was overhanging the slide by about 1/4". It turned out the sight had come loose and could easily be moved by hand.
Mahalo_.32
Member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2015
- Messages
- 182
- Reaction score
- 132
My newly purchased 07 model .40 is EXTREMELY satisfying, I will admit I can shoot it a lot better than my GLOCK. I love this sucker!
I have both a 5" Pro Series and a Shield in .40S&W and love them both. However, the M&Ps aren't really target guns. That said, you should be able to hold acceptable self defense groups out to 25 yards or so. I shoot Winchester white box all the time and don't have a complaint about accuracy.
The triggers on M&Ps aren't the best. A lot of people on this forum, including myself, have installed trigger upgrades from Apex Tactical. I have their Duty/Carry Action Enhancement kits in both of mine and feel that has helped accuracy considerably.
This target was from 30~35 feet. I can do better with my 1911, but for a night stand gun, I'm satisfied.
The triggers on M&Ps aren't the best. A lot of people on this forum, including myself, have installed trigger upgrades from Apex Tactical. I have their Duty/Carry Action Enhancement kits in both of mine and feel that has helped accuracy considerably.
This target was from 30~35 feet. I can do better with my 1911, but for a night stand gun, I'm satisfied.
Fastbolt
Member
I took my newly issued (NIB) M&P40 and fired it the same day I took it out of the box, and then again the next day, using a mix of current and previous duty loads (180gr). While I'd field-stripped it and checked for anything visibly amiss before shooting it, I didn't lubricate it for the first session (and it was essentially bone dry).
Both times I was pleasantly surprised by the practical accuracy. I found it a bit more enjoyable to shoot than my well-worn M&P40c (from 2010), and even my well-used M&P45 ('08). Of course, I also liked using a T&E Shield 40 more than my 40c (again, with 180gr loads), which seemed a bit odd, at first.
Let's just say that making called hits on wooden clothespins (holding the paper targets on the cardboard back board), shooting 2-handed, unsupported, was an enjoyable way to test my shooting with the new duty gun once the qual shooting was out of the way. Nice.
Another of the senior instructors, who owns a M&P40 & M&P45, said his M&P40 is the softest shooting duty-size .40 he's ever fired, and also has no complaints about the inherent & practical accuracy.
if I had any more interest in owning a service-size, hi-cap pistol, I'd be hard pressed to decide between the M&P9 5" Pro and the current standard M&P40, as I've enjoyed using examples of both on the range. The new production M&P9 5" Pro I was trying (belongs to yet another instructor) almost makes it seem like having an unfair advantage.
Both times I was pleasantly surprised by the practical accuracy. I found it a bit more enjoyable to shoot than my well-worn M&P40c (from 2010), and even my well-used M&P45 ('08). Of course, I also liked using a T&E Shield 40 more than my 40c (again, with 180gr loads), which seemed a bit odd, at first.
Let's just say that making called hits on wooden clothespins (holding the paper targets on the cardboard back board), shooting 2-handed, unsupported, was an enjoyable way to test my shooting with the new duty gun once the qual shooting was out of the way. Nice.
Another of the senior instructors, who owns a M&P40 & M&P45, said his M&P40 is the softest shooting duty-size .40 he's ever fired, and also has no complaints about the inherent & practical accuracy.
if I had any more interest in owning a service-size, hi-cap pistol, I'd be hard pressed to decide between the M&P9 5" Pro and the current standard M&P40, as I've enjoyed using examples of both on the range. The new production M&P9 5" Pro I was trying (belongs to yet another instructor) almost makes it seem like having an unfair advantage.
Last edited:
