I took my newly issued (NIB) M&P40 and fired it the same day I took it out of the box, and then again the next day, using a mix of current and previous duty loads (180gr). While I'd field-stripped it and checked for anything visibly amiss before shooting it, I didn't lubricate it for the first session (and it was essentially bone dry).
Both times I was pleasantly surprised by the practical accuracy. I found it a bit more enjoyable to shoot than my well-worn M&P40c (from 2010), and even my well-used M&P45 ('08). Of course, I also liked using a T&E Shield 40 more than my 40c (again, with 180gr loads), which seemed a bit odd, at first.
Let's just say that making called hits on wooden clothespins (holding the paper targets on the cardboard back board), shooting 2-handed, unsupported, was an enjoyable way to test my shooting with the new duty gun once the qual shooting was out of the way. Nice.
Another of the senior instructors, who owns a M&P40 & M&P45, said his M&P40 is the softest shooting duty-size .40 he's ever fired, and also has no complaints about the inherent & practical accuracy.
if I had any more interest in owning a service-size, hi-cap pistol, I'd be hard pressed to decide between the M&P9 5" Pro and the current standard M&P40, as I've enjoyed using examples of both on the range. The new production M&P9 5" Pro I was trying (belongs to yet another instructor) almost makes it seem like having an unfair advantage.
