Bodyguard 2.0 .380 best ammo?

bigbob76

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
57
Reaction score
29
Location
Southern California
I don't think hollow points would be a good choice. I suspect they would not expand being fired from such a short barrel. I want to buy enough of whatever ammo seems best so I can test it for reliability before carrying it. Thanks, Bob
 
Due to the number of reported issues with ammo NOT feeding properly, for my carry I will only load it with “high quality” round nose FMJ. Also, with my own experience with FTF even after 500 rounds, I will load the mags with 1 less round = 10-round mag with 9, 12-round mag with 11.

My BG2 will NOT be my EDC until I have 250 to 500 more rounds without ANY issues to perform 100% as a pocket carry close encounter self-defense handgun.
 
I don't think hollow points would be a good choice. I suspect they would not expand being fired from such a short barrel. I want to buy enough of whatever ammo seems best so I can test it for reliability before carrying it. Thanks, Bob
There are plenty of YouTube videos of ammo gelatin and reliability tests out there to help guide a decision.
 
According to some studies, there is an ammo company called "Precision One" that is makes a superior .380 round.

I have fired a few hundred rounds of it without a single problem, but it is more expensive and not widely distributed by the ammo seller websites; you can only buy it on their own website.
 
When you have an hour or so free time, there is a series on a site called Shooting The Bull. A series called Ammo Quest tested many different .380 rounds. If you search for his .380 tests you will find a number of videos and written material. He does testing per the FBI protocol and I found it both interesting and informative.

There is little real life data concerning which .380 rounds worked in real life scenarios. So, the next best thing is correctly done FBI protocol gels tests. That is what Shooting the Bull provides.

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LczfeWK9lHw[/ame]
 
Last edited:
Hydra Shock Deep is the new kid on the block and has good results in testing.

In my LCP Max I prefer the Fiocchi Extrema which uses the Hornady XTP bullet. Decent expansion and good penetration. Even if it doesn't expand it doesn't tend to over penetrate.

If choosing a FMJ the Winchester round with a flat point would be my choice.
 
I've been running these Precision One XTP 90gr +P ammo for a while now in my BG 2.0. I also run these in my LCP Custom and they run with zero issue's. I purchase these direct from their website and I've no issue's with shipping and timeliness.
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOwCXXpEP50&t=131s[/ame]

temp-Imageinm-Kgn.avif
 
Last edited:
Precision One 90gr XTP +p is in name only @ 975 fps, Underwood 90gr XTP +p is listed @ 1200 fps, I will not shoot the Undrewood.

Geezzz... I did not know that any ammo manufacturer would label their ammo with a +P and it is in "name only", and not the actual +P rated extra powder??

I learn something new every day!
 
to them the
Geezzz... I did not know that any ammo manufacturer would label their ammo with a +P and it is in "name only", and not the actual +P rated extra powder??

I learn something new every day!

Their standard load is 925 fps so bumping it up to 975 fps so in their terms they can call it a +P. Even the Winchester 95gr fmj flat nose target which I've shot a bunch is 955 fps. I consider all these safe loads, but when you get up in the 1300 fps with Underwood and the Buffalo Bore+P Ammo 100 gr. Hardcast F.N. @ 1,150 fps would be a little hard on the 2.0.
 
Geezzz... I did not know that any ammo manufacturer would label their ammo with a +P and it is in "name only", and not the actual +P rated extra powder??

I learn something new every day!

There's no official SAAMI spec for 380 +P the way that there is for 9x19, so +P simply means, 'exceeds SAAMI spec for max pressure.' Could be by a little (Precision One), could be by a lot (Underwood), buyer beware. Same deal with 9x19 +P+, except it exceeds the SAAMI spec for +P.

If you were going to shoot a lot of a load as hot as that Underwood (or 9x19 +P+), a heavier recoil spring should probably lengthen the longevity of the pistol.
 
When you have an hour or so free time, there is a series on a site called Shooting The Bull. A series called Ammo Quest tested many different .380 rounds. If you search for his .380 tests you will find a number of videos and written material. He does testing per the FBI protocol and I found it both interesting and informative.

There is little real life data concerning which .380 rounds worked in real life scenarios. So, the next best thing is correctly done FBI protocol gels tests. That is what Shooting the Bull provides.

Shooting the Bull does not do "correctly done FBI protocol" tests, although I see that posted all the time about a lot of .380 ammo. I am going to paste some stuff I have posted elsewhere.

The manufacturers and most social media influencers and hobbyists frequently conduct bare gel and cloth covered gel tests with .380 and proclaim that their tested ammo “meets FBI specifications.” Well, that is not true. They may perform barely adequately in 1/3 of the tests, but most reviewers are not performing the other 4.

As I understand the FBI protocols used for testing LE duty ammunition, 70% importance is given to penetration and consistency of penetration, 20% to expansion, and 10% to weight retention. Source: FBI Ammunition Protocol
The test involves five separate shots at 6 different sets of media, namely, bare gel, cloth covered gel, and gel placed behind each of plywood, wallboard, sheet metal (heavier 20 gauge, not the stuff I use) and windshield glass. The results are weighted based on criteria deemed important by the FBI and are cranked into a formula used to assign a number score to the ammo. In looking at the criteria in the above link (Note that the criteria are stated to be for 9mm Luger, which may be read to imply that there are different weightings for different calibers, but I do not know this.), penetration under 12 inches for any shot is assigned a point value of 1 per shot under 12 inches, while penetration over 18 inches is awarded 5 points per shot. Penetration between 12 and 18 inches is awarded points in the 8-10 range, with 14-15.99 inches getting 10 and 16 to 18 inches getting 9 points. 12 to 13.99 inches gets 8 points. There is no disqualification for penetration over 18 inches-it is awarded exactly half credit, 5. (I invite anyone who has better information on the FBI protocols to share it.)

Why are the testers ignoring the other 4 tests? Because .380 ammo that barely makes 12 inches in plain gel or cloth covered gel will suck when put through the barrier tests, losing a lot of points per shot and also on the score for number of shots per test under 12 inches. So, they focus on pretty mushrooms, which the FBI thinks is substantially less important than penetration. Now, a lot of reviewers imply that barrier penetration is not important because non-police people carrying .380s are only going to be getting in “best case scenario” shootings at 3 yards against someone facing them squarely out in the open, or against people who will run away at the sight of any gun. I also see people on forums say that their strategy with their .380 is to dump a couple of rounds and run away. Well, those ideas contain huge assumptions upon which I am not willing to rely. How does one know that there won’t be a side shot, or one through any kind of barriers? How does one know that getting away from a bad guy will not involve running over him? So, I shoot any ammo that does not receive the benefit of massive taxpayer funded research against a variety of stuff to see what it will do.

The only ammo that I have found that comes close to 9mm penetration against barriers is 68 grain XD ammo from Underwood. (I use standard pressure.) and 90 grain XP ammo. Buffalo Bore 100 grain hard cast flat point (again, I use standard pressure) is third. I carry the Underwood standard pressure 68 grain XD round in my .380s. No soft lead core ammo in either jacketed round nose or hollow point can get through the barriers I have shot, which is a piece of pine or fir 2X6 and two pieces of 22 gauge steel. I have posted links to numerous videos against those barriers on a long thread in another forum, for those who have time to burn. Attention Required! | Cloudflare

YMMV.
 
Last edited:
Cheyenne WYO:

Couldn't agree more! Have previously loaded that Lehigh 68gr bullet in 380acp, 9mm & 357 SIG (WOW!) and am about to give 38 Super a try...

The other non-conventional bullet (other than various other Lehighs:rolleyes:) I have experienced good results with in 380acp is the ARX Inceptor 56gr from Polycase. Also have loaded some In 9mm, 40 S&W, 45acp and 38 Special: all shoot well to point of aim, exhibit reduced recoil and are, IMHO, viable for HD & SD purposes.

Cheers!
 
Cheyenne WYO:

Couldn't agree more! Have previously loaded that Lehigh 68gr bullet in 380acp, 9mm & 357 SIG (WOW!) and am about to give 38 Super a try...

The other non-conventional bullet (other than various other Lehighs:rolleyes:) I have experienced good results with in 380acp is the ARX Inceptor 56gr from Polycase. Also have loaded some In 9mm, 40 S&W, 45acp and 38 Special: all shoot well to point of aim, exhibit reduced recoil and are, IMHO, viable for HD & SD purposes.

Cheers!

In duty caliber ammo I just stick with the common stuff police carry because they meet FBI protocols for all 6 tests and have been correlated with street results. (I'm not saying XD ammo won't work effectively. I just go with the known data.) But, the .380 is different because it is neither tested nor correlated.

If you go to the thread that I linked at the end of my post, I shot 9mm and .380 NOVX rounds, which fire an ARX style bullet. The 9mm performed well but the .380 went to pieces when it hit the barrier.
 
Last edited:
For me defensive wise, Hydro Shok Deep - gun quality wise should handle anything though!
 
Back
Top