Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols > Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols

Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols Other Smith & Wesson Semi-Automatic Pistols from the 1950's to Present


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2022, 08:58 AM
Waterpolo1 Waterpolo1 is offline
Member
S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659  
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Chesterfield, Va
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default S&W 659

Can the S&W 659 shoot 9MM +P ammunition safely?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 04-26-2022, 11:16 AM
rincar rincar is offline
Member
S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659  
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 455
Likes: 386
Liked 480 Times in 237 Posts
Default

The S&W manual says not to use +p. But from what I have read a small amount of +p wont damage your 659. I myself only use +p ammo in the firearm that I carry for self-defense. I practice with regular 9mm full metal jacket ammo But I always fire a few rounds of the +p ammo to insure that it functions in my carry guns. I hope this is of use to you.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 04-26-2022, 12:22 PM
georgek472 georgek472 is offline
Member
S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 150
Likes: 358
Liked 40 Times in 24 Posts
Default 659...+P ammo

Why take a chance possibly causing irrefutable damage to a fine, old, popular historical, S&W #659 auto ??? Trust me, the GAIN using +P ammo isn't worth the risk. Been there, done that.. Found out the hard way, the possibilities resulting from using +P ammo... My $0.02 worth.. I should have listened to the old timers recommendations.....
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 04-26-2022, 12:30 PM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,914
Likes: 20,119
Liked 12,097 Times in 5,487 Posts
Default

Welcome to the S&W Forums. The Model 659 has a stainless steel slide and receiver, it was the predecessor to the Model 5906. The Model 5906 can digest lots of +P ammo, so can the Model 659. Even the aluminum alloy receiver models will hold up to +P ammo, but will suffer receiver damage sooner than those with carbon or stainless steel receivers.

I would recommend frequent replacement of the recoil spring, using either genuine S&W springs or those from Wolff. With +P, I would not run more than 3000 rounds of +P before replacement. Springs are cheap, cracked receivers are expensive to repair and sometimes cannot be repaired or replaced.

Does one really need +P 9x19mm ammo these days? My answer is that with modern bullets like the Federal HST, Remington Golden Sabre, Speer Gold Dot, and Winchester Ranger-T, the answer is no. Higher velocity with these bullets usually results in faster expansion, but sometimes less penetration. The extra recoil simply does not result in better performance from modern self-defense ammo. Older hollow point designs from the 1980's through about 2000 do benefit from the extra velocity.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA

Last edited by stansdds; 04-26-2022 at 12:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 04-27-2022, 07:47 AM
Waterpolo1 Waterpolo1 is offline
Member
S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659  
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Chesterfield, Va
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rincar View Post
The S&W manual says not to use +p. But from what I have read a small amount of +p wont damage your 659. I myself only use +p ammo in the firearm that I carry for self-defense. I practice with regular 9mm full metal jacket ammo But I always fire a few rounds of the +p ammo to insure that it functions in my carry guns. I hope this is of use to you.
Thank you, My plan for using the +P is very similar to what you are doing with +P
Again, thank you for responding.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 04-27-2022, 07:53 AM
Waterpolo1 Waterpolo1 is offline
Member
S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659  
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Chesterfield, Va
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stansdds View Post
Welcome to the S&W Forums. The Model 659 has a stainless steel slide and receiver, it was the predecessor to the Model 5906. The Model 5906 can digest lots of +P ammo, so can the Model 659. Even the aluminum alloy receiver models will hold up to +P ammo, but will suffer receiver damage sooner than those with carbon or stainless steel receivers.

I would recommend frequent replacement of the recoil spring, using either genuine S&W springs or those from Wolff. With +P, I would not run more than 3000 rounds of +P before replacement. Springs are cheap, cracked receivers are expensive to repair and sometimes cannot be repaired or replaced.

Does one really need +P 9x19mm ammo these days? My answer is that with modern bullets like the Federal HST, Remington Golden Sabre, Speer Gold Dot, and Winchester Ranger-T, the answer is no. Higher velocity with these bullets usually results in faster expansion, but sometimes less penetration. The extra recoil simply does not result in better performance from modern self-defense ammo. Older hollow point designs from the 1980's through about 2000 do benefit from the extra velocity.
Thank you very much for taking your time to respond.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 04-27-2022, 09:10 AM
ispcapt ispcapt is offline
US Veteran
S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659 S&W 659  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 303
Liked 2,354 Times in 620 Posts
Default

My dept issued 5904 until going to 40. Our issued duty ammo for the 5904 was the W-W 115+P+. When we went to the 5904 several 'experts' in other depts said our 5904s would never stand up to the +P+. One of our range officers decided to see how long his 5904 would last. When he retired he had documented 80,000 +P+ thru his gun. He had replaced the barrel about 50,000 as the rifling was worn and accuracy had dropped off.
When he retired he bought that same 5904 and continued shooting it.
How long would it take you to shoot 80,000 rds? Figure the cost of 80,000 rds. 20 rd boxes of quality defensive 9mm in my area is $20-$25 a box. That's close to $100,000 for 80,000 rds. First problem will be finding 80,000 rds. Then compare the $100,000 in ammo to the $500 gun.
The 5904 is an alloy frame. Your 659 is all stainless.
Would every 5904 run 80,000 rds? No way to tell. His was issued. Nothing special, nothing hand selected.
I carried a 459 for 7 years in uniform and while on SWAT before going to the 5904/6904. The 459 is alloy frame. During that time we issued Federal 115 BPLE and W-W 115 +P+. I never kept count of the rds thru mine but I know we shot between 8,000 and 12,000 every year. I still have that 459 and shoot it regularly with W-W+P+. Have never had a single round problem with it.
There's no doubt higher pressure rounds will wear faster than lower pressure. If you never drive your car faster than 40mph you can expect it to last longer than if you always drove 80mph. But how much faster will the +P rd wear? Realistically it's not likely you'll ever shoot it enough to know.
Also, the S&W manual does not say do not to use +P ammo. It says the use of +P may affect wear characteristics. Note - the word may. Driving 80mph may cause more wear than driving 40mph.
Your 659 will last longer than you.
__________________
183rd FBINA
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 04-27-2022, 09:21 AM
Godly07 Godly07 is offline
Banned SCAMMER !!! < SCAMMER < SCAMMER < SCAMMER < SCAMMER < SCAMMER < SCAMMER < SCAMMER
SCAMMER < SCAMMER
SCAMMER < SCAMMER
SCAMMER < SCAMMER
SCAMMER < SCAMMER
S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659  
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 8
Likes: 3
Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Not advisable, it will surely damage your 659 .
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-27-2022, 12:28 PM
jimbo728's Avatar
jimbo728 jimbo728 is offline
Member
S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 8,671
Liked 3,497 Times in 1,342 Posts
Default

I shoot Nato 9mm in my 539&559, no problems.
It is not plus p.
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-27-2022, 12:28 PM
stansdds stansdds is offline
Member
S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659  
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,914
Likes: 20,119
Liked 12,097 Times in 5,487 Posts
Default

ISPCapt has been there and done that. Hands-on experience beats rumor and internet lore every day of the week and twice on Sunday.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 04-29-2022, 07:39 AM
BigBoy99's Avatar
BigBoy99 BigBoy99 is offline
US Veteran
S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SE Wisc.
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 785
Liked 6,633 Times in 2,093 Posts
Default

In my opinion, if you want 9mm+P performance, why not get a handgun which will shoot the 9x23mm ammo? My carry gun is in .38 Super and I call it my 9mm Magnum.
__________________
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-29-2022, 03:33 AM
TexasRaider's Avatar
TexasRaider TexasRaider is offline
Member
S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659 S&amp;W 659  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 362
Likes: 201
Liked 418 Times in 155 Posts
Default

Or, if you want near +P+ performance just get a .357 Sig. I'd also look for a .357 Sig pistol that came from pistols purpose built for the .40 S&W, like the Sig P229 or H&K USP.

Personally, and it's just my $00.02, I'd stay away from pistols that were hastily thrown together for .40 when it came out in 1990, just to get in on the rush of sales *cough cough S&W 4006 Glock 22 & Glock 23 cough cough* but were actually just 9mm pistols 'scaled up' with heavier slides and stronger recoil springs. Just my humble opinion....

Last edited by TexasRaider; 05-29-2022 at 03:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
659, model 59


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)