Horrible service from S&W- Advice needed

Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
2
Reaction score
15
TLDR: I have a brand new defective model 41 and after 4 trips back and forth for repair nothing has been done to address the fact the gun cannot be adjust to hit to POA. I need to know who to contact at S&W to get my brand new gun in usable shape.

The whole story follows...

Hi all. I am at wits end with S&W's service center and I really need some advice or, even better, the contact information for someone at S&W who actually understands my pistol's problem and has the ability to fix it. Here is my journey through the worst customer service I have ever experienced:

I purchased a brand new Model 41 on May 1st of 2024. The gun fired one round, and then the trigger would not reset. By removing the barreled assembly I found that the trigger was not able to reset because the trigger bar was binding on the barreled assembly. It would repeatedly reset perfectly without the barrel in place and catching the hammer with my thumb. I could have fixed it myself with some carefully polishing, but I didn't want to do anything to the pistol that would void the warranty. I also do not feel that a $1700 pistol should require me to gunsmith on it right out of the box.

So, on May 3rd I contacted S&W customer service. I explained that there was a parts interference that should be a simple fix. The girl on the phone told me that the gun needs a 500 round break in. I asked her how I was supposed to fire 500 rounds from a gun that won't fire at all, and she seemed confused by that statement. I told her it needed to be attended to and that I wanted their gunsmiths to look over the gun. She provided a return shipping label.

So, on May 6th I sent the gun in for repair. On May 30th the gun came back to me. A note said it was test fired and evaluated and passed all tests. The gun, however, had not been fixed in any way. The trigger would still not reset. Some grease had been applied to the area I identified as the spot of binding of parts. In frustration I carefully polished the spot of interference and cold blued it. Very little polishing was required and the gun's trigger reliably reset every time after that. However....

As I verified function at the range I also did what any owner of high grade target pistol with adjustable sights would do, which was attempt to sight the gun in. Using CCI Standard Velocity, which seems to universally be recommended for this pistol, the gun shoots 4" high at 25 yards with the rear sight all the way at the lowest setting. Knowing that I should be able to adjust it to shoot high or low at whim to adjust for different target presentations and distances (and for ammo besides just CCI Standard Velocity if I find a round that is more accurate) this was an obvious issue. I also tried Eley Club, Eley Match (black box), Lapua Pistol King, and Lapua OSP. They all hit higher than the CCI. The Eley Club hit 7" high at 25 yards, again this is all with the rear sight at the very lowest position. Groups were around an inch to inch and a half with all types of ammo and I fired both offhand and from a rest. I have been shooting competitively (and often winning or contesting for top spots) in multiple disciplines for almost 20 years. I am far beyond an average shooter. Not bragging by any means. I just want to establish that I am not letting the muzzle fly up so much that my trigger press or hold is causing a heavy rimfire pistol to shoot so incredibly high that the sights cannot adjust to compensate. I should note that the extension of the barreled assembly that holds the rear sight is not bent upwards as I have seen on some model 41s, although this pistol shoots so high that even that wouldn't explain the lack of ability to have the gun hit to point of aim.

So, I call S&W customer service again. I explain that it is a model 41, of course, and the tech tells me I need to install a taller front sight. I ask if he understands that the model 41's front sight is integral, milled from the same block of steel that makes up the barreled assembly, and is not, in any simple fashion, replaceable. He was definitely not accustomed with the model 41, but after I explained the integral nature of the front sight, he agreed that it needed to come back for service and may require replacement of the barreled assembly. So, on June 6th I sent the gun back for a second time.

On September 11th the gun gets back to me. I can see that the barreled assembly is the same, the rear sight is still bottomed out, and before I sent the gun back I turned the rear sight 12 clicks to the left of center impact. It appears to still be far left where I left it when shipped. I see a note in the return that states the pistol was sighted in and passed evaluation. So I go to the range and the gun is off the target to the left at 25 yards. So I turn the sight to the right 12 clicks and the windage is now dead on, but the gun still shoots CCI Standard Velocity 4" high at 25 yards.

So, I contact S&W customer service for the third time. I get an email back that they understand my frustration and that I will get a new case number and a manager has been notified of my continued failing of repair despite the previous return and they will ensure a proper repair. They issue a 3rd return shipping label, so on September 25th I return it for a third time, thinking it will surely be handled appropriately now.

On October 17th my pistol makes it back to me. I open the box to find a note saying that the gun had been back 3 times for a failed trigger reset and they replaced the trigger bar. The sight was set just the way I set it prior to shipping the gun back that 3rd time. Each time I sent the gun back I included a typed letter that clearly and concisely described why I was sending the gun for service. This time, and the previous time, my letter in the case with the pistol stated the pistol shoots 4" high with CCI Standard Velocity at 25 yards despite the rear sight at the lowest position. Obviously no one read it at all this time, for sure.

So, I call S&W customer service and ask to speak to someone that is a shooter and a has performed gun repairs before, and the rep on the phone says he can help. I explain my 3 returns and how literally no repairs had been made that addressed the failings of the pistol. He pulls up my previous return information and says he can see why I am so frustrated, and assures me that he understands the nature of my problem and that he will personally oversee the handling of the repairs. He tells me that he is putting in the "service required" notes that it needs "slide adjustment". I have no idea how you "adjust" a solid piece of metal, and the slide doesn't carry the rear sight, but he assures me that this means it will be properly repaired.

So, on October 29th I send the defective pistol back to S&W for the fourth time. I'm thinking that surely they can't fail as spectacularly this fourth time as they have previously, and this will get it taken care of. Again I include a note with the problem being that the gun shoots 4" high with CCI Standard Velocity ammo at 25 yards despite the sight bottomed out.

On November 20th the gun is delivered to my house for the 4th time. I open the box to see that nothing has been done to the barreled assembly, but it appears that the rear sight is now slightly leaning rearward like someone hit the rear of it with a rubber mallet until the rear of the sight assembly was contacting the extension of the barreled assembly. It was definitely not this way when I shipped the pistol back any of the 4 times. It is obviously the same barreled assembly that has not been able to be sighted in, but I was willing to give S&W the benefit of a doubt (stupid of me at this point). I hoped maybe they redrilled the barrel channel true this time and installed a barrel insert (even though I have pistols fitted with inserts/sleeves and you can obviously see the insert), or maybe carefully tig welded material to the front sight and machined it to look like factory new and reblued it to perfectly match. I was doubtful though, as the paper in the box stated they adjusted the sights and it passed evaluation.

So I was able to get to the range today. The gun shoots 4" high at 25 yards with CCI Standard Velocity and much higher with any other ammunition. I had a fellow club member who competes in Bullseye and Hi-power also shoot the pistol. He owns several model 41 pistols. The gun shot 4" high for him at 25 yards, again, with the sight all the way at it's lowest position with the rear of the sight blade now contacting the top of the barrel extension that retains the rear sight. He agreed it obviously needs a new barreled assembly since even a lower rear sight blade would not do enough to get it to hit to point of aim at any competitive pistol distance, and looking online at various vintages of rear sights for the model 41 we could not find a rear sight that was lower than the one on this brand new pistol.

So, I have a $1700 pistol that is completely unusable, and I have wasted hours of my time, gas, and ammunition to keep getting zero service from S&W. I own 13 other S&W firearms dating from 1983 onward and have had no problems with any of them. My only previous experience with S&W customer service was about 7 years ago when I needed a taller front sight for my 629 DX Classic. I called seeking advice after installing a taller target-oriented rear sight assembly (which I explained to the tech was obviously something I expected) and he knew the part number for the correct height front sight to get me on target off the top of his head. I ordered the sight and it was a perfect solution. Something has obviously changed for the worse at S&W.

I really need advice from someone who understands the broken inner workings of S&W's customer service department. I am utterly flabbergasted at how awful the knowledge and performance of this company's people has become. Surely there is someone at S&W that actually understands the problem with this pistol and also understands that it clearly needs a new barreled assembly. Anyone with even the most basic knowledge of pistol shooting can pick up this gun, fire a group, see that it impacts way too high compared to point of aim, then find that there is no more room in the adjustment range to bring the point of impact down to meet point of aim (unless you ONLY intend to shoot a pistol beyond 100 yards), and see that the front sight cannot be repaced and acknowledge that the pistol is defective.

So who can I contact at S&W that will resolve this for me? I've wanted a Model 41 since the 80's when, as a child, a friend's father let me shoot his. I was very excited when I bought this pistol. Now I fully regret the purchase of this pistol and honestly just want to get it fixed so I can sell it and never buy another S&W product again. I would sell it as is, but unlike S&W, I will not sell someone a defective gun.

Please help steer me to the right person to resolve this incredibly frustrating failure of customer service. I have run out of patience and ideas, and don't like the idea of being stuck with a $1700 paperweight.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Welcome to the New Smith & Wesson. I'm making popcorn for the apologists on here that will respond with:

1. Try different ammunition
2. Did you shoot it from a Ransom Rest?
3. Stop whining

I returned a brand-new Model 36-10 Classic to the factory a total of FOUR times last year - completely unfired - before S&W completely replaced the firearm. The result of each "repair" was a revolver in worse condition than when I returned it.

I also got the "manager personal attention" upgrade after my 2nd return... this must be one of their CS playbook phone tricks to placate the customer.

S&W QA is a horror show. I'm convinced they just assemble guns and box them up with absolutely no inspection. Maybe they fire a proof load them too - although based on online reports it appears that step gets skipped sometimes as well. I just today looked at two brand new Model 340. One of these $979 guns had a trigger pull so inconsistent that one chamber required two fingers to get the hammer to fall.

My condolences. My advice is to either continually return it until they give up and send you a new gun, or sell it and find something else.
 
Last edited:
Do you have a lemon law in your state? I’m in TN and we have a lemon law that I used to get a car replaced in the mid 80’s. My new car was in the shop 45 days in the first 6 months with 5 sets of fuel injectors being replaced, electrical harness, transmission and more. The replacement had a catastrophic electrical failure on the way home from picking it up and was back at the dealer on a tow truck a half hour later. After that was fixed I took it and traded it for a new Porsche.

Check your states consumer protection department.
 
First I want to express my sorrow hearing of your horrible S&W experience - the Company is NOT the same S&W it once was and your story is all too common these days!

Secondly and after reading your entire post I doubt that the people you are talking to up at the plant know how to shoot very well or are even experienced target shooters. When they test fire your M41 as long as it hits the paper in a somewhat consistent grouping I guess they can't understand what real accuracy is and what your concern really is. I doubt they understand what a $1,700 target pistol is truly supposed to be capable of. Last but not least, no one up at the repair dept. will be shooting your pistol at 25 yards. They are probably happy to hit the paper at 25 feet.

I would request to speak with the President of the Company (or at least someone with authority) and explain your concerns. If they still give you the run around I would request your money back - in full. Because of the extremely poor reputation over the last 2 decades that S&W quality, repair dept. and customer service has, I can no longer buy a S&W made after the early to mid 1990's. That is a sad and bold statement coming from a true S&W aficionado but honest and true. All my S&W's are from earlier runs now considered to be vintage.

If they will agree to refund your money you could of course buy a vintage M41 or even a Ruger Mark 4 Target pistol and then install a Volquartsen trigger kit in it. Out of the box Ruger triggers are horrible! With the Volquartsen trigger kit it should shoot just as well as a M41 - surprisingly enough considering that even including the trigger kit it is 1/3 the price!
While the Ruger is in no way as "prestigious", good looking or built as well as the old M41's, it will usually give you results far beyond its price and looks.

Of course if you do buy a vintage M41 there is no lifetime warranty so you are on your own if and when you do need service. That in itself does not bother me as I do not send anything back to them anyway. I fix them myself (much better and faster) and quite honestly they rarely need much more than a cleaning and lubrication if you buy one in proper condition to begin with.

I wish you luck with your M41 - I'm sure by now you are fit to be tied!! Let us know how you wind up and what you have decided to do going forward. BTW, the most common complaint with a M41 is that they are very ammo sensitive. As you have already stated, most seem to like and shoot the CCI standard velocity 40 grainers quite well.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the replies and advice. It's sad that the consensus is to basically not buy S&W products and buy something else, especially coming from a S&W forum. Since July 1st of 2021 S&W's stock has fallen from $31.89 per share to $13.25 as of November 21 of 2024. It seems I was late to the party hosted by people who understood this is a company on a downward spiral.

I own maybe 60 or so .22lr pistols. It's a bit sad that I have lost count. Most are target pistols, and some are action-shooting pistols that act as trainers to centerfire counterparts. They range from Volquartsen scorpion, Hammerli 208, several mkiii rugers, walther x-esse, taurus tx22s (every model in the lineup), conversion uppers for 1911s and CZs, and many, many others. I have a large collection of rimfire revolvers and centerfire handguns as well. I own dozens of shotguns and maybe 80 or so rifles. Only three guns out of more than 200 in total have ever needed factory support. One was a ruger MKIII with a canted front sight. Ruger replaced the gun quickly, and sent me a hat and three free magazines for my trouble. The second was a first gen Taurus TX22 that started to tumble shots at 10 yards. I contacted Taurus and just on my word they sent me a replacement barrel that arrived the next day (I'm 2 hours from their plant in south Georgia). This Model 41 is the third. It's good to know that other manufacturers still care about making a quality product.

I have much better shooting pistols than even the nicest 41s I've shot, but none of them were the pistol I longed for since childhood like the 41. This has basically killed a childhood dream of mine and I couldn't be more disappointed in what has become of a once great company. They might as well sell to China. The customer service would probably improve. It certainly can't get any worse.
 
I also own a nice collection of 22 pistols and revolvers. About 60% are S&W's and approx. 40% are Colt's - no Ruger's in my collection . My M41 has been my competition gun of choice in 22 rimfire and mine (bought new in 1979) has never had any issues - thankfully! While I do admire the original vintage High Standard's, I never bought one due to the mag. release being on the bottom and the slide catch & release being on the wrong side of the gun, for me. Accuracy, reliability, quality and triggers on the vintage HS's are excellent to say the least!
 
Sorry for your troubles. In your situation I would contact S & W again and politely but firmly ask to speak with a supervisor in the gunsmithing shop (now called the Performance Center) and escalate as far as you need to get the situation resolved, likely with a new gun or at least barrel assembly. Contacting the CEO by emailing your statement above at the same time probably wouldn't hurt either.
 
I can relate. It a shame the depths to which customer service has sunk in our country.

I bought a new Model 41 a year or so ago and found while shooting it that the slide would not return to battery after firing a shot - and I was using their preferred CCI Standard Velocity ammunition. I sent it back and received it a month later - which I feel was reasonable - with an invoice stating it was test-fired with no trouble found. Unfortunately, the condition remained.

I then took it to my gunsmith who admitted he had little experience with Model 41s but tried racking the slide a few times and said it felt excessively and unevenly tight to him. He removed the slide and laid a small straightedge along the rails and found high spots. He reinstalled the slide and worked it back and forth until it felt smoother. He then fired a magazine of lower velocity match ammo through it without a problem. I also shot it with full complete functioning.

How could a Smith & Wesson gunsmith not pick up on the slide roughness? And how could a Smith & Wesson gunsmith test-fire it without experiencing the condition? I guess those questions will go unanswered. Apparently, if I had shot it more than 50 rounds I would have corrected the condition myself but a customer should be able to be expect a new gun to function properly.

Welcome to life in these United States.

Ed
 
....They might as well sell to China. The customer service would probably improve. It certainly can't get any worse.

Maybe Taurus will buy them. Sounds like it would be an improvement.

I wonder if the move had anything to do with this? It sure sounds like they lost all their experienced people.
 
I hate to do this but.....
Quit whinning and just aim 4"low...
sorry had to do it,
I truly hope you can get this worked out and I can feel your frustration. One buys a gun to shoot it and have fun, not spend time and money to get it fixed or try to.
Wishing you the best of luck. I used to think the heads of S&W visited this site. If they do they really don't get how to run a company but the know how to ruin a company.
 
I had a similar issue with my Ruger MKII. Ruger sent me a new rear blade which I filed down. The window isn’t as big but it hits POA.
 
I'm sure when you used the word "gunsmith" in your letters to S&W CS, they wrinkled their foreheads, looked at each other and said "what's that?"

I'd write a letter to the CEO and copy this post in the letter, plus send any copies of your correspondence and the return paperwork. Ask for a complete new pistol, or a complete refund. I'd opt for the refund myself, then go on GB or anywhere else you could locate an older (mid '80s or previous) M41. You'd probably pay less and get a better-made pistol.
 
I have come to believe that sending e-mails to persons in authority are a complete and total waste of time. Your e-mail will never be seen by the CEO. If your e-mail isn't diverted directly into his spam folder, it will be read and trashed by his assistant.
I still believe in the power of the written/typed word and I seem to get my best results with actual written/typed letters sent via USPS Certified, Signature Required and Confirmation of service mail. As mentioned above full documentation of this ordeal as you have laid out here is your best course of action. Perhaps even a second packet, forwarded to the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Also an actual simple target with a clear point of aim marked and the resultant point of impact demonstrated.
Just a suggestion.
Good luck. It's truly sad what has become of once great institutions of manufacturing in this country.
 
I am very sorry and wish you luck. I recently purchased a Shield Plus. The first one right out of the box had a slide with serious scratches on it. I refused it and got another. It seems fine.

My advice is if you have a nice firearm that works, don't ever sell it. I am 71 and regret all of the many firearms trades I have made. Don't sell, rather accumulate.

BTW, when I was a younger man I bought a Model 41 to shoot the Nation Match Course. IIRC, this was in the late 70s. This gun also needed some work to function well but turned into a nice gun. I traded it for a High Standard Tournament that I liked better. I wish that I had kept both these pistols.
 
Last edited:
I have found over the years that having the Executive Assistant to the CEO read the letter results in action, not dumping something in the trash.

She (it's usually a woman) speaks for the CEO. If she picks up the phone or sends an email asking someone to do something, it gets done.



I have come to believe that sending e-mails to persons in authority are a complete and total waste of time. Your e-mail will never be seen by the CEO. If your e-mail isn't diverted directly into his spam folder, it will be read and trashed by his assistant.
I still believe in the power of the written/typed word and I seem to get my best results with actual written/typed letters sent via USPS Certified, Signature Required and Confirmation of service mail. As mentioned above full documentation of this ordeal as you have laid out here is your best course of action. Perhaps even a second packet, forwarded to the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Also an actual simple target with a clear point of aim marked and the resultant point of impact demonstrated.
Just a suggestion.
Good luck. It's truly sad what has become of once great institutions of manufacturing in this country.
 
I fully agree with the system of "making the CEO do some work." I have found that finding the CEO's Deputy (usually available in the Company Registry) then sending "Addressee only Return Receipt" usually pays off well above the costs involved (roughly$20 or so to the USPS). Not a pistol in my case, but some "bounced checks that were not mine to begin with." Ended up with a request to take my wife and I out to a fine dinner and send the bill to the CEO. Excellent meal with suitable "libations" and taxi fares, paid within 5 days of sending in the receipts. Dave_n
 
Back
Top