110 grain +P+

Register to hide this ad
38 Special +P+ is still not up to 357 Magnum pressures, so I'd say it would be fine in a 66 that's in good condition.
 
Be careful! He didn't say 38s, they could be 357s! It's not that the 66 can handle 357s, it's the fact that the light, short 110s will be slamming the forcing cone with very fast +P+ pressures and you may end up with a cracked forcing cone.:( Search the forum and see what it has even done to Model 19s with 110s in just +Ps.
 
Last edited:
I might be wrong, but most +P or +P+ ammo isnt magnum designated. Ive never seen a .357 +P or +P+ round. So I think it would be a 38.special round.
 
Be careful! He didn't say 38s, they could be 357s!

I've never seen or even heard of "357 Magnum +P+" so, of course, I'm assuming he meant 38 Special +P+.

I'd be willing to bet that even 110 gr 38 +P+ is still clocking less than 1200 fps, so it should not be an issue with the 66 forcing cone.
 
I'd be willing to bet that even 110 gr 38 +P+ is still clocking less than 1200 fps, so it should not be an issue with the 66 forcing cone.

Do a search and see what they have done to 19s, the same gun in carbon steel.

It's the shorter light 110s hitting the force cone at that speed that does the damage.
 
Do a search and see what they have done to 19s, the same gun in carbon steel.

It's the shorter light 110s hitting the force cone at that speed that does the damage.

The problem was 110-125 gr 357 Magnum loads pushing 1500+ fps, not 38 Special loads.
 
This load in 38, 110 +P+, used to be the BP duty ammo when I was in and I carried it and shot it in my Model 66-2 with no issues. I also have never heard of any .357 +P+ but will never claim that I know all there is to know about ammo.

If you have any doubts, give S&W a call...
 
+P+

Sorry, it is Winchester 38 special +p+ 110 grain hp"s. Le only marked boxes. Thanks
 
Sorry, it is Winchester 38 special +p+ 110 grain hp"s. Le only marked boxes. Thanks

Winchester's specs on that load are 1155 fps so it's well below the velocity (and pressure) of 110-125 gr bullets in 357, which cause problems in the Model 19 and 66.
 
If you're worried, trade or sell them off to somebody and buy something else. It's a lousy target round, and an even worse self defense load.
 
Search on"+P+" to learn everything you ever wanted to know about this ammo, including chronoed velocities from every barrel length around.

You will also need to turn on your BS filter!

Good shooting.
 
If you're worried, trade or sell them off to somebody and buy something else. It's a lousy target round, and an even worse self defense load.

Lighter bullets never has impress me. If your looking for a good self defense round for your M66 I suggest Buffalo Bores 158gr +P 38 special LSWCHP. Known as the "FBI" round. In a 4 inch revolver the velocity is over 1200 fps. Plus you get a good pentration round. In a short barrel you will still get around 1100 fps. This round is by far the stoutest 38 +P round going. Any more you might as well go to a 357 round.

By the way this round is what I use in my M13, M66 and M10.

Good luck,
roaddog28
 
thanks for the responses. I will probaly carry the +p+ 110's instead of a 125 357 mag load. I'm alittle worried about over penetration with the 357 mag load. Thanks, keep safe.
 
thanks for the responses. I will probaly carry the +p+ 110's instead of a 125 357 mag load. I'm alittle worried about over penetration with the 357 mag load. Thanks, keep safe.

Over penetration is largely an invented problem by those selling whiz bang ammo. However, under-penetration, something the 110 +P+ is infamous for, is a real problem.

There are loads that will perform much better in .38 special. I would carry 148 grain wadcutters before I would use the Treasury loads.
 
If I remember correctly the Super Vel round in 38 Special with the 110 JHP is the round which was the Model 19 forcing cone cracker. Of course they also had the same bullet in 357 Magnum but it was the 38 that everyone wanted to soup up and Super Vel was the first. My experience with cracked cones has all been anecdotal and seemed to happen less once stainless steel was introduced. Back in the 1970's it was "the round." Today there are a lot of better and heavier bullets. I think I'd rather have a good old 158 SWC loaded to about 950fps in 4" than the 110 JHP. Lots better than jagged rocks, though!
 
The 110 +P+ was actually designed for the 2 1/2 in M-66. The Feds used it. Also if memory serves, it was the 125 JHP .357 Mag. at 1450 FPS that did the damage to forcing cones. the 110 gr. >357 is not loaded nearly as hot.
 
Back
Top